0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ok so it warmed up after february, but the summer was poor, all following the patterns of sudden atmospheric volatility and instability brought about by contracting gasses. SNOWY WINTER TO FOLLOW
Quote from: puppypower on 02/09/2020 14:29:59One research team appeared to have induced fusion using chemical means. If only one research team had found a rise in global temperatures, or if the temperature had only been measured at one specific time. you would have a valid argument.But there's a large amount of data and it broadly agrees. (You wouldn't expect perfect agreement because there are other factors involved).Quote from: puppypower on 02/09/2020 14:29:59The Corona pandemic was just a test balloon in terms of social consequences of disrupting the supply chain. No, it was (and is) a viral pandemic.Quote from: puppypower on 02/09/2020 14:29:59These planning is not being done by scientists, but by liberal artists and lawyers to create a virtue single data point solution.It's hardly relevant to the topic, but illustrative of your grasp of facts that your statement there is more or less the opposite of what happened.The scientists (post 2009) came up with a pandemic preparedness plan.The artists like Boris decided to defund it because "pandemics don't happen".
One research team appeared to have induced fusion using chemical means.
The Corona pandemic was just a test balloon in terms of social consequences of disrupting the supply chain.
These planning is not being done by scientists, but by liberal artists and lawyers to create a virtue single data point solution.
https://www.weatherboy.com/from-paris-to-athens-from-hawaii-to-texas-heavy-snow-blankets-the-globe/
The record for the earth, in terms of global heating and climate change, goes back nearly 5 billion years to its creation
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 17/02/2021 20:12:18https://www.weatherboy.com/from-paris-to-athens-from-hawaii-to-texas-heavy-snow-blankets-the-globe/This large percent global snow cover was an interesting week long regional global cooling event, during this period of global warming and climate change. This event is still called climate change, whether it is up or down. This flexibility in nomenclature makes for easy semantic gaming.
Global weirding is back
Quote from: puppypower on 20/02/2021 13:03:40The record for the earth, in terms of global heating and climate change, goes back nearly 5 billion years to its creationNo.Unless someone, or something records it, there is no record.
Has anyone tried to normalize the data, by using weather data from only from monitoring locations from 1890, while using only mercury thermometers?
Fauci?
If these solutions do not work, but cause human suffering, will those in charge be tried for crimes against humanity?
. The recession of the glaciers made it all the way to the Arctic circle, before we seemed to notice the short ball opportunity. The denier beatdown scam was politically motivated, and not science based. It was designed to make one not look at the long ball data, through public shaming. If you did that, you would be called yucky. Nobody wants to be yucky, so we accommodate, based on long term patterns of conditioned behavior. The short ball approach begins the story of the glaciers retreating, the day before yesterday, which is ripe for manipulative fantasy. We are told to ignore the last ice age, and then the retreat of the glaciers, over several thousands miles of melting, and focus on just the last 100 years, which is not in any way, shape, or form connected to the last ice. This is unique and is all backed by a consensus of passengers riding a gravity train.
The doom and gloom predictions of the computer models do not pan out each year, over the past 20 years,
You hear that? Puppypower knows more about climate science than the actual climate scientists do. Either that, or actual climate scientists are in on a conspiracy.
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/05/2021 04:19:59You hear that? Puppypower knows more about climate science than the actual climate scientists do. Either that, or actual climate scientists are in on a conspiracy.Either that or they are in denial once again, as was seen in the cfc and ozone hole argument.
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 08/05/2021 09:13:44Quote from: Kryptid on 08/05/2021 04:19:59You hear that? Puppypower knows more about climate science than the actual climate scientists do. Either that, or actual climate scientists are in on a conspiracy.Either that or they are in denial once again, as was seen in the cfc and ozone hole argument. So who do you think discovered that a hole was present in the ozone layer with the causative agent being CFCs? An artists collective?