0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My experiment to detect for the aether would involve taking a picture of a split light beam, then measuring from the dead center of the split, use a computer ruler and focusing to find out if the light is faster in one direction over the other. One would expect it to be shorter on one end as long as it isn't measured while moving perfectly perpendicular to the earth's movement through the galaxy, and the galaxy's movement around other galaxy's.
The science world is so backwards. On the one hand it pushes relativity and the idea that space is not a medium for light. Then they set out to prove gravity waves which are waves in the medium of space by itself. pretty silly
My experiment to detect for the aether would involve taking a picture of a split light beam,
I get irritated when they call this trillion frame per second photography.The bus goes past my house at exactly 8 a.m. every day.If I take a picture at 08:00:00 today an at 08:00:01 tomorrow and 08:00:02 the next day and so on, then edit all the pictures into a video, have I take a 1 frame per second video?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/09/2017 21:14:19I get irritated when they call this trillion frame per second photography.The bus goes past my house at exactly 8 a.m. every day.If I take a picture at 08:00:00 today an at 08:00:01 tomorrow and 08:00:02 the next day and so on, then edit all the pictures into a video, have I taken a 1 frame per second video?Your discussion here is as number salad as on the other thread as well.
I get irritated when they call this trillion frame per second photography.The bus goes past my house at exactly 8 a.m. every day.If I take a picture at 08:00:00 today an at 08:00:01 tomorrow and 08:00:02 the next day and so on, then edit all the pictures into a video, have I taken a 1 frame per second video?
And at 5 seconds I measured the light on the screen and it is in fact faster in one direction then the other! I measured 16.4 cm on the top half and 16.7 cm on the bottom!!!!!!!!!! HOLY
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 18/05/2019 01:02:08And at 5 seconds I measured the light on the screen and it is in fact faster in one direction then the other! I measured 16.4 cm on the top half and 16.7 cm on the bottom!!!!!!!!!! HOLYThat animation is computer-generated. It isn't a video taken with an actual camera (hence why the video is titled "Virtual" Femto Photography): https://benedikt-bitterli.me/femto.htmlHow is your proposed experiment any better than the other ones that already looked for an aether?
It's an animation.It is not real.Do you not understand that?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/05/2019 16:18:53It's an animation.It is not real.Do you not understand that?Thank for your expertise in the matter genius but I'll take the word of the description in the link thank you
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 18/05/2019 16:22:50Quote from: Bored chemist on 18/05/2019 16:18:53It's an animation.It is not real.Do you not understand that?Thank for your expertise in the matter genius but I'll take the word of the description in the link thank you There is no part of that description which says other than that the video is an animation.It's not a matter of " I'll take the word of the description" it's a matter of understanding it.Would you like to quote the bit you think says you are right?
Do you even understand how computer animation works?
Would you like to quote the bit you think says you are right?
I have made computer animations of things that didn't exist and which I never drew.
So you just what, said to your computer, "uhh, draw what a laser beam going through milk looks like, and your infinite computer just happens to know what that looks like
So, rather than misrepresenting what I said: