0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Alright forget that for a second and step outside your relativity box
step outside your relativity box
mainstream science seems geared toward accepting results from the very first tests that are seriously outdated
and making a runaway with GR fantasy.
.... Maybe we should study art a litlle more ...
basic F*ing photshop 101. ... I guess studying something tangible would be mind boggling.
It's not a cartoon fools! basic F*ing photshop 101.
End of discussion for me.
"we created a virtual camera that was fast enough""we could capture light as it spreads through the virtual scene"" 2D light transport simulator ""Monte Carlo raytracing""we assign our virtual camera""To keep track of time along light paths, I will be using a slightly modified geometric optics model""on top of our existing 2D renderer with only a few lines of code.""we use a conventional 2D renderer""We annotate each vertex on these light paths with a timestamp""store these in memory""we iterate over all segments""splat the line segment to the screen""we could do it in a vertex shader"
In fact I've yet to find someone who doesn't argue.
This experiment is the cornerstone of my proof for gravity fields and EMR being density on the space medium.
this one does seem to be backed up by experiment.
Anyone have the guts to agree with me?