[paulggriffiths (OP)]

Gay is illegal in Britain.

No- not for about 50 years I think.
Not that it's relevant.
You may also wish to learn the difference between bizarre and bazaar.

50 years? Think not. Chemist thinks b...... is legal.
You made it relevant with the sound of you're text.
Bizarre is an understatement.

I'm not the only one who thinks so.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/homosexuality-legal-50-years-gay-queer-trans-people-lgbt-rights-sex-peter-tatchell-1967-a7860831.html

Ok, I guess lifestyle is improving.
Just be careful of some hanging around trying to "Bend you".

Guess I have to give you an apology as I would not like to encourage the idea of it.
Sorry.

[Bored chemist]

Gay is illegal in Britain.

No- not for about 50 years I think.
Not that it's relevant.
You may also wish to learn the difference between bizarre and bazaar.

50 years? Think not. Chemist thinks b...... is legal.
You made it relevant with the sound of you're text.
Bizarre is an understatement.

I'm not the only one who thinks so.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/homosexuality-legal-50-years-gay-queer-trans-people-lgbt-rights-sex-peter-tatchell-1967-a7860831.html

Ok, I guess lifestyle is improving.
Just be careful of some hanging around trying to "Bend you".

Guess I have to give you an apology as I would not like to encourage the idea of it.
Sorry.

Now, not that it matters, why do you think your mistaken opinion of my preferences matters to anything?

All it seems to have done is show up that you don't know what you are talking about.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

Gay is illegal in Britain.

No- not for about 50 years I think.
Not that it's relevant.
You may also wish to learn the difference between bizarre and bazaar.

50 years? Think not. Chemist thinks b...... is legal.
You made it relevant with the sound of you're text.
Bizarre is an understatement.

I'm not the only one who thinks so.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/homosexuality-legal-50-years-gay-queer-trans-people-lgbt-rights-sex-peter-tatchell-1967-a7860831.html

Ok, I guess lifestyle is improving.
Just be careful of some hanging around trying to "Bend you".

Guess I have to give you an apology as I would not like to encourage the idea of it.
Sorry.

Now, not that it matters, why do you think your mistaken opinion of my preferences matters to anything?

All it seems to have done is show up that you don't know what you are talking about.

What makes you think your opinion about my inventions matter to me other than what follows?
Am I on your thread?
Are you a qualified chemist?
Are you formally accusing me of fraud or going beyond and the word slander?

[Bored chemist]

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

[alancalverd]

I live in Bristol.

If that isn't an insult to Bristolians, it explains nothing.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

Do you wish to repeat that?

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

I live in Bristol.

If that isn't an insult to Bristolians, it explains nothing.

It explains that I live in Bristol.
A Prince of The Royal Tribe Of Wales & Scotland, England, Ireland & more.
Best you stick to attending your cattle.   
Edit: Cattle was Calvert, also A Lord, imagined colonizing America.. You're Calverd, A family name, A fish.
Do you want to continue this?

[Bored chemist]

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

So sad...

[Kryptid]

Well, the text you wrote makes me believe you are gay.

What does homosexuality have to do with it? Do you think being gay makes a person stupid or not credible or what?

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

Well, the text you wrote makes me believe you are gay.

What does homosexuality have to do with it? Do you think being gay makes a person stupid or not credible or what?

Stupid? Does not stand up in court.
Not creditable? Would help.
Or what? Probably picked on.

What do you think?
I would say you would have to be picked on before picking on someone else or is a problem within someone to pick on somebody.
There is defiantly a reason to pick on somebody and it is defiantly the attackers fault.

[Kryptid]

What do you think?

I think you were trying to use it as an insult to him.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

What do you think?

I think you were trying to use it as an insult to him.

Yes, he was repeatedly attacking my credibility as an inventor, so I have a little fun.
So, small features my friend.

[Bored chemist]

Well, the text you wrote makes me believe you are gay.

What does homosexuality have to do with it? Do you think being gay makes a person stupid or not credible or what?

Stupid? Does not stand up in court.
Not creditable? Would help.
Or what? Probably picked on.

What do you think?

I think you were hoping I'd say something dim like "how dare you accuse me of being gay!" then you could accuse me of homophobia and so on.
That would be consistent with the fact that you have repeatedly failed to explain why you even mentioned it.

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

[Bored chemist]

What do you think?

I think you were trying to use it as an insult to him.

Yes, he was repeatedly attacking my credibility as an inventor, so I have a little fun.
So, small features my friend.

Since you have failed to explain how most of your "inventions" could work, and some of them plainly couldn't, nor have you shown any patents or other suggestions that anyone but you thought they might work, and in at least one case, someone else already patented "your" invention,  I don't think I could attack your credibility as an inventor.

As far as I can see, you have very little credibility to attack.
Feel free to show me that I'm wrong and that others think you are credible.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

Well, the text you wrote makes me believe you are gay.

What does homosexuality have to do with it? Do you think being gay makes a person stupid or not credible or what?

Stupid? Does not stand up in court.
Not creditable? Would help.
Or what? Probably picked on.

What do you think?

I think you were hoping I'd say something dim like "how dare you accuse me of being gay!" then you could accuse me of homophobia and so on.
That would be consistent with the fact that you have repeatedly failed to explain why you even mentioned it.

As I said, it looks like you have no idea what you are talking about.

Now, imagining what someone else is thinking is a bit like a strong person knowing others are weaker though obviously if the someone is strong, some others are too.
Some people "think" they are strong, but never have competed,

[Kryptid]

Yes, he was repeatedly attacking my credibility as an inventor, so I have a little fun.
So, small features my friend.

I can't seem to find the rules on this board, but I'm pretty sure insulting the other members is in violation of them. To be honest, most of the inventions you have told us about have been limited to a list of invention names. We don't know how they work or if they even would work. To question whether an undescribed invention could actually function seems like a legitimate criticism to me. I've actually come up with a lot of inventions as well, but I never actually built any of them and as I grew more knowledgeable about science and technology, I discovered that many of them would not have worked (or at least would not have been practically useful). That doesn't mean that your inventions necessarily won't work, but it does raise the question of how we are supposed to know if they will.

[paulggriffiths (OP)]

Yes, he was repeatedly attacking my credibility as an inventor, so I have a little fun.
So, small features my friend.

I can't seem to find the rules on this board, but I'm pretty sure insulting the other members is in violation of them. To be honest, most of the inventions you have told us about have been limited to a list of invention names. We don't know how they work or if they even would work. To question whether an undescribed invention could actually function seems like a legitimate criticism to me. I've actually come up with a lot of inventions as well, but I never actually built any of them and as I grew more knowledgeable about science and technology, I discovered that many of them would not have worked (or at least would not have been practically useful). That doesn't mean that your inventions necessarily won't work, but it does raise the question of how we are supposed to know if they will.

Well, this started with the Sun. The Bored Chemist repeatedly attacked my credibility so I gave a list of my inventions.
They ALL are creatable like for instance my OutwardPistonsChamberEngine:
Pistons in an outward direction with a central chamber for combined "explosion". Each piston is connected to a rod, a cog.
Each cog equally rotates a cog going around the outside.
4 of such is required for a 4 combustion engine.
Which could be conveniently used inside a wheel.

Any others?

[guest39538]

Your not the guy who invented the Cucumber end cap are you?

[Kryptid]

Well, this started with the Sun. The Bored Chemist repeatedly attacked my credibility so I gave a list of my inventions.
They ALL are creatable like for instance my OutwardPistonsChamberEngine:
Pistons in an outward direction with a central chamber for combined "explosion". Each piston is connected to a rod, a cog.
Each cog equally rotates a cog going around the outside.
4 of such is required for a 4 combustion engine.
Which could be conveniently used inside a wheel.

Any others?

That sounds like it could work but wouldn't be much different from the radial engines used on some aircraft.

I'm sure all of your inventions could actually be built, but that doesn't mean they would all work (or work in a more efficient manner than existing machines). Especially those with claimed extraordinary performance, like the one you say can push a ship to the speed of light.