[guest39538]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Nonsense.

Really ? You are saying atoms do not have two opposite polarities as properties? 

[The Spoon]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

[guest39538]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Every atom is composed of a nucleus and one or more electrons bound to the nucleus. The nucleus is made of one or more protons and typically a similar number of neutrons. Protons and neutrons are called nucleons. More than 99.94% of an atom's mass is in the nucleus. The protons have a positive electric charge, the electrons have a negative electric charge, and the neutrons have no electric charge. If the number of protons and electrons are equal, that atom is electrically neutral. If an atom has more or fewer electrons than protons, then it has an overall negative or positive charge, respectively, and it is called an ion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom

[Bored chemist]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told that you are wrong.

[guest39538]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told that you are wrong.

Told they are wrong does not equate to proven wrong.

[guest39538]

Thank you , you helped me with my question and answer. 


I have to explain why some sub atomic particles with no net charge are still attracted, the answer is simple, they are attracted to the atomic particles charge the same as charge is attracted to none charged things but in reverse,


In simple terms, every sub atomic particle you can think up is attracted to the atoms properties of two opposite polarities.

 

[guest39538]

abn.jpg (29.64 kB . 740x464 - viewed 1961 times)

0 net Q ≠  0 net F

[Bored chemist]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told that you are wrong.

Told they are wrong does not equate to proven wrong.

Thanks for the correction

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told it is proven that you are wrong.

[guest39538]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told that you are wrong.

Told they are wrong does not equate to proven wrong.

Thanks for the correction

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Simple- never learn when you get told it is proven that you are wrong.

Apart from you saying nonsense or it is wrong, you have not proved me wrong about time and you have not proved me wrong about my gravity idea.  They are two objectively  strong ideas.

[jeffreyH]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Every atom is composed of a nucleus and one or more electrons bound to the nucleus. The nucleus is made of one or more protons and typically a similar number of neutrons. Protons and neutrons are called nucleons. More than 99.94% of an atom's mass is in the nucleus. The protons have a positive electric charge, the electrons have a negative electric charge, and the neutrons have no electric charge. If the number of protons and electrons are equal, that atom is electrically neutral. If an atom has more or fewer electrons than protons, then it has an overall negative or positive charge, respectively, and it is called an ion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom

Careful ... you are in danger of making sense. That will never prolong the argument and I know you love a good argument.

[guest39538]

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists. 

I don't think anything,

The physics suggests neutral things are attracted to neutral things.

Because  opposite polarities are properties of Neutral things.

Wow. How can one person be wrong about so many things....

Every atom is composed of a nucleus and one or more electrons bound to the nucleus. The nucleus is made of one or more protons and typically a similar number of neutrons. Protons and neutrons are called nucleons. More than 99.94% of an atom's mass is in the nucleus. The protons have a positive electric charge, the electrons have a negative electric charge, and the neutrons have no electric charge. If the number of protons and electrons are equal, that atom is electrically neutral. If an atom has more or fewer electrons than protons, then it has an overall negative or positive charge, respectively, and it is called an ion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom

Careful ... you are in danger of making sense. That will never prolong the argument and I know you love a good argument.

Iol , I do love a good argument, but most of all I love it if somebody can prove me wrong in a notion,  then I can give up on that notion.   I have to break through somewhere to exist on Wiki, then I will be happy.

[Bored chemist]

Apart from you saying nonsense or it is wrong, you have not proved me wrong ...

I have repeatedly shown that you are wrong.
So have others.

The atom is the neutron.

No.
The neutron has a half life of 881.5 seconds.
The hydrogen atom does not.
...

On the basis that opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists.

OK, so your basis is false.
We know that uncharged things attract one another - Cavendish did the first "laboratory" experiment on this ages ago.
You seem to be claiming it's true because you think it's true.
That's not science.

(-e) + (+1e) = n

OK, that's clear- but it's wrong.
In the real world
(-e) + (+1e) = a pair of gamma rays

ol , I do love a good argument, but most of all I love it if somebody can prove me wrong in a notion,  then I can give up on that notion. 

But that is clearly  what you refuse to do.
You don't give up, you keep on trolling.

[guest39538]

I have repeatedly shown that you are wrong.
So have others

Really, when was this then in your imagination? 

You have proved nothing and all's you ever do is say I proved you wrong or nonsense when you have done nothing of the such. 


Your idea of proving somebody wrong is quoting a wiki page,  other than that you have no science skill set.


You act a bit like Police and force your ''statutes'' of Wiki on people,  people are waking up and you  just don't like it.

[Bored chemist]

Really, when was this then in your imagination? 

No, it was in this post.

Apart from you saying nonsense or it is wrong, you have not proved me wrong ...

I have repeatedly shown that you are wrong.
So have others.

The atom is the neutron.

No.
The neutron has a half life of 881.5 seconds.
The hydrogen atom does not.
...

On the basis that opposite polarities are seemingly the only attractive force of the Universe that exists.

OK, so your basis is false.
We know that uncharged things attract one another - Cavendish did the first "laboratory" experiment on this ages ago.
You seem to be claiming it's true because you think it's true.
That's not science.

(-e) + (+1e) = n

OK, that's clear- but it's wrong.
In the real world
(-e) + (+1e) = a pair of gamma rays

ol , I do love a good argument, but most of all I love it if somebody can prove me wrong in a notion,  then I can give up on that notion. 

But that is clearly  what you refuse to do.
You don't give up, you keep on trolling.

[guest39538]

We know that uncharged things attract one another - Cavendish did the first "laboratory" experiment on this ages ago.
You seem to be claiming it's true because you think it's true.
That's not science.

Bangs head against walls, I know of the Cavendish experiment,  I know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged, I have been telling you this for like ever now,


or were you secretly helping me ?


Prove gravity is not

1) Charged things are attracted to uncharged things (neutral).

2) Uncharged things (Neutral) is attracted to uncharged things (neutral),

[guest39538]

Logical argument

If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,B

[Bored chemist]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

[Bored chemist]

Logical argument

If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,B

Nope, word salad.

[guest39538]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

They are attracted to each other because of something?   

Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 
From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance.  So come back when you have learnt some science,

[guest39538]

Logical argument

If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,B

Nope, word salad.

Quite obvious you have never done an I.Q test,  if you think the above is nonsense then you simply do not have the I.Q to read it.