[The Spoon]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

They are attracted to each other because of something?   

Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 
From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance.  So come back when you have learnt some science,

You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:

http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)

I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?

[guest39538]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

They are attracted to each other because of something?   

Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 
From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance.  So come back when you have learnt some science,

You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:

http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)

I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?

Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science.
You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.   

[Bored chemist]

Logical argument

If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,B

Nope, word salad.

Quite obvious you have never done an I.Q test,  ...

It may be "obvious", but it's not true.
Which makes it clear that you can't recognise the truth when you see it.
That explains a lot.

[Bored chemist]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

[guest39538]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

Lmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth.   The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material.
Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon

[The Spoon]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

Lmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth.   The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material.
Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon

So, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey.

[guest39538]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

Lmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth.   The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material.
Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon

So, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey.

NO, I know what the difference is according to ''you'' , but guess what?  you are still wrong and making things up .

[The Spoon]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

Lmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth.   The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material.
Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon

So, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey.

NO, I know what the difference is according to ''you'' , but guess what?  you are still wrong and making things up .

Oh do grow up. The internationally accepted definition doesnt fit you ridiculous world view so you claim it is wrong? Who are you? Humpty dumpty?

[guest39538]

kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 

Actually, he's right.
Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.
They really are different.
I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons  I weigh on Earth

Lmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth.   The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material.
Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon

So, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey.

NO, I know what the difference is according to ''you'' , but guess what?  you are still wrong and making things up .

Oh do grow up. The internationally accepted definition doesnt fit you ridiculous world view so you claim it is wrong? Who are you? Humpty dumpty?

The internationally accepted definition doesn't fit reality, try again Mr Spoon .   With all due respect, they are wrong and trying to glorify science in being something it is not.

[guest39538]

kg = Newtons

(F=ma)  =    (m=Fa ) 


mass in kg is a result on a set of scales, the result is created by the force being imposed on the object.

[The Spoon]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

They are attracted to each other because of something?   

Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 
From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance.  So come back when you have learnt some science,

You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:

http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)

I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?

Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science.
You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.   

Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science.
You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.   

My arugument is frivilous litigation? What is that? A  term you have picked up on a legal forum that you think sounds impressive so you thought you would missapply it? Do you think it makes you sound like a gentleman scientist? It doesn't it just displays your very evident ignorance.

The link I gave you wasn't Wiki either, it is from the National Physical Laboratory. Ironic as the only source of information you ever quote is is wikipedia. Good job that definition is right too as it my make my job difficult if not... Still, I suppose that wouldnt affect you would it? I still think you are despicable for mocking people with brain tumours by the way.

[guest39538]

know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,

Non sequitur.
They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.

They are attracted to each other because of something?   

Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons.  If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. 
From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance.  So come back when you have learnt some science,

You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:

http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)

I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?

Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science.
You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.   

Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science.
You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.   

My arugument is frivilous litigation? What is that? A  term you have picked up on a legal forum that you think sounds impressive so you thought you would missapply it? Do you think it makes you sound like a gentleman scientist? It doesn't it just displays your very evident ignorance.

The link I gave you wasn't Wiki either, it is from the National Physical Laboratory. Ironic as the only source of information you ever quote is is wikipedia. Good job that definition is right too as it my make my job difficult if not... Still, I suppose that wouldnt affect you would it? I still think you are despicable for mocking people with brain tumours by the way.

A brain Tuna is not a  brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words.
Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. 

Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales,  What makes this result?    quite clearly the force between two objects.  No force no mass simple.

[guest39538]

mm.jpg (19.37 kB . 740x464 - viewed 1486 times)

[Bored chemist]

No force no mass simple.

Simple; but wrong.
There's an entire wiki page dedicated to explaining it to people who don't understand the difference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_versus_weight

Try learning- it can make you feel good.

[guest39538]

No force no mass simple.

Simple; but wrong.
There's an entire wiki page dedicated to explaining it to people who don't understand the difference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_versus_weight

Try learning- it can make you feel good.

I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation, it does not matter how many times you repeat and try to insult my intelligence, the fact you are wrong will not change.
Now if you want to agree it is the same but used for different things, then I am happy to accept that.

[The Spoon]

A brain Tuna is not a  brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words.
Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. 

Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales,  What makes this result?    quite clearly the force between two objects.  No force no mass simple.

Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled.
In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law.
Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky.

[Bored chemist]

No force no mass simple.

Simple; but wrong.
There's an entire wiki page dedicated to explaining it to people who don't understand the difference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_versus_weight

Try learning- it can make you feel good.

I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation, it does not matter how many times you repeat and try to insult my intelligence, the fact you are wrong will not change.
Now if you want to agree it is the same but used for different things, then I am happy to accept that.

As far as I'm aware, nobody here is involved in litigation.
I'm certainly not.

You should learn what the word means.

Oh, I forgot you said "I do not need to learn anything,"
Well, technically, it's true.
You can go on looking like a twit.
Enjoy.

BTW, among the reasons you are wrong is that this

Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales,

is plainly wrong in zero gravity.

[The Spoon]

'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'

You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase.

[guest39538]

A brain Tuna is not a  brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words.
Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. 

Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales,  What makes this result?    quite clearly the force between two objects.  No force no mass simple.

Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled.
In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law.
Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky.

There is a likely situation where I might have autism and be a higher functioning autistic person.  I have brain dis-functions so If I want to take the mick out of myself I will.

Mass is shown on a set of scales, and you do not speak for the world, if people were aware of me and my notions in full, science would become a laughing stock. 
Mass is shown on a set of scales like you agree, so what gives the object its mass? 

I think objectively you will find the answer is force my friend.

[guest39538]

'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'

You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase.

Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education.   You can not have a discussion about an idea, you do not know how to discuss an idea.   Saying a person is wrong just on the basis of posting present information , the information that I am showing is wrong, is not discussing my friend and not looking why it is wrong.