[Yaniv (OP)]

Are you talking about the flat baselines on thermogravimetric graphs ?
Yes.
They are not great, but they are the only data you have, and they don't support your assertion.

They are not great and not conclusive. #ResultsRequired

[Bored chemist]

Do you think that putting a hash in " #ResultsRequired" somehow stops it being YOUR job to get those results?

There is, indeed, a requirement for results.
That's because you have not provided any.
So, as I said, come back when you have better data.

[Yaniv (OP)]

There is, indeed, a requirement for results.
That's because you have not provided any.
So, as I said, come back when you have better data.

The University of Leeds advised me to drop theory without the results of the experiment and elsewhere I couldn't find scientists interested to do the experiment and publish the results. Do you think I would have been here had I found physicists to conclude the experiment ?

[Bored chemist]

Do you think I would have been here had I found physicists to conclude the experiment ?

No.
I think the University of Leeds is right to essentially dismiss your idea.

[Yaniv (OP)]

I think the University of Leeds is right to essentially dismiss your idea.

And I think the University of Leeds and other scientists should complete the experiment to conclusion.

[Bored chemist]

I think the University of Leeds is right to essentially dismiss your idea.

And I think the University of Leeds and other scientists should complete the experiment to conclusion.

You may think that.
They think that there are better things to do with their limited funds.
Only one viewpoint can be right.
Do you think it is more likely to be the viewpoint of a university full of clever people, or a person posting nonsense on the web?

[Yaniv (OP)]

And I think the University of Leeds and other scientists should complete the experiment to conclusion.
You may think that.
They think that there are better things to do with their limited funds.
Only one viewpoint can be right.
Do you think it is more likely to be the viewpoint of a university full of clever people, or a person posting nonsense on the web?

And I think physicists repress the results of the experiment to protect funds, jobs, careers and reputations of many scientists. #ResultsRequired

[Kryptid]

And I think physicists repress the results of the experiment to protect funds, jobs, careers and reputations of many scientists. #ResultsRequired

Oh boy, another conspiracy theorist...

[Yaniv (OP)]

Oh boy, another conspiracy theorist...

Conspiracy fiction or conspiracy fact ? #ResultsRequired

[Bored chemist]

And I think the University of Leeds and other scientists should complete the experiment to conclusion.
You may think that.
They think that there are better things to do with their limited funds.
Only one viewpoint can be right.
Do you think it is more likely to be the viewpoint of a university full of clever people, or a person posting nonsense on the web?

And I think physicists repress the results of the experiment to protect funds, jobs, careers and reputations of many scientists. #ResultsRequired

Imagine, for the sake of argument that something about your idea caught my attention and that I worked in the kind of metrology lab that could reasonably do the experiment.
OK so I go to my boss and I say " I saw this idea on the internet. There's a bloke who thinks that hot things weigh less than cold things".
It's likely that my boss will say "He's an idiot- we would have noticed" but, just for a moment, lets assume you are lucky and he says "well- if you can be bothered to waste your lunch hour on it, that's fine by me. Just remember to get the real work done before you go home."

So I do the experiment.
And- here's the bit that stretches  credibility- imagine that I actually find an apparent effect.

Well, what happens when I tell the boss about it?
Either he says "that's interesting- check if the result's real" or he says " dear me; we can't be finding out new stuff. Stop it at once".

Well, in one case he ends up with his name on a paper that wins me a Nobel prize, and in the other case, he doesn't.

What does he have to lose by choosing the sensible, scientific, path?

That's the reason why so many "conspiracy theories" like this are daft.

Scientists want to rock the boat, discover interesting things and get famous (not to mention rich).

[Yaniv (OP)]

What does he have to lose by choosing the sensible, scientific, path?

Maybe he can't bare the thought of sharing the Nobel Prize with me and my name remembered for a long, long time for theorizing this prediction ?

[The Spoon]

What does he have to lose by choosing the sensible, scientific, path?

Maybe he can't bare the thought of sharing the Nobel Prize with me and my name remembered for a long, long time for theorizing this prediction ?

So you think the scientist in question would rather remain anonymous than share a Nobel prize. That really is clutching batshit insane conspiracy theory straws.

[Bored chemist]

What does he have to lose by choosing the sensible, scientific, path?

Maybe he can't bare the thought of sharing the Nobel Prize with me and my name remembered for a long, long time for theorizing this prediction ?

As a scientist, you suffer from delusions of adequacy.

[Yaniv (OP)]

As a scientist, you suffer from delusions of adequacy.

And as a scientist, you keep missing the ball. #ResultsRequired

[The Spoon]

As a scientist, you suffer from delusions of adequacy.

And as a scientist, you keep missing the ball. #ResultsRequired

Yeah? but at least he is a scientist.

[Yaniv (OP)]

Yeah, but at least he is a scientist.

Who doesn't care about results.

[The Spoon]

Yeah, but at least he is a scientist.

Who doesn't care about results.

But the point is that you have no results. You also seem to believe in rather convoluted nutty conspiracy theories about scientists suppressing results because they may not want to share a Nobel prize with you.

[Kryptid]

Conspiracy fiction or conspiracy fact ? #ResultsRequired

Fiction until demonstrated to be fact.

[Yaniv (OP)]

But the point is that you have no results. You also seem to believe in rather convoluted nutty conspiracy theories about scientists suppressing results because they may not want to share a Nobel prize with you.

I think the primary reasons scientists are not interested to publish the results are loss of funding for many projects in theoretical physics and loss of jobs, careers and reputations.

[The Spoon]

Maybe he can't bare the thought of sharing the Nobel Prize with me and my name remembered for a long, long time for theorizing this prediction ?

You said:
'Maybe he can't bare the thought of sharing the Nobel Prize with me and my name remembered for a long, long time for theorizing this prediction ?'
Which is batshit insane. Even for a conspiracy theorist.