[guest39538]

5da.jpg (44.59 kB . 759x402 - viewed 1216 times)

 

[guest39538]

Learn this Mr Chemist , it is the absolute model that does not have any bs involved .  xyzt is a shortfall model , I've completed it .

[Bored chemist]

I'm glad it's complete.
Now all you need to do is find someone who thinks it means anything.


Go on...

[guest39538]

I'm glad it's complete.
Now all you need to do is find someone who thinks it means anything.


Go on...

Well if you think it doesn't mean anything then you don't know physics ,  The model is based on all present information and theory  and is accrediting to several scientists from our past . 

You'd have to disagree with physics to disagree with the model .  It works very well , it covers the big bang singularity , space-time, BH's , atoms, gases , light , energy ., gravity , time, motion , fields .

It is the model of everything Mr Chemist and it works .

[Bored chemist]

find someone who thinks it means anything

[guest39538]

find someone who thinks it means anything

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

[Bored chemist]

find someone who thinks it means anything

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

find someone who thinks it means anything

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

Because it's not wrong maybe ?

I know I'm correct my version is far superior to your present version , my version accredits my entire theory of everything to several scientists of our past , so how can it be wrong when it is all their work put into a tidy little parcel that explains everything ?

If only you could see their work like I see it ...It very good you should know , they were pretty good .

added- You read about what they thought , I think about what they thought , I think like them , all of them .

Q / 0ⁿ = V  oh my 

F=<E = G  oh my 

∑F(G) = >E→←<E  & <E→←>E

And the singularity stress is  V ⊕ <E

Added- When you're ready for quantum buoyancy , let me know


air.jpg (20.86 kB . 759x402 - viewed 994 times)

[Bored chemist]

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

my version accredits my entire theory of everything to several scientists of our past , so how can it be wrong when it is all their work put into a tidy little parcel that explains everything ?

Hmm, I'll repeat this again as obviously you're not reading very well this evening ,

my version accredits my entire theory of everything to several scientists of our past , so how can it be wrong when it is all their work put into a tidy little parcel that explains everything ?

[Bored chemist]

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

Why do you keep saying stuff that is correct is wrong ? Are you really a troll Mr Chemist as you don't seem actually seem to discuss science at all ?

[Bored chemist]

Why do you keep saying stuff that is correct is wrong ?

I don't

Are you really a troll Mr Chemist as you don't seem actually seem to discuss science at all ?

It is essentially impossible to discuss science with someone who can't follow basic logic so...

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

It is essentially impossible to discuss science with someone who can't follow basic logic so...

You are correct it is impossible to discuss with you . I've never really noticed before but your some what a troll with your spamming posts of repeat . 
You even got me doing it in reply to your antics . 

I don't need you to tell me theory is correct because I know it is correct .  xyzt is practically a scalar model without the integer of energy and the replacement of time with entropy .

I guarantee you Mr C that if  I froze myself and returned in 20 years , I'd have aged 20 years less than you but we'd have experienced the exact same amount of time .

You know very little about time , space and the universe , I don't know why I waste my time in replying to you.

Perhaps you need a holiday , why not get on a flight and go somewhere hot , I heard Tucson Arizona is quite hot . 

 

[guest39538]

It won't be long now , I have another science forum helping me with my maths and I already have the main equation I need .

1 /x = y  where x is greater than 1 and y is less than 1


This equation is everything ….

[Bored chemist]

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

You post stuff that is wrong all the time when you defend dogma such as time dilation . You really should study maths as well

=4/3 π r³ / t

My simple 5d model maths for example .

[Bored chemist]

Do you actually understand what the problem is with what you wrote here?

I will post this bit again in the hope that you read it this time.

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

If that was true (spoiler alert; it's not) then there wouldn't be any point posting on a science web page.
Yet you do.
So you know it's not true.
So why post stuff you know is wrong?

[guest39538]

Do you actually understand what the problem is with what you wrote here?

Yes , you are clueless .

[Bored chemist]

Do you remember writing this?

Now we all know science will never allow anything to mean anything other than their made up stuff.

And do you still think it is true?