[seeker3 (OP)]

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's force, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and matter B there exists an universal repulsion force

What you are ignoring is that the strength of Coulomb attraction between electrons and protons is so great that wherever you have a collection of electrons (eg on the surface of a star), in that same cubic millimeter you have almost exactly the same number of protons.

This means that the net electrical charge of that cubic milimeter is zero. The same applies to the surface of the Moon - zero net charge.

That means that the repulsive force you are hypothesising does not exist for macroscopic objects like stars, planets or Moons.

This repulsive force only exists when you exert a large amount of energy to remove a few electrons from some material, such as with a Van der Graaf generator. This might cause someone's hair to stand on end for a few seconds or a few minutes. But the attraction between protons and electrons is so great that the charge will quickly leak away, leaving the surface of everything electrically neutral again.

Even if you do manage to separate a few electrons and protons within a room (eg with a Van der Graaf generator), the room as a whole is still electrically neutral. So these long-range electrostatic forces do not exist.

The attraction force between proton and electron is so strong, how can the electron and proton don't stick together? What force or mechanism to separate them?

Electrons are on the surface of all atoms is fact. Electrons repel each other with Coulomb's force is fact. Therefore levity is fact.

You think 500 professors know less then you? Why they all keep quite?

[Kryptid]

The attraction force between proton and electron is so strong, how can the electron and proton don't stick together? What force or mechanism to separate them?

This has already been explained to you multiple times.

You think 500 professors know less then you? Why they all keep quite?

Because they aren't going to waste their time trying to deal with someone who is so obviously anti-science.

[seeker3 (OP)]

If you are truth seeker, you should copy my letter or take my theory to ask your professors or top scientists.

Find out what answers you will get.

Why argue with me? I have no degree. No credit. Just theory.

I asked on reddit, they blocked my question, why?

[Kryptid]

If you are truth seeker, you should copy my letter or take my theory to ask your professors or top scientists.

The answers are already known and they contradict what you say. So taking your anti-science assertions to anyone would be a waste of time.

Why argue with me? I have no degree. No credit. Just theory.

It's not even a theory. It's speculation that is known to be wrong.

I asked on reddit, they blocked my question, why?

Probably for the same reason that you didn't get a response from any of those professors: your ideas are just plain wrong and  you won't accept that fact.

[seeker3 (OP)]

What is light?

Light is energy, energy must coexist with matter. There is no light in the space between hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth.

All scientists thought light is EM wave or photon particle or both traveling in space at light speed. They are all wrong. There is no wave, no photon, nothing traveling in space at light speed. Energy teleport from matter to matter instantly, becomes light wave traveling in medium at light speed. Light speed in vacuum space is infinite. Therefore, cosmology, relativity, QM and electromagnetism are all wrong.

By using MIT 10 trillion frame per second high speed camera, scientists can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite. But they won't do it, because if the truth is out, they will be in big trouble.

Electromagnetic Radiation

Electrons are on the surface of all matters. Electrons are constantly vibrating due to the thermal energy atoms carried. The higher temperature the higher vibration frequency.

Vibrating electrons carry kinetic energy, that energy can transfer to distant electrons through the repulsion force between line of sight electrons F=Ke x ee/R^2, science call it electromagnetic radiation. In Fact, there is only electrostatic radiation, there is no electromagnetic radiation.

How to prove it?

Electrostatic force decays at 1/R^2, light wave strength decays at 1/R^2, Magnetic force decays at 1/R^3.

Photoelectric effect is misinterpretation. Light wave energy density is proportional to frequency. When light wave frequency is high enough, electrons will be vibrating out from solar cell.

There is no photon particle impact electron and knock it out from atoms.

That's why Einstein said he knows NOT what are light quanta. Everyone thinks he knows it is mistaken.

The first person to do a double slit experiment in vacuum, prove there is no light wave in vacuum space, can win a Nobel and change the history.

If you have the access, you should take this unique opportunity in history..

Put the slits and screen on the walls of a square glass container. Point a laser beam on the slits, video the light wave interference on the screen. Then vacuum the container, video the interference disappear and left two bright lines on the screen as if light act as particle.

In fact, light is not wave nor particle, light is vibrating electrostatic force carry by vibrating electrons/atoms.

Please make sure the slits and the screen are on the inside of the container walls. Nothing is between the slits and screen. No air, no glass, only empty space.

[Kryptid]

But they won't do it, because if the truth is out, they will be in big trouble.

Nobody will be in trouble.

[Bored chemist]

they blocked my question, why?

because it's sh1t.

[Bored chemist]

Admit it seeker 3.
You know you are wrong.
That's why you refuse to answer my points.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Why Reddit blocked my question?

I asked 500 top physics professors the same question, not 1 reply, why?

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/anw1i9/i_think_i_discovered_a_new_force_how_do_you_think/

[Kryptid]

Why Reddit blocked my question?

I asked 500 top physics professors the same question, not 1 reply, why?

We've already answered these questions. You need to stop asking the same question more than once. Are you expecting the answers to change when you ask a second or third time?

[seeker3 (OP)]

Reddit even removed my question. Very strange. Blocked is not enough?

[Kryptid]

Reddit even removed my question. Very strange. Blocked is not enough?

What you were posting was anti-science on a science message board. So it's not surprising that they got rid of it.

[seeker3 (OP)]

So an-ti science is the reason those 500 professors refuse to answer my question?

Few would tell me my mistake, maybe? Those are top guys.

[Kryptid]

So an-ti science is the reason those 500 professors refuse to answer my question?

Few would tell me my mistake, maybe? Those are top guys.

They probably predicted (and accurately, at that) that you wouldn't listen to their corrections.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Even you pointed out many many of my mistakes.

They should know a little more than you, agree?

[Kryptid]

Even you pointed out many many of my mistakes.

Yes, but the problem is that you always ignore your mistakes. Which is exactly why those professors weren't going to bother trying to debate with you.

They should know a little more than you, agree?

Knowing more than me doesn't mean that they are willing to waste their time trying to debate with you.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Why would you waste your time debating?

[Kryptid]

Why would you waste your time debating?

Because I have a lot of free time, unlike those professors.

[seeker3 (OP)]

So you are wasting free time debating to kill time, not learning for truth?

[Kryptid]

So you are wasting free time debating to kill time, not learning for truth?

I learn in my free time as well.