Does science think we are all stupid as they create more lies ?

guest39538 · « **Reply #60 on:** 13/04/2019 04:33:06 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:27:49

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:22:16
No , the accretion disk does not produce visible light or you could take a real photo .

So now you deny that super-heated plasma glows in the visible spectrum...

The reason why we can't take photographs of M87* with a conventional camera is the because the black hole and accretion disk have an angular diameter that is far too small. You wouldn't be able to see it that way. You might as well be arguing that a gnat on top of a mesa on the horizon must not reflect visible light because you can't take a picture of it with a handheld camera from your vantage point.

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:22:16
I have told you all before that science is not all that and has lots of things wrong .

Yes, you've said a lot of anti-scientific nonsense.

Actually , scientific investigation revealing their nonsense and money scams .

A secret society of scientists , them , they , it . No more accepting their bs .

I've just destroyed an expanding universe , you have no evidence at all now I've just destroyed Hubble , I was going to leave that be , but as science treats me so bad , I intend to make them look stupid as they are .

Kryptid · « **Reply #61 on:** 13/04/2019 04:35:54 »

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:33:06

Actually , scientific investigation revealing their nonsense and money scams .

A secret society of scientists , them , they , it . No more accepting their bs .

I've just destroyed an expanding universe , you have no evidence at all now I've just destroyed Hubble , I was going to leave that be , but as science treats me so bad , I intend to make them look stupid as they are .

Spoken like a true conspiracy theorist.

guest39538 · « **Reply #62 on:** 13/04/2019 04:38:09 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:35:54

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:33:06
Actually , scientific investigation revealing their nonsense and money scams .

A secret society of scientists , them , they , it . No more accepting their bs .

I've just destroyed an expanding universe , you have no evidence at all now I've just destroyed Hubble , I was going to leave that be , but as science treats me so bad , I intend to make them look stupid as they are .

Spoken like a true conspiracy theorist.

Spoken like a true scientist who doesn't do bs . The redshift of the Hubble observation is the telescope end , not the object end .

Kryptid · « **Reply #63 on:** 13/04/2019 04:40:01 »

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:38:09

who doesn't do bs

The irony is overwhelming.

guest39538 · « **Reply #64 on:** 13/04/2019 04:43:16 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:40:01

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:38:09
who doesn't do bs

The irony is overwhelming.

There is no BS in my science , I say what I observe not what I don't observe .

The inverse square law , by time light reaches the telescope it has naturally redshifted because of the inverse .

Quite obvious really .

Kryptid · « **Reply #65 on:** 13/04/2019 04:45:57 »

You say this:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:43:16

There is no BS in my science

Then you turn right around and contradict yourself by saying this:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:43:16

The inverse square law , by time light reaches the telescope it has naturally redshifted because of the inverse .

guest39538 · « **Reply #66 on:** 13/04/2019 04:48:26 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:45:57

You say this:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:43:16
There is no BS in my science

Then you turn right around and contradict yourself by saying this:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:43:16
The inverse square law , by time light reaches the telescope it has naturally redshifted because of the inverse .

No , consider a distant object , the light from the object coming towards you weakens in magnitude and intensity because of the inverse .

Kryptid · « **Reply #67 on:** 13/04/2019 04:50:42 »

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:48:26

No , consider a distant object , the light from the object coming towards you weakens in magnitude and intensity because of the inverse .

You understand neither the inverse square law nor redshift.

guest39538 · « **Reply #68 on:** 13/04/2019 04:54:36 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:50:42

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:48:26
No , consider a distant object , the light from the object coming towards you weakens in magnitude and intensity because of the inverse .

You understand neither the inverse square law nor redshift.

Of course not, you would say that . Did you know that the doppler redshift of distant bodies would be a sign of contraction , not expansion ?
White light has to be compressed to form a wavelength not expanded

Understand , the magnitude of light hitting the hubble lens only has sufficient force to be red .

Kryptid · « **Reply #69 on:** 13/04/2019 04:55:40 »

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:54:36

Did you know that the doppler redshift of distant bodies would be a sign of contraction , not expansion ?
White light has to be compressed to form a wavelength not expanded

Yep, sounds like your usual gibberish.

guest39538 · « **Reply #70 on:** 13/04/2019 04:58:24 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:55:40

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:54:36
Did you know that the doppler redshift of distant bodies would be a sign of contraction , not expansion ?
White light has to be compressed to form a wavelength not expanded

Yep, sounds like your usual gibberish.

Red shift is the light hitting the lens on Hubble and compressing to see red .

Kryptid · « **Reply #71 on:** 13/04/2019 05:00:20 »

This post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:58:24

Red shift is the light hitting the lens on Hubble and compressing to see red .

And this post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:54:36

Did you know that the doppler redshift of distant bodies would be a sign of contraction , not expansion ?
White light has to be compressed to form a wavelength not expanded

Contradict this post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:38:09

Spoken like a true scientist who doesn't do bs .

guest39538 · « **Reply #72 on:** 13/04/2019 05:03:41 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 05:00:20

This post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:58:24
Red shift is the light hitting the lens on Hubble and compressing to see red .

And this post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:54:36
Did you know that the doppler redshift of distant bodies would be a sign of contraction , not expansion ?
White light has to be compressed to form a wavelength not expanded

Contradict this post:

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:38:09
Spoken like a true scientist who doesn't do bs .

No , I was getting the point across . Hubble is not an actual observation , again the redshift is data driven . The data of redshift is the telescope end , they have created observer affect .

Kryptid · « **Reply #73 on:** 13/04/2019 05:07:17 »

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 05:03:41

No , I was getting the point across .

The point that you've made is that you don't understand the physics of light.

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 05:03:41

Hubble is not an actual observation , again the redshift is data driven . The data of redshift is the telescope end , they have created observer affect .

You keep contradicting your earlier assertion...

guest39538 · « **Reply #74 on:** 13/04/2019 05:09:03 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 05:07:17

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 05:03:41
No , I was getting the point across .

The point that you've made is that you don't understand the physics of light.

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 05:03:41
Hubble is not an actual observation , again the redshift is data driven . The data of redshift is the telescope end , they have created observer affect .

You keep contradicting your earlier assertion...

I don't .

Redshifting light entering a telescope does not mean anything other than that. Hubble data is the light that's entered the telescope not the light of the object changing .

Kryptid · « **Reply #75 on:** 13/04/2019 05:12:15 »

And you wonder why other people don't take you seriously...

guest39538 · « **Reply #76 on:** 13/04/2019 05:13:51 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 05:12:15

And you wonder why other people don't take you seriously...

Its 5.13 am here , I've not been asleep yet , sorry if my explanation is a bit crap , fuzzy brain lol .

guest39538 · « **Reply #77 on:** 13/04/2019 05:20:08 »

When somebody finally takes me serious , I'll get proper serious and we can go straight into experiments . I have lots and lots of experiments to do .

guest39538 · « **Reply #78 on:** 13/04/2019 05:29:22 »

How about active camouflage ? Somebody must want something to vanish .

added- energy weapon ? Plasma fusion ?

Big bangs ?

super subs ?

super boats ?

spaceship ?

Ray guns ? (sort of)

I can separate time from space if you'd like . More use than simulated BH pics put it that way .

Bored chemist · « **Reply #79 on:** 13/04/2019 12:29:40 »

Quote from: Kryptid on 13/04/2019 04:50:42

Quote from: Thebox on 13/04/2019 04:48:26
No , consider a distant object , the light from the object coming towards you weakens in magnitude and intensity because of the inverse .

You understand neither the inverse square law nor redshift.

It's a much longer list than that.

"DNA Diets" : Are they junk science? Started by mydietingwayBoard General Science	Replies: 3 Views: 5016	25/06/2016 19:07:01 by kasparovitch
Can you still donate your body to science? Are there any "bits" they don't want? Started by paul.frBoard General Science	Replies: 11 Views: 12467	07/06/2007 07:27:35 by Karen W.
"Simple" Rocket Science: Where have I gone wrong? Started by harrogate22Board General Science	Replies: 2 Views: 7111	06/01/2008 16:33:26 by lyner
Simple Motor - Homopolar motor - Kitchen Science Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology	Replies: 0 Views: 4787	24/11/2016 23:55:16 by thedoc
How realistic is the science on "Star Trek" (and other SF?) Started by cluelessBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology	Replies: 25 Views: 4247	09/03/2020 17:53:01 by instagyu

Does science think we are all stupid as they create more lies ?

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

guest39538

Similar topics (5)