0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 21/07/2019 18:06:35Do you want to be more clever than Einstein?This is possible. .Sure.
Do you want to be more clever than Einstein?This is possible. .
3- Never mind the relativity method; directly use outer space as a common reference frame for the motion relation of a photon and its source.
We human arrived energy based paradigm instead of material based physics.
2- A link for more (only 3 pages): http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0044
- Never mind the relativity method; directly use outer space as a common reference frame for the motion relation of a photon and its source.
Quick question; Do you understand that, in every test that has ever been done, GR gives the correct answer?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 09:03:38Quick question; Do you understand that, in every test that has ever been done, GR gives the correct answer?Specifically, it's a question to which I'd like an answer- either yes or no.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 10:48:39Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 09:03:38Quick question; Do you understand that, in every test that has ever been done, GR gives the correct answer?Specifically, it's a question to which I'd like an answer- either yes or no.
Also, please note."obturator"
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 16:19:58Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 10:48:39Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/10/2019 09:03:38Quick question; Do you understand that, in every test that has ever been done, GR gives the correct answer?Specifically, it's a question to which I'd like an answer- either yes or no.I'd like to know the answer to this too.
Probably, you claims that the tests of GR verifies/protects the SR.
In my opinion, naked scientists must not confine himself to this "yes".
A comparing material for Muon lifetime is inevitable. If not, you cannot know/detect the increasing of natural muons' lifetime; and attetion for that point: the speeds of natural muons and lab. mouns (comparison material) are a big fraction of c; as if, they are equal. So this reality cannot explain the effect of SR. Sometimes, scientific articles may include similar wrong interpretation ( e.g. please remember the Cold fusion case in Nature Journals) . No problem for people who convinced.
The forum policy may forbid to discuss SR and GR like a religion or basic law. And I'll be enlightened that the date is early yet for new alternative theories, advanced horizontals about light kinematics and cosmology.
please remember the Cold fusion case in Nature Journals
The forum policy may forbid to discuss SR and GR like a religion or basic law.
However, publicated articles are sufficient for people who wants to believe. Nobody gets upset. SR is already a publicated article. Why do we discuss?