[Kryptid]

Unconscious mind or not, it doesn't matter how you came up with your "solutions". What matters is whether they are supported by any actual evidence.

When they are able to build the proton thruster engine which readily turns protons into photons of light speed Co and light speed Cs energy, then what I say will be proven.

This is another assertion sans evidence. How do you know that such an engine will ever be built? And what about that falsifiable prediction I asked for?

[jerrygg38]

I think the quantum entanglement experiments show light speed Co is not the top speed of the universe. Also the rapid expansion of the universe right after big bang had to be greater than light speed Co. My only conclusions are that there is a fifth dimension of light speed Cs. In addition the scientists say the universe is growing dark. That is evidence that the universe is disappearing. Therefore we are returning to another dimension.

[jerrygg38]

To Kryptoid
   I just take all the scientific evidence others have produced and put it into my dual mind. Then I come to solutions based upon the experimental data that is available to me. I do not make the data up. I just accept some of the data and use it. Can I falsify the experiments of others? If I was a physicist then I would have greater ability to be there. Yet I am a problem solver engineer. I take the data and produce models of the universe and study them. Then I attack the models with my dual brain. String theory is strange to me but it does explain that we are part of a higher universe. I agree with that.
   My methods are simple engineering type methods. Data in solutions out.
   And I study many alternate solutions and pick the most likely solution.
   The thing is that it appears to me that light speed Cs is interconnected with light speed Co. That makes it very difficult to readily separate them. And the only proof will be the machine that destroys the protons by means of a mini black hole. But scientists are attempting to do this right now. Once this is done then we will have abundant clean nuclear power. IN my book I explain how to do it but others will do it. Then people will have to wonder what happens in a black hole. I say it eats up the universe and sends huge amounts of energy into the Cs dimension. Someday they will come to this conclusion. Time will tell and then a hundred years from now people will wonder how I got these answers. It all came from my unconscious mind.

[Kryptid]

I think the quantum entanglement experiments show light speed Co is not the top speed of the universe. Also the rapid expansion of the universe right after big bang had to be greater than light speed Co.

It is the top speed at which information can travel, though.

My only conclusions are that there is a fifth dimension of light speed Cs.

An irrational conclusion, since quantum entanglement and spatial expansion don't behave at all like some form of super-fast light.

In addition the scientists say the universe is growing dark. That is evidence that the universe is disappearing.

Someone turning a light bulb off is not evidence that the light bulb disappeared.

Therefore we are returning to another dimension.

Non-sequitur.

To Kryptoid

Are you trying to be disparaging by calling me "Kryptoid" instead of "Kryptid"?

Can I falsify the experiments of others?

I wasn't asking you to falsify the experiments of others. I was asking you to think of a potential way to falsify your own model. If no experiment could be performed that had the potential to show your model false, then your model is not scientific. Relativity, for example, is falsifiable because it makes quantifiable predictions that could potentially be discovered to be wrong by experiment. If the experiment came up with results at odds with the prediction, then that would be a falsification of relativity. So how about your model? What kind of experiment might be able to show that your Cs light speed doesn't exist?

[jerrygg38]

Conversation with Kryptid
GG: I think the quantum entanglement experiments show light speed Co is not the top speed of the universe. Also the rapid expansion of the universe right after big bang had to be greater than light speed Co.
Kryptid: It is the top speed at which information can travel, though.
GG: I do not know. If true then I am wrong. Time will tell if information by itself can be transmitted via the fifth dimension. I believe it can. But some scientists believe it can be done and are hoping for a new type quantum computer.
GG:
My only conclusions are that there is a fifth dimension of light speed Cs.
Kryptid:
An irrational conclusion, since quantum entanglement and spatial expansion don't behave at all like some form of super-fast light.
GG: That is just a model I use to explain it. My dot-waves oscillate between dimensions. When some of them radiate into the Cs dimension they travel at light speed Cs. They expand the universe and produce the quantum entanglement interactions. Finding the right words to describe them is very difficult for me to do. To model them like a photon is the best I can do even though I know they are more complex. Yet that is the job for some future mathematicians.
GG: In addition the scientists say the universe is growing dark. That is evidence that the universe is disappearing.
Kryptid: Someone turning a light bulb off is not evidence that the light bulb disappeared.
GG: From a philosophical viewpoint, the universe exists today and it will repeat itself in the far future. Therefore we will not turn cold and grow dark forever. We will return over and over again forever.
GG: Therefore we are returning to another dimension.
Kryptoid: Non-sequitur.
GG: It is all in line with my models of the universe. To me it is the most likely solution. Yet many other solutions are possible.

GG: To Kryptoid
Kryptid: Are you trying to be disparaging by calling me "Kryptoid" instead of "Kryptid"?
GG: Sorry. I am terrible with names and I do not have a very good short term memory. So when I think of you I write the word that flows easily.  Perhaps if you tell me what Kryptid means it will help me remember your correct spelling?
GG: Can I falsify the experiments of others?
Kryptid: I wasn't asking you to falsify the experiments of others. I was asking you to think of a potential way to falsify your own model. If no experiment could be performed that had the potential to show your model false, then your model is not scientific. Relativity, for example, is falsifiable because it makes quantifiable predictions that could potentially be discovered to be wrong by experiment. If the experiment came up with results at odds with the prediction, then that would be a falsification of relativity. So how about your model? What kind of experiment might be able to show that your Cs light speed doesn't exist?
GG: My engineering models give the age of the universe since big bang at 13.78 billion years. It gives the cycle time of the universe as 1088 billion years. It says that the Bohr orbit is expanding at a velocity of1.21667E-28 meters per second. It says that the smallest charge in the universe is 3.4711E-60 coulombs. Is it possible for anyone to disprove my calculations from my models? It says that the three light speed unit equations are E = MCC, E = QCCC, and M=QC.
    My models are for my most likely universe. They provide a complete solution to a universe of a primary light speed Co which is radiating energy into the Cs dimension. Can I find ways to falsify my model? My models are only as good as the scientific and astronomical data available to me at the time.
   I am dealing with the universe that cannot be readily seen and measured. Science is dealing with the universe that can be see and measured. So I give you a solution that my unconscious mind sees and transmits to my conscious mind. Is it true?  Perhaps, perhaps not. So I present my models to various professors of math and physics around the world. So far several have read my work and it was not good enough for them but at least they commented on it to me. So I have given up on a single light speed solution. And now I will send out my dual light speed solution.
   Anyway you raise good points and I appreciate that. All I try to do is to reduce the conflict between my conscious mind and my unconscious mind. Then I will be at peace. At 81 years I do not have much longer to battle within myself.