0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Rockets don't have to push off of an atmosphere or any such thing.
The OP is just trolling for giggles. I wonder who it it could be...
I don't believe you ! Please provide evidence of a rocket propulsion in a test vacuum?
Please provide evidence of a rocket propulsion in a test vacuum?
Why would the admiral say such a thing about a new land if it were not true ?
how could a rocket NOT generate thrust in a vacuum?
Quote from: Starlight on 21/02/2020 13:05:45Why would the admiral say such a thing about a new land if it were not true ?Why has only one person ever seen it?
exhaust gases -v(e) = free fall
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/02/2020 13:16:06 how could a rocket NOT generate thrust in a vacuum? [ Invalid Attachment ] When the rocket and the stick is falling !
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/02/2020 13:20:38Quote from: Starlight on 21/02/2020 13:05:45Why would the admiral say such a thing about a new land if it were not true ?Why has only one person ever seen it?Hmmmm , I doubt only one person has seen it !
If you do decide to ban me , I'll consider that a victory
Quote from: Starlight on 20/02/2020 15:57:12 If you do decide to ban me , I'll consider that a victoryAs will we all, a victory in sanity...
Relativity would not ''allow'' a rocket module to land on the moon safely using conventional thinking .
Additionally nobody as yet given specific thought to the Suns path and the fact that Australia would be down under and observe no Sunlight from a Sun that ''hung'' above a Northern hemisphere .
I'd like to see what sort of backwards answers you're going to provide to this as science is never straight forward .
It pretty much spends its time nearly over the equator.
That's an impossibility as from the UK I can observe the Suns angle and path , the telemetry not seemingly inline with the equator .