[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force

[Bored chemist]

I already pointed out that I know what the coriolis force is.

The Coriolis happens when you travel in what seems like a straight line on the surface of a rotating object.

So I don't need some fool to post a wiki link.

However what I asked was this

What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

And I'm starting to think that the reason you don't answer is that either you don't know, or it is some nonsense you made up, and it means nothing.

On earth, volcanic mountains 5-6 km high., Formed when the Earth rotated much faster. Now, due to a decrease in the speed of the earth, the geological activity of the earth has also decreased.

Everest is 8 km high and rising.

Do you not realise that people can just google stuff like that and show that your ideas are absurdly wrong?

[The Spoon]

Also your assertion:
'Now, due to the low geological activity of the earth, lava cannot break through to the surface of the earth and new volcanoes do not form'

On earth, volcanic mountains 5-6 km high., Formed when the Earth rotated much faster. Now, due to a decrease in the speed of the earth, the geological activity of the earth has also decreased.

So geology is something else  you know nothing about then? You are just making yourself look even more stupid.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

The Coriolis happens when you travel in what seems like a straight line on the surface of a rotating object.

The Coriolis effect occurs when an object approaches or moves away from the axis of the Earth, or the Sun, in a straight line, or along a curve.
Rivers and trains moving along a curve. In a straight line, nothing moves in nature.

The earth is not flat.

[The Spoon]

The Coriolis happens when you travel in what seems like a straight line on the surface of a rotating object.

The Coriolis effect occurs when an object approaches or moves away from the axis of the Earth, or the Sun, in a straight line, or along a curve.
Rivers and trains moving along a curve. In a straight line, nothing moves in nature.

The earth is not flat.

Why have you removed your previous post from 22.38 yesterday which is quoted above and does not define coriolis force but is just obfuscation?
Also, nobody on here said the earth was flat so stop posting nonsense, as you are making yourself look even more stupid.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Are the stars hanging motionless over the poles of the galaxy?
a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.
b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

Who can answer this question.

[The Spoon]

7. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located, because they will quickly fall to the pole of the sun.
And the stars that are above the poles of the galaxy, for some reason, do not fall.

Who can answer this question. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

What question? You have shared a link to wikipedia page on galaxies - that is not a question.
Why dont you answer the questions above instead of trying to distract attention from your many failings?

[Bored chemist]

The question might be "why am I so wrong about this?

There are no answers to the following questions:
...
7. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located, because they will quickly fall to the pole of the sun.

even after people have explained circumpolar orbits to me"

[Kryptid]

Who can answer this question.

It's already been answered.

[Bored chemist]

The Coriolis happens when you travel in what seems like a straight line on the surface of a rotating object.

The Coriolis effect occurs when an object approaches or moves away from the axis of the Earth, or the Sun, in a straight line, or along a curve.
Rivers and trains moving along a curve. In a straight line, nothing moves in nature.

The earth is not flat.

Nobody said it was.

On the other hand, I did ask you a question.
I'd still like an answer.

What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Why have you removed your previous post from 22.38

There were two of them.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

This is a new idea. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

The question might be "why am I so wrong about this?

There are no answers to the following questions:
...
Are the stars hanging motionless over the poles of the galaxy?
a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.
b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

even after people have explained circumpolar orbits to me"

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

[The Spoon]

The question might be "why am I so wrong about this?

There are no answers to the following questions:
...
7. In the solar system, above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located, because they will quickly fall to the pole of the sun.
And the stars that are above the poles of the galaxy, for some reason, do not fall. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

even after people have explained circumpolar orbits to me"

Maybe this is levitation.

Seriously? Why do you post such utter crap?

[Bored chemist]

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

This is a new idea. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

Levitation is an old, but imaginary idea.

It has nothing to do with the Sun, or the Coriolis effect.

On the other hand, I did ask you a question.
I'd still like an answer.


Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/04/2020 15:18:05
What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

[The Spoon]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

Are you posting this as a joke or are you really that ignorant?

[Bored chemist]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

Comets continuously fall towards the Sun, but they miss.
That's what an orbit means.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/04/2020 15:18:05
What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Kryptid]

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

It isn't.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

It isn't.

How do you explain this?