[The Spoon]

The question might be "why am I so wrong about this?

There are no answers to the following questions:
...
7. In the solar system, above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located, because they will quickly fall to the pole of the sun.
And the stars that are above the poles of the galaxy, for some reason, do not fall. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

even after people have explained circumpolar orbits to me"

Maybe this is levitation.

Seriously? Why do you post such utter crap?

[Bored chemist]

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

This is a new idea. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

Levitation is an old, but imaginary idea.

It has nothing to do with the Sun, or the Coriolis effect.

On the other hand, I did ask you a question.
I'd still like an answer.


Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/04/2020 15:18:05
What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

[The Spoon]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

Are you posting this as a joke or are you really that ignorant?

[Bored chemist]

If not for the solar power of Coriolis, comets would have fallen on the Sun.

Comets continuously fall towards the Sun, but they miss.
That's what an orbit means.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/04/2020 15:18:05
What do you imagine that  "Coriolis Solar Effect." actually means?

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Kryptid]

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

It isn't.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

It isn't.

How do you explain this?

[Kryptid]

How do you explain this?

Why do you keep asking a question that has already been answered? Are you under the impression that answers change when you ask a question enough times?

[Bored chemist]

Maybe this is levitation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)

It isn't.

How do you explain this?

Do you mean how do I explain this tourist trap trick?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation_(paranormal)#/media/File%3ACzech-2013-Prague-Street_performers_(crop).jpg

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

How do you explain this?

Why do you keep asking a question that has already been answered?

No one has yet been able to answer this question and cannot.

"Are the stars hanging motionless over the poles of the galaxy?
a) This is called levitation, and contradicts elementary logic.
b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

[Kryptid]

No one has yet been able to answer this question and cannot.

Two words: circumpolar orbit.

And the stars that hang motionless above the poles of the galaxy

Please provide a reputable source that supports your assertion that those stars are motionless.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Your answer is a hidden form of recognition of the adversary.

[Bored chemist]

Your answer is a hidden form of recognition of the adversary.

No
Let's be clear; you are no "adversary", you are just some twit who keeps getting stuff wrong.

[Bored chemist]

And the stars that hang motionless above the poles of the galaxy,

Do you mean the pole star?
That's not in orbit round the Sun.

[The Spoon]

Your answer is a hidden form of recognition of the adversary.

It appears that you are both an idiot and deluded.

[Bored chemist]

Only a moron can call a person a fool.
I never call anyone a fool.

Why not?
It seems you think yourself qualified.

Anyway, how about you stop acting teh fool, and get on with answering this

We know what the Coriolis effect is.
I want to know why you have stuck the word "solar" into the middle of it.
In particular, why have you done that in the context of Io where the  effects are nothing to do with the Sun.

[Kryptid]

Your answer is a hidden form of recognition of the adversary.

I can't quite parse that in English.

I'll post this request again:

Please provide a reputable source that supports your assertion that those stars are motionless.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

To this question, I answered as best I could, I can’t think for you.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
a) And the stars, revolving around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.
b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.
c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, only in one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.
d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?
3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.
a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.
4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.

Who will be able to answer the next question.

[Bored chemist]

To this question, I answered as best I could, I can’t think for you.

So, you use the phrase

Coriolis Solar Force

repeatedly, but you can't tell us what it means.

Do you think that's a good way to communicate?