The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]   Go Down

The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe

  • 266 Replies
  • 34067 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yusup Hizirov (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 636
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #260 on: 21/07/2020 10:42:54 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 08:50:13
Come back to us when you have a formula that works for Venus and Mercury with eccentricities of 0.0068 and 0.2056 respectively.
You are the author of this formula, E = Vl / Vz = 27.3 / 365.2 = 0.0747
Now show how it works.
Logged
The stupider the hypothesis, the easier it is to refute it, provided that the opponent is not stupid!
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #261 on: 21/07/2020 11:43:49 »
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 10:42:54
You are the author of this formula
No,  I am not.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 08:50:13
Come back to us when you have a formula that works for Venus and Mercury with eccentricities of 0.0068 and 0.2056 respectively.

Don't come back with the same wrong formula because that's just trolling.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yusup Hizirov (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 636
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #262 on: 21/07/2020 12:15:57 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 11:43:49
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 10:42:54
You are the author of this formula
No,  I am not.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 08:50:13
Come back to us when you have a formula that works for Venus and Mercury with eccentricities of 0.0068 and 0.2056 respectively.

Don't come back with the same wrong formula because that's just trolling.
Venus and Mercury have no satellites.
Logged
The stupider the hypothesis, the easier it is to refute it, provided that the opponent is not stupid!
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 618
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #263 on: 21/07/2020 12:34:46 »
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 10:42:54
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 08:50:13
Come back to us when you have a formula that works for Venus and Mercury with eccentricities of 0.0068 and 0.2056 respectively.
You are the author of this formula, E = Vl / Vz = 27.3 / 365.2 = 0.0747
Now show how it works.
Why tell such a stupid obvious lie? It is becoming more and more apparent that you are trolling.
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #264 on: 21/07/2020 13:16:26 »
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 12:15:57
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 11:43:49
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 10:42:54
You are the author of this formula
No,  I am not.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 08:50:13
Come back to us when you have a formula that works for Venus and Mercury with eccentricities of 0.0068 and 0.2056 respectively.

Don't come back with the same wrong formula because that's just trolling.
Venus and Mercury have no satellites.
So what?
They are in orbit round the Sun.
So, when you can come up with a formula for their orbital eccentricities, let us know.
Otherwise just stop posting.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yusup Hizirov (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 636
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #265 on: 21/07/2020 13:27:40 »
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 23/02/2020 11:49:26
The Earth’s orbit is formed by the Galactic Coriolis force.
When the Earth, revolving around the Sun, approaches and moves away from the center of the galaxy at a speed of 30 km / s, the galactic Coriolis force stretches the Earth’s orbit along the orbit of the Sun, due to which the Earth’s orbit similar to the Lunar one should form. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_year https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
But the orbits of the planets are not stretched along the orbit of the Sun, which means that the Sun does not revolve around the center of the galaxy, but is in space, in a motionless state. https://m.habr.com/en/post/411567/
The objects of the solar system cannot endlessly revolve around numerous centers.
The laws of celestial mechanics are not omnipotent and are limited by the task of three bodies. The Earth revolves around the Sun, the Moon revolves around the Earth, and nothing revolves around the Moon. No natural planetary satellite has a permanent or temporary satellite, because this will be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of being.
In nature, there is no relationship without symbiosis, and in the center of the galaxy, the solar system does not need.
https://spaceworlds.ru/solnechnaya-sistema/orbity-planet.html
And the main question is why planetary satellites do not have satellites, and asteroids possess satellites. Despite the fact that asteroids are much smaller than planet satellites. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor-planet_moon
The two satellites of Saturn, Janus and Epimetheus, move in the same orbit, and overtake each other every four years.
If these two satellites revolved around the Sun, then Janus would capture Epimetheus. https://elementy.ru/kartinka_dnya/430/Tanets_Yanusa_i_Epimeteya
The statement that the ellipse of the planets is formed due to the disturbance of the planets does not correspond to reality, since Venus and Neptune move in a circular orbit.
The reason for the formation of the ellipse of the planets is beyond the cognitive capabilities of modern science.
« Last Edit: 21/07/2020 13:46:00 by Yusup Hizirov »
Logged
The stupider the hypothesis, the easier it is to refute it, provided that the opponent is not stupid!
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: The Coriolis Force on Earth and in the Universe
« Reply #266 on: 21/07/2020 17:21:00 »
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 13:27:40
The statement that the ellipse of the planets is formed due to the disturbance of the planets does not correspond to reality, since Venus and Neptune move in a circular orbit.
No, they do not.
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 21/07/2020 13:27:40
The reason for the formation of the ellipse of the planets is beyond the cognitive capabilities of modern science.
No, it is not.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/07/2020 13:16:26
So, when you can come up with a formula for their orbital eccentricities, let us know.
Otherwise just stop posting.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: coriolis  / effect  / hypothesis 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.158 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.