0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I got an impression that majority don't know the technical essence of SR from my former topic
Therefore I prepared an article that tells its essence easily and its effective flaw:
...If you want to say something then why not just say what it is so we can discuss it on this forum.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 23/02/2020 12:28:39I got an impression that majority don't know the technical essence of SR from my former topicThe majority got the impression that you don't understand it.Which is more likely?
I am not interested wasting my time on a site that that accepts any pseudoscience paper offered. If you want to say something then why not just say what it is so we can discuss it on this forum.
The stationary beaker will not change half life by pretending to be in motion, due to relative motion arguments.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 28/02/2020 08:59:04There are two important points to consider in this account of the theory:1- The uniqueness of the photon (due to its existence): The defined photon, which we use as a subject, is unique in the universe, its existence and instant position is unique. Everyone agrees, including Einstein, Lorentz, Poincaré, etc.This statement defies relativity and QM. Einstein for one would not say this, and neither would any physicist who knows the works of Bell. Lorentz would not have said it for other reasons, and I'm insufficiently familiar with Poincare's position to say if he'd actually agree to such a statement.Point is, dropping names doesn't supporting all the nonsense in this thread. No known physicist said that.
There are two important points to consider in this account of the theory:1- The uniqueness of the photon (due to its existence): The defined photon, which we use as a subject, is unique in the universe, its existence and instant position is unique. Everyone agrees, including Einstein, Lorentz, Poincaré, etc.
Einsten had used the set of Peron
Quote from: xersanozgen on 28/02/2020 08:59:04Einsten had used the set of PeronWhat is a "Peron"?
Sorry.Peron/Perron : The platform of railway station
But the theory SR says that: The person in the K' system perceives himself as immobile and uses the c value he finds when he measures the speed of light (he says "there is experimental evidence; I measured it"). In other words, if he measures the way of photon on the moment Tı (which will be the AB), he will think that the AB distance should be travelled by the speed c in a time between Tı - To. It will have to bend x' and t' to achieve this (x' / t' = c equation). Theory SR considers and analyses the photo of Tı instant; K' experimenter ignores the movement of OA way, because he is not aware his own motion on universal scale. But the outsiders (K system person) perceive the incident clearly; they cannot use a method like self-deception, they have no such luxury.
SR is fine, however data collection and the philosophy of science often require we apply SR in a way, that is not in touch with the reality of the needs for energy conservation.
If he is not aware that the view from the internal and actually relative system to the whole / event will may be caused wrong perceptions (such as "The Sun is rotating around the world")
The perception of the relative system (K') experimenter is wrong.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 29/02/2020 21:07:25 If he is not aware that the view from the internal and actually relative system to the whole / event will may be caused wrong perceptions (such as "The Sun is rotating around the world")1- The Earth orbiting the Sun is a case of accelerating motion, which (unlike inertial motion) is not relative. So it's a false analogy.Quote from: xersanozgen on 29/02/2020 21:07:25The perception of the relative system (K') experimenter is wrong.2- Wrong according to who? Relativity says all inertial frames are equally valid.
In the big picture, the world revolves around the sun and its own axis. In the order of universal structures, the world takes place in a subset of the sun. So the sun is the reference system; the world is in relative motion. Observing from the internal or relative object to the reference object causes false perception, and we think the sun revolves around the earth. Wrong perception and false stigma.