[Bored chemist]

There has been a lot of discussion on this topic about acceleration and gravity.
Last time I checked, SR didn't handle gravity; that's what GR is for.
So, is a large part of the discussion here irrelevant?

[xersanozgen (OP)]

 I found a person who agreed with me.


Falsification of Einstein Theories of Relativity  Prof. Lutz Kayser

Abstract:The Einstein Postulates of Special Relativity (SR), namely the invariance of the speed of light c relative to the observer, the symmetry of relative velocities, and the Galilean Principle independent of velocity and gravitational potential are falsified. The replacement Law is: There exists an absolute universal velocity reference (Cosmic Velocity Reference, CVR). The velocity of light c is invariant and isotropic only relative to absolute universal space CVR.......

Link: https://vixra.org/abs/1503.0187

[Kryptid]

Link: https://vixra.org/abs/1503.0187

Of course it's ViXra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViXra

Physicist Gerard 't Hooft writes, "When a paper is published in viXra, it is usually a sign that it is not likely to contain acceptable results. It may, but the odds against that are considerable"

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Link: https://vixra.org/abs/1503.0187

Of course it's ViXra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViXra

Physicist Gerard 't Hooft writes, "When a paper is published in viXra, it is usually a sign that it is not likely to contain acceptable results. It may, but the odds against that are considerable"

Scientific studies were previously published with peer-reviewed journals or books. The author needed a notary public record that the study was his own. Arxiv provided this need.

On the other hand, copyright restrictions of some refereed journals prevented these studies from being announced to the general public. This was a flaw for the information age.

My most important work (light kinematics to analyze space time) was published in a refereed journal. But I regret; I wish I would only posted on the Internet. Because,  still 1 / Ho based age account articles are produced;.although this study reveals the more effective age calculation for universe,

Of course, these internet resources (even forums) may not be suitable for amateur scientists who need referees. Those who are competent, who can use their own cognitive performance should read them.

So, you and other readers (forum followers) are a referee.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

I had focused on the flaws of the special theory of relativity (GR).  I reviewed  the general relativity theory*  because of presenting the GR as an evidence.

  I see the following:

1- Einstein emphasized that both are the same:
a) the wagon moves relative to the ground.
b) the floor moves according to the wagon.

(My note: This finding disrupts the twins paradox.)

2- If special relativity is correct, it should be also true for objects that do not move properly. (Some one said that if GR is right; SR is also right)

3- He concludes that the acceleration with gravity is identical / equivalent and concludes that light rays spread curvilinearly in the shooting areas. He says that this warp can be tried during solar eclipse.

4- It says that the clock on the edge of a rotating disc will run slower than the clock in the center and Lorentz transformations must be valid.

5- Thus, he says that the SR will gain generality.

I had indicated that light's path will be diagonal without accelerating (a = 0) in accordance with GR mentality (Please look at the figure). I agree the gravity bends the path of the light; but I know the acceleration is not effective for gravitational lens.

(*) http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5001

[Bored chemist]

The author needed a notary public record that the study was his own.

No.

[Bored chemist]

(My note: This finding disrupts the twins paradox.)

No, it doesn't.

[Bored chemist]

On the other hand, copyright restrictions of some refereed journals prevented these studies from being announced to the general public.

Printing in a journal- which you could get your local library to borrow for you was THE WAY IN WHICH STUDIES WERE ANNOUNCED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
It can not, therefor have been a way to prevent it.

[Kryptid]

I had indicated that light's path will be diagonal without accelerating (a = 0) in accordance with GR mentality (Please look at the figure).

That isn't correct. If an astronaut holds a flashlight on a spaceship, the beam will be straight regardless of whether the spaceship is standing still or moving at a constant speed. Conservation of momentum guarantees this. If an excited atom is moving upward at constant velocity, then emits a photon, then the photon must also have an upward component to its momentum in order to satisfy conservation of momentum. Relative to the observer that sees the atom moving upward, the photon will follow a diagonal path. Relative to the atom itself, the photon will appear to travel in a straight line (not diagonally).

[xersanozgen (OP)]

I had indicated that light's path will be diagonal without accelerating (a = 0) in accordance with GR mentality (Please look at the figure).

That isn't correct. If an astronaut holds a flashlight on a spaceship, the beam will be straight regardless of whether the spaceship is standing still or moving at a constant speed. Conservation of momentum guarantees this. If an excited atom is moving upward at constant velocity, then emits a photon, then the photon must also have an upward component to its momentum in order to satisfy conservation of momentum. Relative to the observer that sees the atom moving upward, the photon will follow a diagonal path. Relative to the atom itself, the photon will appear to travel in a straight line (not diagonally).

Einstein say that:"For example, we learn that a body which is in a state of uniform rectilinear motion with respect to K (in accordance with the law of Galilei) is executing an accelerated and in general curvilinear motion with respect to the accelerated reference-body K′ (chest). This acceleration or curvature corresponds to the influence on the moving body of the gravitational field prevailing relatively to K." (section 22 paragraf 2  http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5001 )


 
Attention please; you have found Eintein's a flaw.



Also, I had said according to GR mentality. Because Einstein connects the points where the source and the photon are located  at the moment T₂.  And he says, if the cabinet has an acceleration the light's path will be curved. With the same mentality, if acceleration is not mentioned, light's path will be diagonal.


Note: In order to avoid confusion, it should be considered that the orientation is given to the light with a perforated plate filter.

However, according to the LCS method, the correct light path  is the S'P₁ horizontal line (both status with and without acceleration).

Please look at the new figure. The test photon is on the point S' for the T₁ moment. It goes horizontal and arrives the point P₁ at the moment T₂. Is this transparent sufficiently?

[Kryptid]

With the same mentality, if acceleration is not mentioned, light's path will be diagonal.

No it won't, for the reason I stated.

[Bobolink]

Attention please; you have found Eintein's a flaw.

Your misunderstanding is not a flaw in General Relativity.

[hamdani yusuf]

With the same mentality, if acceleration is not mentioned, light's path will be diagonal.

No it won't, for the reason I stated.

What would it take to make light's path diagonal?

[Kryptid]

What would it take to make light's path diagonal?

Point the light source in that direction.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Of course, It is difficult to think  a technical analysis in four dimensions. Even Einstein was not skilled for this.

So I prepared sequential movie frames. In this figure, while the photons is emitted every consecutive atto second in the elevator car, the elevator cabinet goes up a little for every atto second.

As can be seen, the P₁ photon moves completely horizontally. This is a natural truth.

In the case of fixed elevator speed, the trace formed by the photons P₁,P₂, P₃, P₄,P ₅... is the diagonal (curve in acceleration) line.

When we remember that the experimental photon is unique, to consider the sequential photons' trace is a result of our poor cognitive ability. 

LCS (Light coordinate system) method determines that a photon always goes on a straight line. Gravity can bend this path. The accelerating of an object is not effective. Because The mentality of GR works at the case of fixed speeds (diagonal path). Look at the figure (attach) this figure clearly tells the event. Followers please register to see this figure.

[Kryptid]

Because The mentality of GR works at the case of fixed speeds (diagonal path).

Please stop repeating this incorrect statement.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

If you ask with google, you may find many text about flaws of SR.

Currently / anymore, it is significant who can analyze and explaine  the weakest point of special relativity. There is a contest about this.

[Bobolink]

Gravity can bend this path. The accelerating of an object is not effective. Because The mentality of GR works at the case of fixed speeds (diagonal path). Look at the figure (attach) this figure clearly tells the event.

The figure you drew was in perfect agreement with GR because the light source is in a different reference frame.  According to GR a person in a rocket flying away from earth at a constant .5c who shined a laser perpendicular to the direction of travel would see the laser light in a straight line.  It would look the same as someone with 0 velocity.

[Kryptid]

If you ask with google, you may find many text about flaws of SR.

I can find many texts about the benefits of homeopathy on Google, too.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Because The mentality of GR works at the case of fixed speeds (diagonal path).

Please stop repeating this incorrect statement.

I share new explanation for question. Please stop/leave similar warnings.