[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

The Coriolis effect occurs when an object approaches or moves away from the axis of the Earth.
At the same time, when an object that moves on the Earth approaches or moves away from the axis of the Sun, the Coriolis Solar Force arises.
The deflecting Coriolis Solar Force, due to the axial and orbital rotation of the Earth, is much more complicated.
The course of the Volga River is constantly pressed against the western bank of the river, by the force of the Coriolis Earth.
And the Coriolis Solar Force, due to the axial and orbital rotation of the Earth, deflects the Volga River first to the west coast, then to the east, twice a day.
For this reason, winding currents form in the seas and oceans.
The aforesaid can be easily verified by rotating the globe around the axis and in orbit. Wrapped along the equator and meridian with a plastic hose in which fluid moves. http://astrogalaxy1.narod.ru/astro016.html
The Coriolis effect of the Earth does not depend on the inclination of the axis of the earth, and the Solar Coriolis force depends.

The solar Coriolis effect is involved in the formation of the moon ellipse.
When the Moon revolving around the Earth in the last quarter approaches the Sun at a speed of 1 km / s, and in the first quarter moves away from the Sun at a speed of 1 km / s, the Coriolis solar force stretches the moon's orbit along the Earth's orbit, due to which an ellipse of the Moon is formed.
When the moon is in the phase of the new moon and the full moon, the solar Coriolis effect does not affect the orbit of the moon, because in these phases the moon does not approach and does not move away from the sun.

The eccentricity of the Moon's orbit can be calculated using the following formula. E = Vz / Vl = 0.0411 / 0.55 = 0.0747
Where Vz - Earth's orbital speed - 0.0411 degrees / hour.
Vl - Moon's orbital speed - 0.55 degrees / hour.
The eccentricity of the Moon's orbit can be calculated using the following formula.
E = (Vz / Sz) / (Vl / Sl) = 0.00071 / 0.0095 = 0.0747
Where Vz is the Earth's orbital speed - 107,218 km / h.
Sz - Distance from the Sun to the Earth - 150,000,000 km.
Where Vl is the Moon's orbital speed - 3683 km / h.
Sl - Distance from the Earth to the Moon 384,000 km.
The eccentricity of the Moon's orbit varies, from 0.026 to 0.077.
Both formulas show that the average eccentricity of the Moon's orbit is 0.0747.
And the average eccentricity of the moon's orbit, obtained using radar, is 0.054.
http://www.aggregateria.com/R/radiolokatsionnaja_astronomija.html
Also, the eccentricity of the Moon's orbit can be determined by the following formula. E = Vl / Vz = 27.3 / 365.2 = 0.0747
Where Vl is the Moon's orbital angular velocity.
Vz - Orbital angular velocity of the Earth.
By dividing the orbital speed of the Moon by the eccentricity of the Moon's orbit, the Earth's orbital speed can be calculated. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon
The statement that the Moon's orbit rotates and makes one revolution in 8.8 years does not correspond to reality, since the Solar Coriolis effect constantly stretches the Moon's orbit along the Earth's orbit.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal_precession
Based on the fact of the approach and removal of the moon from the sun, it is possible to construct. Reactionless drive.

The reason for the geological activity of the planets is also the Coriolis solar force.
The side of the Earth that is at dawn, due to the daily rotation of the Earth, approaches the Sun at a speed of 1600 km / h, and the side of the Earth that is at sunset moves away from the Sun at a speed of 1600 km / h. Due to this, the Coriolis solar force stretches the Earth along the Earth's orbit, and as a result, the geological activity of planets and satellites increases. (Spinning planets heat up, similar to a flat tire in a car.)
The high geological activity of Jupiter's moon Io can be explained by the fact that the axial and orbital velocity of Io is 15 times greater than that of the Moon.
Io's orbital speed is 17 km / s, and the Moon's orbital speed is 1 km / s. Io's axial velocity is 1 revolution per 42 hours, and the moon's axial velocity is 1 revolution per month.
The distance from Jupiter to Io, the surface temperature and diameter of Io are the same as those of the Moon.
Geologically active are also Earth, Jupiter, Ceres, Enceladus, etc.
The geological activity of Venus and Mercury, due to the slow rotation, is extremely low. https://images.app.goo.gl/EC2iXou7XDLBWMB66
If Io gets closer to Jupiter, then the axial and orbital velocity of Io will increase, due to which the Solar Coriolis force can tear Io into numerous pieces, which will then be located along Io's orbit, forming a ring.
Perhaps the Shoemaker Comet, Levi 9, was torn apart by the Solar Coriolis effect as it approached Jupiter at perihelion.
At the time of the comet's rupture, the distance from Jupiter to the comet reached about 40,000 km, and the orbital speed was 60 km / s. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Shoemaker%E2%80%93Levy_9
It is possible that the asteroid belt formed from a planet that, due to an increase in axial velocity, was torn apart by the Coriolis solar force.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt
The coefficient of geological activity of planets depends on the diameter, axial and orbital speed of the planets.
The video shows how the Coriolis solar force is pulling the Earth and the Moon's orbit along the Earth's orbit.

The Earth’s orbit is formed by the Galactic Coriolis force.
When the Earth, revolving around the Sun, approaches and moves away from the center of the galaxy at a speed of 30 km / s, the galactic Coriolis force stretches the Earth’s orbit along the orbit of the Sun, due to which the Earth’s orbit similar to the Lunar one should form. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_year https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
But the orbits of the planets are not stretched along the orbit of the Sun, which means that the Sun does not revolve around the center of the galaxy, but is in space, in a motionless state.
The reason for the formation of the ellipse of the planets and the reason for the rotation of the orbits of the planets is in the problem of two bodies, which has not yet been solved, like the problem of three bodies.
The statement that the ellipse of the planets is formed due to the disturbance of the planets does not stand up to criticism, since Venus and Neptune move in a circular orbit. https://m.habr.com/en/post/411567/
The objects of the solar system cannot endlessly revolve around numerous centers.
The laws of celestial mechanics are not omnipotent and are limited by the task of three bodies. The Earth revolves around the Sun, the Moon revolves around the Earth, and nothing revolves around the Moon. No natural planetary satellite has a permanent or temporary satellite, because this will be the task of four bodies, which contradicts the laws of being.
In nature, there is no relationship without symbiosis, and in the center of the galaxy, the solar system does not need.
https://spaceworlds.ru/solnechnaya-sistema/orbity-planet.html
And the main question is why planetary satellites do not have satellites, and asteroids possess satellites. Despite the fact that asteroids are much smaller than planet satellites. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor-planet_moon
The two satellites of Saturn, Janus and Epimetheus, move in the same orbit, and overtake each other every four years.
If these two satellites revolved around the Sun, then Janus would capture Epimetheus. https://elementy.ru/kartinka_dnya/430/Tanets_Yanusa_i_Epimeteya

Based on the foregoing, we can put forward the hypothesis of the formation of the solar system.
1. The solar system is an autonomous object of the Universe and does not revolve around the center of the "galaxy" but is in space, in a stationary state.
2. Sunlight, due to the deflecting force of the Coriolis, revolves around the solar system.
3. At the edge of the solar system, sunlight rotates against the rotation of the sun, at a speed of about 0 km / s, relative to the universe. https://images.app.goo.gl/GZMt3h1e1dH86wWN6
4. The radius of the solar system depends on the speed of light and the angular velocity of rotation of the sun. R ≈ c / ω
The speed of light ≈ 1,000,000,000 km / h.
The angular velocity of the Sun ≈ 0.0105 rad / h.
The radius of the solar system is ≈ 95,000,000,000 km.
http://universetoday-rus.com/blog/2008-07-16-10
5. I believe the stars are huge luminous balls that formed from sunlight.
6. Sunlight transforms into nebulae, stars, globular clusters, galaxies, Kuiper belt, asteroids, protoplanets, planets, which after billions of years, spinning, fall back onto the Sun. There is a cycle of solar matter in nature. Otherwise, for billions of years of its existence, the Sun has long been burned.
7. Outside the solar system, sunlight does not penetrate and it will be impossible to see the solar system from the side of the universe.
8. A planet is an object in the Solar System that has an atmosphere, daily rotation, etc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet
9. All mechanical processes that occur in the atmosphere also occur in the starry sky.
10. The hypothesis that the Moon was formed from the rings of the Earth, and Mercury is a former satellite of Venus, is within the laws of celestial mechanics.
11. In the solar system, everything is programmed and everything moves according to the strict laws of celestial mechanics, due to which randomness and chaos are not possible in the solar system.
12. The theory of the evolution of the Universe should not contradict and go beyond the laws of celestial mechanics. http://www.ponjatija.ru/node/938

Everything is relative!!!
The mechanism of rotation of cyclones, anticyclones, cycles and galaxies is one and the same. This can be verified by comparing these two pictures.
https://images.app.goo.gl/1QaUggrb6N1qQ3xF8 https://images.app.goo.gl/xozpZJsAfkq1owoX9
The galaxy is a single slowly rotating "monolith", which does not obey the law of gravity, because all stars in galaxies rotate with the same angular velocities (like a gas tank cover).
And in the solar system - the farther from the sun the planet is, the lower the orbital speed of the planet. While Neptune makes one revolution around the Sun, Mercury makes more than 500 revolutions.
The orbital speed of Mercury is 50 km / s, and Neptune is 5 km / s. https://life.ru/p/907112
Based on the foregoing, we can conclude that in the center of the galaxy is the eye of the storm, and not a black hole and dark matter. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_(cyclone) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve
Black holes leave their galaxies. https://news.rambler.ru/scitech/43938566-astronomy-pokazali-kak-chernye-dyry-pokidayut-svoi-galaktiki/

Astronomers accidentally discovered a strange star escaping from the Milky Way.
https://in-space.ru/astronomy-sluchajno-obnaruzhili-strannuyu-zvezdu-ubegayushhuyu-iz-mlechnogo-puti/

The black hole spawned a unique kind of planet. https://m.lenta.ru/news/2020/04/27/hole/amp/
Own movement of stars. https://spacegid.com/zvezda-barnarda.html
Regeneration of cyclones. https://slide-share.ru/regeneraciya-anticiklonov-28872

There are no answers to the following questions:
1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
a) And the stars, rotating around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.
b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular form of the galaxy?
c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars should rotate around the core of the galaxy in only one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.
2. The statement that globular star clusters are satellites of galaxies and rotate in very elongated orbits at a speed of ≈ 200 km / s also goes beyond celestial mechanics. https://images.app.goo.gl/7HbHogMoCKWPswX18
a) If only globular star clusters revolved around the galaxy, then globular star clusters would have a disk shape. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy
b) Will Saturn and its satellites be able to rotate around the Sun, in the form of a globular cluster?
3. In globular star clusters, there is no orbital rotation of stars.
a) Then what forces form a globular cluster of stars?
4. If globular star clusters are satellites of galaxies, then star clusters should have, rotation axis, libration, etc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster

Continuation: "The mechanism of thermoregulation of the Earth."
Forum on the flagship. https://vmf.net.ru/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2328&sid=a49d602d08c50eda4f043b73838e5f8a
Forum of Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky.
http://forum.unn.ru/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=10331&sid=cfbc49e0cf32263eff20888ca205ab15
The opening was published in the Russian-German peer-reviewed journal “Eastern European Scientific Journal” No. 3/2015. Page 64. June
Scientific journal NBIKS-Nauka.Tehnologii No. 4/2018. Page 104. (Nanotechnological Society of Russia).
French Maritime Forum. http://forummarine.forumactif.com/t9357-le-flux-et-reflux-est-le-resultat-de-la-rotation-de-la-terre
English forum. "Weather / Earth Sciences" https://www.wxforum.net/index.php?topic=35094.0

[Kryptid]

They are on inclined orbits, much as Pluto is.

[hamdani yusuf]

Why do the stars that are above the poles of the galaxy and do not rotate in the orbit of the galaxy, do not fall on the core of the galaxy.

They did fall already, thus we can't see them anymore. Some stars that missed the galactic core when falling would orbit in inclined angle.

[evan_au]

For the same reason that satellites orbiting the Earth in polar orbits don't crash into the Earth:
- Providing they keep traveling at orbital velocity, the satellites won't crash into the Earth
- And stars orbiting the center of the galaxy, won't crash into the supermassive black hole.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_orbit#Earth_orbits

The Max Planck Institute has been studying several bright stars orbiting the central supermassive black hole for almost 20 years now.
- This is long enough to observe large segments of their orbit.
- It is an ellipse, as predicted by Kepler and Newton
- Some teams are now trying to observe some of the time dilation effects predicted by Einstein's General Relativity
- But to the naked eye, the orbits still look like ellipses.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*#Orbiting_stars

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

They are on inclined orbits, much as Pluto is.

If the inclination of the star’s orbit will be 90 degrees, then the orbits of the stars will intersect. And the number of stars in the galaxy is tens of trillions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

[Halc]

If the inclination of the star’s orbit will be 90 degrees, then the orbits of the stars will intersect.

They don't need to be inclined at any particular angle for their paths to intersect.  Yes, plenty of objects, including our own sun, follow paths over places that cross the paths of other stars.  To collide, both stars need to be there at the same time.

This again is why we have multiple satellites in polar orbits and yet they don't collide.

[Kryptid]

If the inclination of the star’s orbit will be 90 degrees, then the orbits of the stars will intersect. And the number of stars in the galaxy is tens of trillions.

You're underestimating the sheer distances between the stars.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

If the inclination of the star’s orbit will be 90 degrees, then the orbits of the stars will intersect. And the number of stars in the galaxy is tens of trillions.

You're underestimating the sheer distances between the stars.

The distance does not matter.

[Halc]

The distance does not matter.

Two people blindfolded and running around a closet are far more likely to collide than the same two people doing that activity in Australia.  Yes, distance makes all the difference.

[Kryptid]

The distance does not matter.

Explain your reasoning.

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~ryden/ast162_7/notes31.html

Near the galactic center, the average distance between neighboring stars would be only 1000 AU (about a light-week).

1,000 astronomical units is about 25 times further apart than Pluto is from the Sun. Please explain how stars at such a large separation will collide.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

There are no answers to the following questions:

1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy.
a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.
b) Can the planet hang motionless above the pole of the sun?
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html
2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
a) And the stars, rotating around the core of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.
b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular form of the galaxy?
c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, in only one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.
d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?
3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.
a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.
4. The claim that globular star clusters are satellites of galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.
a) In order for globular star clusters to rotate around the galaxy, the galaxy itself must rotate around the center, and not be in free flight. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster

[Kryptid]

There are no answers to the following questions:
1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
And around the core of the galaxy, stars rotate in several planes.
2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.
And around the north and south poles of the galaxy, stars revolve.
3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.
And above the poles of the galaxy, there are stars and do not fall.
4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

1-3 are not questions, they are statements (mostly incorrect ones, at that).

1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.

No they don't. Each one has its orbit tilted relative to the Sun's equator at least a bit. If you include minor bodies like Pluto and comets, the degree of tilt is far more extreme. As a matter of fact, the trans-Neptunian objects 2014 LM₂₈ and 2008 KV₄₂ have orbital inclinations of 84.7 and 103.4 degrees, respectively. Neither has fallen onto the Sun, despite being in practically polar orbits.

Generally speaking, the planets are close to the same plane because they all formed from the same original gas cloud.

2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.

2014 LM₂₈ and 2008 KV₄₂ disagree with you.

3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.

2014 LM₂₈ and 2008 KV₄₂ disagree with you.

4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.

Due to the distances involved, you'd expect that to happen very, very rarely.

[hamdani yusuf]

And above the poles of the galaxy, there are stars and do not fall.

Do you think they just float above the poles of the galaxy, defying gravitational force?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Are the stars hanging motionless over the poles of the galaxy.

Do you think they just float above the poles of the galaxy, defying gravitational force?

This question is for proponents of the existence of galaxies.

[Dave Lev]

Dear Yusup

It seems that you are not fully satisfied from the answers that you have got and therefore you ask the same questions again.

There are no answers to the following questions:
1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
And around the core of the galaxy, stars rotate in several planes.
2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.
And around the north and south poles of the galaxy, stars revolve.
3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.
And above the poles of the galaxy, there are stars and do not fall.
4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html

I do understand your key points..
So, let me help you to highlight some of your key ideas.
In order to do so, we first need to understand what do we really see in our galaxy:
1. Accretion disc - all the matter in the accretion disc orbits around the SMBH in the same direction and at the galactic disc.
2. The central bulge - From the accretion disc till 1KPC. In that aria we see that stars orbit in all directions above and below the SMBH.
3. Bar - From 1Kpc till 3KPC - The bar is located between the bulge to the Galactic ring. At the bar we suddenly see some order in the orbital movement.
4. Galactic ring at 3Kpc - All the stars in the galactic ring orbit in one direction while the ring itself is located at the galactic ring. However the estimated thickness of the ring is about 3,000 LY
5. Galactic spiral arm - Starting from the ring at 3KPC to about 12KPC - 15 KPC. In that aria all the stars are located at the galactic disc and orbit at one direction. However, as we get further away from the ring, the thickness is going down. Therefore, at the ring the thickness is 3,000 LY. At our location (8KPC) the thickness is 1,000 Ly. While at the far end of the spiral arms the thickness is about 400 Ly.
So, how could it be that as we go further away, the thickness of the galactic disc is going down?
One of the key element to explain your question is - "orbital inclinations"
 

Each one has its orbit tilted relative to the Sun's equator at least a bit. If you include minor bodies like Pluto and comets, the degree of tilt is far more extreme. As a matter of fact, the trans-Neptunian objects 2014 LM28 and 2008 KV42 have orbital inclinations of 84.7 and 103.4 degrees, respectively. Neither has fallen onto the Sun, despite being in practically polar orbits.

However, as we go further away from the center, the orbital inclinations should have more severe impact.
For example - a planet with radius R and orbital inclination of x will shift it to maximal h above/below the orbital disc during the orbital cycle. While a similar planet with the same orbital inclination, but at radius 2R, will shift to maximal 2h.
Therefore, as we go further away the impact of the orbital inclination should be more severe.
Hence, how could it be that at the galactic spiral arms, as we go further away, the thickness is going down?
6. Outwards the spiral arms - Suddenly outwards the spiral arms the stars start to move again at any direction above and below the galactic disc.
How dark matter or any other idea can explain all of that complex structure of the spiral galaxy and different orbital behavior at each segment of the galaxy?

Your key question is:
"Why do stars above the poles of the galaxy not fall on the core of the galaxy"
Do you mean when it falls into the SMBH mouth?
Our scientists claim that SMBH eats the stars from the central bulge. In this case, how could it be that the SMBH sets them first at the galactic disc before it eats its dinner? In other words, why each falling star does not set an accretion disc which is based on its current orbital inclination?

I hope that I help you with your questions

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.
Is there a round solar system.

Who can give a link to a description of the mechanism of orbital rotation of tens of a billion stars in round galaxies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster

[Kryptid]

This question is for proponents of the existence of galaxies.

You're denying the existence of galaxies? Seriously?

[Bored chemist]

There are no answers to the following questions:

1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?
a) This is called levitation, and contradicts elementary logic.
b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html
2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
a) And the stars, revolving around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.
b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.
c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, only in one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.
d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?
3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.
a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.
4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.
a) For globular star clusters to rotate around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy itself must rotate around the center, and not be in free flight. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster

Insanity Is Doing the Same Thing Over and Over Again and Expecting Different Results.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

This question is for proponents of the existence of galaxies.

You're denying the existence of galaxies? Seriously?

I do not just deny, I prove, based on facts.

[Kryptid]

I do not just deny, I prove, based on facts.

Are you saying that galaxies don't exist? Do you think this is some kind of computer-generated image? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda_Galaxy#/media/File:Andromeda_Galaxy_(with_h-alpha).jpg