0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: talanum1 on 30/04/2020 18:51:54Photons only exist at C. They don't need a "protophoton".What is the mechanism for photon production then?Quote from: talanum1 on 30/04/2020 18:51:54And, when your idea predicts something silly like a continuously increasing speed of light, it's time to ditch it.It does not predict an increasing speed of light anymore, I changed it.There is errors in the figure: for the electron the filled circle on T_2 must be deleted and two open circles must be added to S_4. For the positron the open circle on T_2 must be deleted and two filled circles must be added to S_4.
Photons only exist at C. They don't need a "protophoton".
And, when your idea predicts something silly like a continuously increasing speed of light, it's time to ditch it.
What is the mechanism for photon transmission then?
What part of it does not make sense?
Is there anyone reading this who knows what any part of tantalum1's diagram means?
It doesn't make sense if it does not specify a known property or if it is inconsistent with a formula. Please specify what it is inconsistent with.
If space paths are helixes then speed through it determines angular momentum. Therefore the size of the magnetic moment of an electron would be proportional to speed. Is this the case?
Quote from: talanum1 on 01/05/2020 12:37:22What part of it does not make sense? Is there anyone reading this who knows what any part of tantalum1's diagram means?
It is an electromagnetic wave - a varying electric and magnetic field - which propagates at c in a vacuum. As such it has no rest mass and in accordance with Newtons laws will continue to propagate until something stops it.
inertia is required to keep moving at the same velocity.
This gives a reason why the speed of light is c m/s. It also gives a mechanism for the reduced speed of light in a medium: the resistive forces are larger.
The photon moves according to Newton's Laws.
The photon must copy itself onto the next spacetime event and destroy the previous copy. It must do so repeatedly.
Does an ocean wave move by copying and destroying?
Does this describe a sufficient mechanism for propagating an object?