The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?

  • 16 Replies
  • 961 Views
  • 7 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nudephil (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 249
  • Activity:
    5%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • Naked Scientists Producer
    • View Profile
Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« on: 08/07/2020 17:48:59 »
We've had this question in from Robert:

We heard experts talking about a significant number of COVID-19 cases being asymptomatic in New Zealand in March and April, including Dr Chris Smith on Radio NZ on 11 April (very informative). It seems strange that with 40 experts on the SAGE committee, no-one in the UK was aware of this aspect until much later. Can you clarify this please?

What do we think?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21898
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #1 on: 08/07/2020 18:12:19 »
The problem is that the UK elected the man who hid in the fridge.
He is, of course, a liar.
He's lying about what SAGE said.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11351
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 657 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #2 on: 08/07/2020 19:50:07 »
Who "no-one"? The first asymptomatic carrier in the UK was widely reported in the press in January but President Cummings decided his future was better protected by negligently killing 50,000 civilians and now pretending it is all someone else's fault.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    22%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #3 on: 08/07/2020 22:06:44 »
The BBC was actively denying asymyomatic spread well into march - I know that for a fact, I'm not sure how much later it was before they stopped lying about it. My guess was that they agreed a government embago. Whatever the government told the BBC to keep them quiet, my guess is that the real reason they wanted it kept quiet, was so that they could empty hospital beds of oldies and tip them into care homes.
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1592
  • Activity:
    57%
  • Thanked: 29 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #4 on: 08/07/2020 23:11:47 »
Come on Chris, whats the lowdown ?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11351
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 657 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #5 on: 09/07/2020 20:54:43 »
Apologies - sort of. The first diagnosed cases in the UK were Chinese nationals visiting York in January. The first Brit was diagnosed on 6 February, but by then he had asymptomatically infected a number of friends on a skiing holiday in Switzerland in late January. All these cases were fully reported at the time by BBC, ITV/Channel 4 and Global News - unless I'm psychic. Pity that politicians and senior government advisers are too far up themselves to listen to the radio or admit to having a TV licence. 
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21898
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #6 on: 09/07/2020 21:12:16 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/07/2020 20:54:43
All these cases were fully reported at the time by BBC, ITV/Channel 4 and Global News - unless I'm psychic.
They were reported, which rather undermines this:
Quote from: set fair on 08/07/2020 22:06:44
The BBC was actively denying asymyomatic spread well into march - I know that for a fact,
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    22%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #7 on: 09/07/2020 22:14:38 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/07/2020 21:12:16
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/07/2020 20:54:43
All these cases were fully reported at the time by BBC, ITV/Channel 4 and Global News - unless I'm psychic.
They were reported, which rather undermines this:
Quote from: set fair on 08/07/2020 22:06:44
The BBC was actively denying asymyomatic spread well into march - I know that for a fact,


You might well think so, but both are true. Having reported the case of the well travelled man and of a Chinese child before that, the BBC adopted a position of denying asymptomatic spread.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11351
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 657 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #8 on: 09/07/2020 22:58:40 »
Please supply a reference to a BBC transmission (other than a phone-in or interview with an idiot posing as a politician) that denied asymptomatic infectivity.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21898
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #9 on: 09/07/2020 23:11:33 »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51800707
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000h0vn
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-52015486



Quote from: set fair on 09/07/2020 22:14:38
Having reported the case of the well travelled man and of a Chinese child before that, the BBC adopted a position of denying asymptomatic spread.
I'd be interested to see your evidence.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5263
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 434 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #10 on: 10/07/2020 06:42:04 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/07/2020 23:11:33
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51800707
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000h0vn
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-52015486



Quote from: set fair on 09/07/2020 22:14:38
Having reported the case of the well travelled man and of a Chinese child before that, the BBC adopted a position of denying asymptomatic spread.
I'd be interested to see your evidence.

They were reporting asymptotic transmission back in January
Back then information was only just emerging from data in China and it was thought that main asymptotic transmission was before symptoms developed, insufficient numbers or tests to show that some carriers remained asymptotic throughout their infection.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 273 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #11 on: 10/07/2020 10:27:00 »
Quote from: set fair on 08/07/2020 22:06:44
The BBC was actively denying asymyomatic spread well into march - I know that for a fact, I'm not sure how much later it was before they stopped lying about it. My guess was that they agreed a government embago. Whatever the government told the BBC to keep them quiet, my guess is that the real reason they wanted it kept quiet, was so that they could empty hospital beds of oldies and tip them into care homes.

This is rubbish. I was on national radio and TV most days (much to many people's chagrin ;)) and we just reported the facts as they were known or were emerging. No one told me what I could and could not say.

While we suspected that some people were asymptomatic or trivially infected with the virus, no one in the world had any idea what the true number was because how would we measure something invisible?

In fact, we published a paper from Addenbrooke's Hospital screening staff and found that 5% of healthcare workers were infected and at work - https://elifesciences.org/articles/58728; prior to this we had very limited data.

Now we have more information and cases to look at, and people have done further studies, we know that a significant proportion of those infected have very few symptoms yet can be infectious. But no one ever denied asymptomatic spread and certainly not in some sort of conspiratorial way.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11351
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 657 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #12 on: 10/07/2020 10:32:57 »
You are too modest, Chris. I recall one broadcast tour de force in which you not only discussed asymptomatic infectivity but also managed to answer questions about the President of the USA without saying "dangerous idiot". The Foreign Office has vacancies for such polished diplomats.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    22%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #13 on: 10/07/2020 23:39:19 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/07/2020 22:58:40
Please supply a reference to a BBC transmission (other than a phone-in or interview with an idiot posing as a politician) that denied asymptomatic infectivity.

Any answers 7th March
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21898
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #14 on: 10/07/2020 23:57:06 »
Quote from: set fair on 10/07/2020 23:39:19
Any answers 7th March
Would you like to expand on that?
A time, perhaps?

A couple of days later the news was clear. Asymptomatic transmission is a thing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51800707
« Last Edit: 11/07/2020 00:04:16 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11351
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 657 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #15 on: 11/07/2020 00:35:54 »
Quote from: set fair on 10/07/2020 23:39:19
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/07/2020 22:58:40
Please supply a reference to a BBC transmission (other than a phone-in or interview with an idiot posing as a politician) that denied asymptomatic infectivity.

Any answers 7th March
Since when has "Any Answers" been a mouthpiece for BBC policy? It's a live phone-in with a moderator trying to keep a balance between ranting conspiracy theorists and apologists for Her Majesty's Incompetent Government. The only policy  directive seems to be "Remember this is Radio 4, dear."
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5263
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 434 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why was the UK late to discussing asymptomatic cases?
« Reply #16 on: 11/07/2020 08:35:45 »
Quote from: set fair on 10/07/2020 23:39:19
Any answers 7th March
That is a ridiculous response to your claim:
Quote from: set fair on 08/07/2020 22:06:44
The BBC was actively denying asymyomatic spread well into march - I know that for a fact, I'm not sure how much later it was before they stopped lying about it.
As Alan says, that programme is a phone in where anyone can express an opinion. You have shown no evidence of ‘actively denying’ whereas we have shown they were actively reporting asymptomatic spread since January.
Please stop spreading false news.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: asymptomatic  / uk  / new zealand  / sage  / covid  / no symptoms  / infection 
 

Similar topics (5)

Do Cats see in color, and if so are there any reported cases of color blindness?

Started by Karen W.Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 5
Views: 5464
Last post 23/11/2007 15:08:24
by Karen W.
Are cold temperatures desirable in cases of lung inflammation?

Started by PetrochemicalsBoard COVID-19

Replies: 1
Views: 1452
Last post 21/03/2020 19:55:46
by Petrochemicals
How many days is infectious virus excreted by Covid-19 cases (not just PCR +ve)?

Started by DrmarkfBoard COVID-19

Replies: 3
Views: 569
Last post 18/04/2020 11:06:19
by chris
How accurate are the records across countries of cases and deaths from Covid-19?

Started by N5GoonerBoard COVID-19

Replies: 13
Views: 612
Last post 23/10/2020 10:37:07
by alancalverd
Are there any cases where the atoms do the moving in gas to conduct electricity?

Started by Paul Anderson Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 10
Views: 5579
Last post 25/01/2009 20:15:47
by Vern
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.17 seconds with 78 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.