[Bored chemist]

Trump is words,

Given that, until very recently, Trump was president, can you think of a reason why the allegations may not yet have been proven?

[Bored chemist]

During the speech he said, "let's walk peacefully to  the Capitol"

What else did he say?
"They rigged it like they’ve never rigged an election before. By the way, last night, they didn’t do a bad job either,"
"ll of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical left Democrats, which is what they’re doing and stolen by the fake news media. That’s what they’ve done and what they’re doing. We will never give up. We will never concede, it doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved."

"We will not take it any more and that’s what this is all about. To use a favourite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the steal."
"I won them both and the second one, I won much bigger than the first."

"Crowd: Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump!

Thank you. "

"Great. You’re doing a great job, but I’d love it if they could be allowed to come up here with us. Is that possible? Can you just let them come up, please? Rudy, you did a great job. He’s got guts. You know what? He’s got guts, unlike a lot of people in the Republican party. He’s got guts, he fights. He fights,"
And
"We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong."

All in all he uses the word "fight" 23 times in that speech.

[Bored chemist]

Biden's position is worse then Trumps,

Then is not the same word as than.
Please learn the difference.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

way

Trump is words,

Given that, until very recently, Trump was president, can you think of a reason why the allegations may not yet have been proven?

Irrelevant, convictions are convictions and allegations allegations.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

Biden's position is worse then Trumps,

Then is not the same word as than.
Please learn the difference.

How about you stop nitpicking as part of your trolling

[Jolly2 (OP)]

This is Britian actively persecuting a journalist.

Yes it is.
And they were doing it long before Biden was elected so it's not because Biden is president, is it?
It's irrelevant.

Wasnt relating Britians behaviour to Biden even if Biden dropped the charges against Assange its clear Britain won't let him out of prison.

I was merely pointing out that Biden is more aggressive in seeking an appeal against the Verdict to refuse to extradite Assange. It was in the end the Obama Biden administration that caused Assange to seek refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in the first place, Obama prosecuted more whistle blowers then all previous administrations combined, Biden will.just carry on as before, Biden is a disgrace.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

¼

What criminal convictions?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-associates-prison-faced-criminal-charges/story?id=68358219
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-bannon-associates-factbox-idUSKBN25G1YU

Yes convictions. Not allegations

Yes convidtions e.g.
Manafort was found guilty

And the point of changing the conversation from Trump to Manafort serves what purpose? Other then you muddling the conversational waters?

[Jolly2 (OP)]

During the speech he said, "let's walk peacefully to  the Capitol"

What else did he say?
"They rigged it like they’ve never rigged an election before. By the way, last night, they didn’t do a bad job either,"
"ll of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical left Democrats, which is what they’re doing and stolen by the fake news media. That’s what they’ve done and what they’re doing. We will never give up. We will never concede, it doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved."

"We will not take it any more and that’s what this is all about. To use a favourite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the steal."
"I won them both and the second one, I won much bigger than the first."

"Crowd: Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump!

Thank you. "

"Great. You’re doing a great job, but I’d love it if they could be allowed to come up here with us. Is that possible? Can you just let them come up, please? Rudy, you did a great job. He’s got guts. You know what? He’s got guts, unlike a lot of people in the Republican party. He’s got guts, he fights. He fights,"
And
"We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong."

All in all he uses the word "fight" 23 times in that speech.

You really are a toady. When did you finally decide to get on your knees for the swamp thing exactly?

[Bored chemist]

¼

What criminal convictions?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-associates-prison-faced-criminal-charges/story?id=68358219
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-bannon-associates-factbox-idUSKBN25G1YU

Yes convictions. Not allegations

Yes convidtions e.g.
Manafort was found guilty

And the point of changing the conversation from Trump to Manafort serves what purpose? Other then you muddling the conversational waters?

As previously discussed, it shows that he's the swamp.
Had you forgotten?

Quote from: Jolly2 on Yesterday at 18:01:24
He is also filling up his entire administration with people from the corporate sector just like Obama did, and his picks are horrible.
What fraction of them have criminal convictions and how does this compare to Trump?
How many of them are his family and how does this compare to Trump.

[Bored chemist]

When did you finally decide to get on your knees for the swamp thing exactly?

I'm certainly not on my knees for Trump, so this  post of yours (like so many) makes no sense.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

¼

What criminal convictions?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-associates-prison-faced-criminal-charges/story?id=68358219
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-bannon-associates-factbox-idUSKBN25G1YU

Yes convictions. Not allegations

Yes convidtions e.g.
Manafort was found guilty

And the point of changing the conversation from Trump to Manafort serves what purpose? Other then you muddling the conversational waters?

As previously discussed, it shows that he's the swamp.
Had you forgotten?

Quote from: Jolly2 on Yesterday at 18:01:24
He is also filling up his entire administration with people from the corporate sector just like Obama did, and his picks are horrible.
What fraction of them have criminal convictions and how does this compare to Trump?
How many of them are his family and how does this compare to Trump.

Right someone else being convicted of lying, proves Trump is the swamp. Even tho all the swampy establishment groups like the NSA CIA FBI Pentagon,  democratic and Republican parties all hate him. Yeah cut and dry.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

When did you finally decide to get on your knees for the swamp thing exactly?

I'm certainly not on my knees for Trump, so this  post of yours (like so many) makes no sense.

No your on your knees for the Time magazine Cabal. That cabal is the swamp and they all just like the security services hate Trump. Just like you do.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

During the speech he said, "let's walk peacefully to  the Capitol"

What else did he say?...
"Great. You’re doing a great job, but I’d love it if they could be allowed to come up here with us. Is that possible? Can you just let them come up, please? Rudy, you did a great job. He’s got guts. You know what? He’s got guts, unlike a lot of people in the Republican party. He’s got guts, he fights. He fights,"
And
"We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong."

All in all he uses the word "fight" 23 times in that speech.

Wow,  here are some Democrats

[Bored chemist]

Wow,  here are some Democrats

Show me the one who used the word "fight" 23 times in one speech.

[Bored chemist]

No your on your knees for the Time magazine Cabal.

No.
But it's good  to see that you are working on your spelling.
Now you have got the hang of "cabal", try to find out the difference between "your" and "you're".

[Jolly2 (OP)]

Wow,  here are some Democrats

Show me the one who used the word "fight" 23 times in one speech.

No your on your knees for the Time magazine Cabal.

No.
But it's good  to see that you are working on your spelling.
Now you have got the hang of "cabal", try to find out the difference between "your" and "you're".

Well amazing job, has nothing to do.with the topic at hand. You're a Troll

[Bored chemist]

So, you don't think Trump telling his followers to fight  to overturn the lection result is relevant to the fact that he's facing a charge of insurrection.

Others may hold a different view.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

So, you don't think Trump telling his followers to fight  to overturn the lection result is relevant to the fact that he's facing a charge of insurrection.

Others may hold a different view.

The impeachment hearing has nothing to do with incitement to riot, they are seeking to prevent Trump running for office again. Its entirely a political trial.  The Democrats spent most of 2020 inciting people to riot.

Kamala Harris on the riots happening across the country in 2020 "they are not going to stop and they should not stop"

You'll have to suck it up.

Trump just got acquitted.

TRUMP 2024🥳

All adding up

[Bored chemist]

Well, this is funny.
https://www.businessinsider.com/proud-boys-group-splinters-after-enrique-tarrio-outed-fbi-2021-2?r=US&IR=T&fbclid=IwAR1jlixBJyReteaPSlbJ47ZGOd4cOndHAhTdmKfPP4OXfh8nl7HDEvSJJCY

Kamala Harris on the riots happening across the country in 2020 "they are not going to stop and they should not stop"

There doesn't seem to be any evidence that she said that.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

Well, this is funny.
https://www.businessinsider.com/proud-boys-group-splinters-after-enrique-tarrio-outed-fbi-2021-2?r=US&IR=T&fbclid=IwAR1jlixBJyReteaPSlbJ47ZGOd4cOndHAhTdmKfPP4OXfh8nl7HDEvSJJCY

Kamala Harris on the riots happening across the country in 2020 "they are not going to stop and they should not stop"

There doesn't seem to be any evidence that she said that.

Yep clearly did your homework 5:30 on.
"They are not going to stop they are not going to let up and they should not"

https://nationalfile.com/kamala-is-a-pathological-liar-struggling-to-score-diversity-points/

"Recently, Kamala was caught in an obvious lie. She claimed that she demanded “Fweedom” when she was a child attending a civil rights protest. Harris plagiarized the anecdote from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Did Harris really think she could get away with cribbing a tale from Dr. King, considering King’s massive disproportionate influence on modern public school curricula? Every millenial in the media grew up studying King in school and having all-day seminars on MLK Day. Harris would have had a better chance of getting away with her lie if she’d said she chopped down her father’s cherry tree."