[Bored chemist]

added by an algorithm

Do you understand that what you said there means nothing?

[Bored chemist]

he stopped the CIA funding ISIS

Which they weren't doing.
ISIS is about the only group they weren't funding.

[alancalverd]

She checked the roles and found that her dog had actually voted in the last election.  That was her claim anyway.

Now why did she take it into her head to check whether her dog had been enrolled?
Since the electoral roll is compiled by householders responding to a postal enquiry, only she (or the dog) could have enrolled him - nobody else would have known the dog's name and entered it on the form that she signed as householder.
And why did she complain? Did Buster tell her he had voted Democrat in spite of her instructions? By turning up and putting a cross on the paper? Or did he fill in the postal ballot that was delivered to his address, sign it, and mail it? That's one hell of a valuable dog!

Is she admitting to repetitive electoral fraud, or do I detect a whiff of bullshit?

[Jolly2 (OP)]

She checked the roles and found that her dog had actually voted in the last election.  That was her claim anyway.

Now why did she take it into her head to check whether her dog had been enrolled?
Since the electoral roll is compiled by householders responding to a postal enquiry, only she (or the dog) could have enrolled him - nobody else would have known the dog's name and entered it on the form that she signed as householder.

Now theres an assumption,  anyone with access to the registration database,  could do so. The suggestion an owner would seek to register thier dog is rather hilarious, and unlikely as the chances of being caught you would assume to be quiet high. but an interested party seeking to find extra fake voters in thier rush not noticing the registration was actually for a dog and making a fake registered voter anyway,  makes more sense.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

he stopped the CIA funding ISIS

Which they weren't doing.
ISIS is about the only group they weren't funding.

News report on America funding ISIS

Most terrorists work for a government, terrorism is a government tactic.

America funded Osama bin laden, to terrorise  Russia in Afghanistan,  they funded terrorist  groups across south America, the rebels  in Chechnya, and ISIS to attack Syria. The same play book again and again.

......

On another note war monger Biden attacked Syria today

[Bored chemist]

She checked the roles and found that her dog had actually voted in the last election.  That was her claim anyway.

Now why did she take it into her head to check whether her dog had been enrolled?
Since the electoral roll is compiled by householders responding to a postal enquiry, only she (or the dog) could have enrolled him - nobody else would have known the dog's name and entered it on the form that she signed as householder.

Now theres an assumption,  anyone with access to the registration database,  could do so. The suggestion an owner would seek to register thier dog is rather hilarious, and unlikely as the chances of being caught you would assume to be quiet high. but an interested party seeking to find extra fake voters in thier rush not noticing the registration was actually for a dog and making a fake registered voter anyway,  makes more sense.

It's still pointless.
I register your dog. (It's not clear how)
The "spare" ballot paper is delivered to your house.

But I still can't use it.

The suggestion an owner would seek to register thier dog is rather hilarious

Yes, funny, but plausible.
https://angry-chef.com/blog/my-nutritionist-licks-his-own-butt

[alancalverd]

If you have access to the registration database, you don't register dogs at addresses you don't control, but Smiths Browns and Joneses at addresses where you can pick up their ballot papers. Ask any Republican.

[Kryptid]

This appears to be what Jolly was referring to: https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/11/12/dog-vote-santa-cruz-county-voter-fraud/

Pellerin told KSBW Monterey the claim was investigated and there was no record that corroborates it.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

This appears to be what Jolly was referring to: https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/11/12/dog-vote-santa-cruz-county-voter-fraud/

Pellerin told KSBW Monterey the claim was investigated and there was no record that corroborates it.

Yeah I watched this.

"The claim about a dog voting in the county was made in viral video that showed a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote. As of Wednesday evening, the video had tens of thousands of views."

Aa I said "that was her claim"

Surely the actual women should be questioned.

[Kryptid]

Aa I said "that was her claim"

And now we know that there isn't evidence to back her claim up.

[alancalverd]

"a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote.

So did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form? Either way, he should be in a circus, or maybe the space program.

My grandmother used to cover the kitchen floor with newspaper whenever we left the dog in the house. One day she ran back and turned all the pages over. I asked why and she said "He can't read but he likes to look at the pictures."

[Jolly2 (OP)]

Aa I said "that was her claim"

And now we know that there isn't evidence to back her claim up.

No sadly all you know is one media source says it isn't, that doesnt mean it isn't.  All relative to who is speaking.

[Kryptid]

No sadly all you know is one media source says it isn't, that doesnt mean it isn't.

Okay, so do you have any good evidence that the event in question actually happened? Unsupported claims are very poor evidence.

But if you want another source pointing to the claim being baseless, here's this: https://www.nbc12.com/2020/11/12/calif-county-disputes-womans-claim-her-service-dog-voted-election/

[Jolly2 (OP)]

No sadly all you know is one media source says it isn't, that doesnt mean it isn't.

Okay, so do you have any good evidence that the event in question actually happened? Unsupported claims are very poor evidence.

But if you want another source pointing to the claim being baseless, here's this: https://www.nbc12.com/2020/11/12/calif-county-disputes-womans-claim-her-service-dog-voted-election/

The claim it hasnt happeed is all based on the Dogs name not being a registered voter.

The women in the video claimed she had checked and that the Dogs vote had gone through. Sadly the traditional media are all untrustworthy. I'd like a more independent investigation.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

"a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote.

So did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form? Either way, he should be in a circus, or maybe the space program.

My grandmother used to cover the kitchen floor with newspaper whenever we left the dog in the house. One day she ran back and turned all the pages over. I asked why and she said "He can't read but he likes to look at the pictures."

Probably a good use for the papers

Max Blumenthal reports on how Britian is running a covert propaganda operation, MI6 has over 15,000 journalists employed to lie to readers. Both the BBC and Reuters are involved along with many other media outlets.  They have atleast 400 journalists active inside Russia that were trained by Mi6 in London .
To quote Max "everything they are acusing Russia of doing, they(Britian) are doing times 10 over"

Looks like YouTube or someone has blocked the video, you can still find the report by Max Blumenthal on his site.

https://orinocotribune.com/reuters-bbc-and-bellingcat-participated-in-covert-uk-foreign-office-funded-programs-to-weaken-russia-leaked-docs-reveal/

"In several proposals to the British Foreign Office, Reuters boasted of a global influence network of 15,000 journalists and staff, including 400 inside Russia."

In 2019, the FCO put forward a similar initiative, this time articulating a more aggressive plan to “counter the Russian government’s narrative and domination of the media and information space.” In effect, the British government was seeking to infiltrate Russian media and propagate its own narrative through an influence network of Russian journalists trained in the UK.

In its first bid, the media giant boasted of establishing a global network of 15,000 journalists and bloggers through “capacity building interventions.” In Russia, it claimed at least 400 journalists had been cultivated through its training programs.

[Kryptid]

The claim it hasnt happeed is all based on the Dogs name not being a registered voter.

The women in the video claimed she had checked and that the Dogs vote had gone through. Sadly the traditional media are all untrustworthy. I'd like a more independent investigation.

The woman is the claimant. The burden of proof is on the claimant to show that their claim is right, not on the detractors to show that it's wrong.

[Bored chemist]

MI6 has over 15,000 journalists employed

In reality, MI6 has 2,594 employees.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

MI6 has over 15,000 journalists employed

In reality, MI6 has 2,594 employees.

15,000 associates, just semantics. Doesnt change the reality that Mi6 is a propaganda organisation. And a disgusting producer of fake news.

And all the while the British state is torturing a journalist for telling the truth.  Britain is a tyrannical joke and has no moral legs to stand on.

Time for the world to BOYCOTT Britain to free Assange. The type of evil the British establishment and the cults that run it are engaged in demands a responce from humanity. Time everyone turns their back on them,  and Brits that care about their lives and family should leave, living in big brother tyranny isnt an acceptable state of affairs for a human being.

[Jolly2 (OP)]

The claim it hasnt happeed is all based on the Dogs name not being a registered voter.

The women in the video claimed she had checked and that the Dogs vote had gone through. Sadly the traditional media are all untrustworthy. I'd like a more independent investigation.

The woman is the claimant. The burden of proof is on the claimant to show that their claim is right, not on the detractors to show that it's wrong.

They should just check the name she checked.

[alancalverd]

I repeat:  did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form?