0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
They should just check the name she checked.
Santa Cruz County Clerk Gail Pellerin looked into the claims and says no one was registered in the county by the name of Maggie Magoo Vela.
I repeat: did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form?
Quote from: Jolly2 on 28/02/2021 12:01:14They should just check the name she checked.They did: QuoteSanta Cruz County Clerk Gail Pellerin looked into the claims and says no one was registered in the county by the name of Maggie Magoo Vela.
We don't know, the women who made the claim said she checked and her dog had voted.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 28/02/2021 17:41:36We don't know, the women who made the claim said she checked and her dog had voted. And Trump said he would build a wall and the Mexicans would pay.Are you aware that some people tell lies?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/02/2021 17:46:04Quote from: Jolly2 on 28/02/2021 17:41:36We don't know, the women who made the claim said she checked and her dog had voted. And Trump said he would build a wall and the Mexicans would pay.Are you aware that some people tell lies?Trump would've built the wall, if he hadn't been stopped from doing it. I mean, if you promise to do something, then someone else stops you doing it, does that mean you told a lie?
Quote from: alancalverd on 27/02/2021 15:38:04Quote from: Jolly2 on 26/02/2021 19:27:50"a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote. So did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form? Either way, he should be in a circus, or maybe the space program.My grandmother used to cover the kitchen floor with newspaper whenever we left the dog in the house. One day she ran back and turned all the pages over. I asked why and she said "He can't read but he likes to look at the pictures."Probably a good use for the papersMax Blumenthal reports on how Britian is running a covert propaganda operation, MI6 has over 15,000 journalists employed to lie to readers. Both the BBC and Reuters are involved along with many other media outlets. They have atleast 400 journalists active inside Russia that were trained by Mi6 in London .To quote Max "everything they are acusing Russia of doing, they(Britian) are doing times 10 over"//www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDfjIqXJNz8Looks like YouTube or someone has blocked the video, you can still find the report by Max Blumenthal on his site.https://orinocotribune.com/reuters-bbc-and-bellingcat-participated-in-covert-uk-foreign-office-funded-programs-to-weaken-russia-leaked-docs-reveal/"In several proposals to the British Foreign Office, Reuters boasted of a global influence network of 15,000 journalists and staff, including 400 inside Russia."In 2019, the FCO put forward a similar initiative, this time articulating a more aggressive plan to “counter the Russian government’s narrative and domination of the media and information space.” In effect, the British government was seeking to infiltrate Russian media and propagate its own narrative through an influence network of Russian journalists trained in the UK.In its first bid, the media giant boasted of establishing a global network of 15,000 journalists and bloggers through “capacity building interventions.” In Russia, it claimed at least 400 journalists had been cultivated through its training programs.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 26/02/2021 19:27:50"a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote. So did the dog vote in person or fill in a postal ballot form? Either way, he should be in a circus, or maybe the space program.My grandmother used to cover the kitchen floor with newspaper whenever we left the dog in the house. One day she ran back and turned all the pages over. I asked why and she said "He can't read but he likes to look at the pictures."
"a woman saying her service dog microchp ID number was used as a Social Security number to register the pet and vote.
Quote from: charles1948 on 28/02/2021 18:18:01Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/02/2021 17:46:04Quote from: Jolly2 on 28/02/2021 17:41:36We don't know, the women who made the claim said she checked and her dog had voted. And Trump said he would build a wall and the Mexicans would pay.Are you aware that some people tell lies?Trump would've built the wall, if he hadn't been stopped from doing it. I mean, if you promise to do something, then someone else stops you doing it, does that mean you told a lie?It was always impossible that it would be true.So, if I promise to jump over the moon (Knowing that I can't) , it doesn't matter if, for example, I get jailed for something and am prevented from pretending to try, I am still a liar for claiming that I could do it.
Its clear Trump wanted to build the wall,
I never took that idea seriously,
Aren't all politicians liars?
No Kryptid, the county clerk checked that name. The women said she checked and the dog had, ergo maybe the name the owner checked wasn't Maggie Magoo Vela, maybe it was Maggie Vela, or Maggie Magoo or Magoo Vela.
The woman furthered that her dog was registered to vote using its microchip number that had inexplicably been converted to a Social Security number. According to the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services, a microchip is a nine-digit number just like a Social Security card — but the woman did not provide either number or a birthdate, making it impossible for us to verify whether there was a registered voter by that name in California.When she supposedly asked for the “voting place” to look for her dog’s file under its name, “Maggie Vela,” the woman was told that her dog had “already voted” under a mail-in ballot. But the woman never provided the registration number, name, or birthdate of her dog, so it is impossible to look up the voter card.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 28/02/2021 17:43:46No Kryptid, the county clerk checked that name. The women said she checked and the dog had, ergo maybe the name the owner checked wasn't Maggie Magoo Vela, maybe it was Maggie Vela, or Maggie Magoo or Magoo Vela.Check out this article by Snopes: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dog-voted-presidential-election/QuoteThe woman furthered that her dog was registered to vote using its microchip number that had inexplicably been converted to a Social Security number. According to the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services, a microchip is a nine-digit number just like a Social Security card — but the woman did not provide either number or a birthdate, making it impossible for us to verify whether there was a registered voter by that name in California.When she supposedly asked for the “voting place” to look for her dog’s file under its name, “Maggie Vela,” the woman was told that her dog had “already voted” under a mail-in ballot. But the woman never provided the registration number, name, or birthdate of her dog, so it is impossible to look up the voter card.If her claim is true and she really wanted this matter to be properly investigated, then you would think that she would have tried to help by providing the needed information.
So all we have is her word. That's it. She said that she couldn't even access the e-mail that supposedly notified her of the dog's vote, so we don't have anything objective to support her claim.
Trump would've built the wall, if he hadn't been stopped from doing it.
Quote from: charles1948 on 28/02/2021 18:18:01Trump would've built the wall, if he hadn't been stopped from doing it.Nobody stopped him. Quite a bit if it is still there. Problem with a boundary wall, of course, is that it is useless until it is complete. Or somebody invents the ladder.
The reports never listed not enough evidence to know they made claims that the suggestion had been investigated and proven false, which is actually fake news.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 01/03/2021 16:07:52The reports never listed not enough evidence to know they made claims that the suggestion had been investigated and proven false, which is actually fake news.Enough of an investigation was done to show that it was highly unlikely. They looked up the dog's name and didn't find it. If they didn't look up the right name, she doesn't seem to have tried correcting them on the matter. She can't provide any documentation for her claims. The entire story rings of falsehood.In either case, this was apparently an isolated event. If there were enough false votes based on pet ID numbers to influence the results of the election, it would have been found by the authorities who investigated it.