0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This state of afairs, I would suggest, tells us that, what we call the strong nuclear force is in fact just gravity towards the extreme end of it's range.
So, if I am saying that gravity and magnetism are the same thing then how come one is dipolar, while the other is monopolar.
Well, we could think of it like this, every single particle in the universe is connected to every other particle in the universe by this gravitational thread, so there is a myriad of field lines eminating from each particle connecting it lightly, to the furthest reaches of the universe as well as strongly, to all nearby particles, but in addition every particle is also connected by gravity to itself, each particle is a tiny magnet with a gravitational field line connecting it's north pole to its south pole, this is the dipolar identity of gravity, gravity and magnetism are the same thing, and when many particles happen to be aligned, we have a magnet, whether it is a few atoms of iron or something as big as the earth.
What if, there are only two forces in the universe, one, an attractive force would be gravity, the other, a repulsive force would be the energy which every sub atomic particle possesses.
...each particle is a tiny magnet with a gravitational field line connecting it's north pole to its south pole...
They're not the same thing. Gravity couples to mass whereas electromagnetism couples to electric charge.
Could we explain human behaviour by developing a single "Grand Unified Theory" of the brain?
(Just a gut feeling.)
This implies there is a unification of gravity with negative charge inherent within the electron.
The change imbalance of oxide-2 implies that the EM force, although unified, has become slanted toward the magnetic side.
This allows a stronger magnetic attraction to overcome the electrostatic repulsion.
Negative charge and mass are a single unified entity, as the electron, where the differences become blurred into one state.
That is what a single particle state, with two properties, implies.
Negative charge and mass are a single unified entity, as the electron, where the differences become blurred into one state. This implies there is a unification of gravity with negative charge inherent within the electron. That is what a single particle state, with two properties, implies. At some level gravity and negative charge are interchangeable
The positive charge, by not being unified, even with the substantial mass of the proton, can be shared with the neutron, via the magnetic fields, that positive charge will create via the proton.
The faster the motion of the charge, the stronger the magnetic field
Neither oxygen atoms, not oxide ions are magnetic.
Ehm...
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/05/2021 12:59:43Ehm...So, you don't know the difference between a molecule and an atom.
Also protons and electrons have the same amount of electric charge - only opposite, so together their net electric charge is 0 - despite having different atomic masses
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/05/2021 12:59:43Also protons and electrons have the same amount of electric charge - only opposite, so together their net electric charge is 0 - despite having different atomic massesIt is very important when discussing scientific principles to use the proper definitions to avoid confusion. Both protons and electrons have mass, but neither have an atomic mass. Atomic mass is the mass of atoms and isotopes of the different elements. Atomic mass involves only the protons and neutrons in the atom and does not include the mass of the electrons.
The protons and neutrons of the nucleus account for nearly all of the total mass of atoms, with the electrons and nuclear binding energy making minor contributions.
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/05/2021 18:53:11The protons and neutrons of the nucleus account for nearly all of the total mass of atoms, with the electrons and nuclear binding energy making minor contributions.It looks like I recalled that wrong. The units for atomic mass are the amu. The amu is defined as exactly 1/12 the mass of a carbon atom so that includes electrons.As you know from the definition you looked up it is also not correct to refer to an electron or a proton as having an atomic mass.
"The oxygen atom has 2 unpaired electrons in the 2p orbital and based on the above discussion, we can say that it is paramagnetic."
no one here is perfect
Mind you, did you think the video was someone pouring atomic oxygen?
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 15/05/2021 19:49:20no one here is perfectThere's a lot of that about.:-)