0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Just to understand:Does this quote:Quote from: Kartazion on 25/02/2022 02:01:40Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur. is different from:Quote from: Kartazion on 25/02/2022 19:41:48... the atom makes the matter and that the evolution uses the matter to exist.?
Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason and tool for the constitution of relativistic physics, and allows evolution to occur.
... the atom makes the matter and that the evolution uses the matter to exist.
You just have to understand that evolution would not exist without the atom (quantum mechanics).
To imply the illusory aspect of reality to evolution. Did you get it?
The illusory aspect of reality due to the rules of quantum mechanics due to the measurement problem eg. Schrodinger's cat.
Conclusion creation is a decoy and we are in a matrix.
Quote from: Kartazion on 26/02/2022 00:11:50To imply the illusory aspect of reality to evolution. Did you get it?No.
Quote from: Kartazion on 26/02/2022 00:33:42Conclusion creation is a decoy and we are in a matrix.Ok, I get it, you don't want a serious discussion. Bye.
Quote from: Kartazion on 25/02/2022 18:52:59There is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence is involved in evolution, and there is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence isn't involved in evolution.No there isn't. There is no evidence that there is a creator involved at all so how could there possibly be a 50 percent chance?If I see an unidentified flying object, I guess you could say it is either terrestrial or an alien. It is not a 50% - 50% chance it is an alien or terrestrial, it is almost a 100% chance it is terrestrial.
There is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence is involved in evolution, and there is a 50% chance that a creator or intelligence isn't involved in evolution.
Pretty much every conclusion you came up with in your harmonic oscillatory thread was wrong.
So somewhere out there is a real me doing this, and I'm just simulating my actions.
One reason for a simulator S is to predict the behavior of the real system R. Very handy for fixing Apollo 13, to pick one spectacular example. So right now your creator is remodelling R in response to what I have done in S (otherwise S' won't be a true representation of R'). So anything I do in S will result in a change in both S and R, so I am in control of R. In other words the "real" world is now a puppet of the simulation. Which rather changes the implied meanings of simulation and creator.Another type of simulator is used to train in hazardous ops without using live ammunition/passengers/whatever, so we can handle the real world as if we were experienced operators. That makes a bit of religious sense if you believe in an afterlife, but it does mean that the afterlife will be damn close to this one, which is exactly what religion doesn't preach. Little point in S being a Cessna150 if R is an Airbus380, or vice versa, though IIRC Buddhism does suggest a progression through various levels of command and Judaeo-Christianity even confers wings on its graduates!
we may be living inside a simulation.
I rather think that you want to discredit the simulation hypothesis
I repeat: simulation of what? If you can't answer that question, the hypothesis is meaningless.
I presented a logical examination of the "simulation hypothesis" which shows it to be bunk. No expertise needed, just common sense.