[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

If a number 4 represent the stronger force and a number 2 represent the weaker force what makes the net force is the subtraction

Exactly.

How?

[Kryptid]

How?

Are you asking me how to do subtraction?

[Bored chemist]

How do you address the problem that dead bodies weigh exactly the same as live ones?

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

How do you address the problem that dead bodies weigh exactly the same as live ones?

They weigh the same The idea is dead bodies meat do not have force in it then I can not apply my concept and because the meat can not lift itself the only way is to be lift by another force which must be greater.

[Bored chemist]

How do you address the problem that dead bodies weigh exactly the same as live ones?

They weigh the same The idea is dead bodies meat do not have force in it then I can not apply my concept and because the meat can not lift itself the only way is to be lift by another force which must be greater.

I'm sorry, but that made no sense.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

We can detect photons, so they exist: https://spie.org/publications/fg08_p34_photon_detectors?SSO=1#:~:text=Photon%20detectors%20count%20photons%20of,Cu2O%2C%20etc.)

Scientists explain the results by accepting that photons exist.
They are real.
We have proof of them.
The question is why don't you believe that?

I presented two experiments that prove my discovery. why rejection?

[Origin]

I presented two experiments that prove my discovery. why rejection?

The rejection is due to the fact that your idea is basically insane.

[Bored chemist]

I presented two experiments

You presented words on a screen.
Anyone can do that.
But you didn't actually show any experiment.

[Kryptid]

I presented two experiments that prove my discovery. why rejection?

Are you talking about photons or body mass?

In either case, you're just plain wrong.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I presented two experiments that prove my discovery. why rejection?

In either case, you're just plain wrong.

No. I am not.

[Bored chemist]

I presented two experiments that prove my discovery. why rejection?

In either case, you're just plain wrong.

No. I am not.

You are clearly wrong about saying you have shown experiments.
Why should we believe you about anything else?

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I presented two experiments

You presented words on a screen.
Anyone can do that.
But you didn't actually show any experiment.

I can do them. I can show them. Any-one can do them and verify them by himself. But I am sure 100% no scientist will care.

[Origin]

But I am sure 100% no scientist will care.

Now that I agree with.

[Bored chemist]

I can do them.

Go on then.

But remember that simple equipment like bathroom scales are not able to make reliable measurements in all conditions.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I can do them.

Go on then.

What do you think will happen then?  will any university try to do the experiment to make it public?

[Origin]

What do you think will happen then?  will any university try to do the experiment to make it public?

If I am on a scale and I weigh 60 kg, if I raise up on my toes the scale will not read 120 kg as I am rising up, I believe that is your experiment.  But that result is the expected out come based on simple physics.  You seem to think the scale should read 120 kg but no one who has a basic grasp of mechanics would come to that conclusion.   

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

This is more explanation to my two experiments:
A human mass can be treated as a smaller mass when a human lifts or moves his own body.
All mechanics equations can be applied for a smaller mass . If a human pushes a wall " he pushes his own body" In the equation of Newton's second law F=ma m equals x kg which is smaller than 60 kg
In my experiments the person lifts a smaller mass of his body equals x kg I can treat the human mass as x kg when he lifts his body.
If a person jumps "he moves his own body " he will jump with a smaller mass x smaller than 60 kg that why he can jump high but he will barely move a rock of 60 kg

[Bored chemist]

A human mass can be treated as a smaller mass when a human lifts or moves his own body.

No it can't.
Imagine hanging a ladder from a spring balance or putting it on a bathroom scale.
If I climb the ladder at a constant speed the weight is (in my case) about 70Kg plus the weight of the ladder.

There's really now way round this.
It's just that you don't understand that people's muscles are stronger than you think they are.

  will any university try to do the experiment to make it public?

Of course not. It is ludicrous.

[Kryptid]

he will jump with a smaller mass x smaller than 60 kg that why he can jump high but he will barely move a rock of 60 kg

I am completely baffled by the fact that you don't seem to understand that carrying a 60 kilogram rock means your legs are carrying more total weight than if they only had to carrying your own body weight without a rock.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

A human mass can be treated as a smaller mass when a human lifts or moves his own body.

No it can't.

There are two options in the experiment:
Whether the person lifts his body mass 60 kg with x kg or the x kg lifts a smaller mass of human body x kg
I chose the body to be smaller mass x kg because of the observation below:

I am completely baffled by the fact that you don't seem to understand that carrying a 60 kilogram rock means your legs are carrying more total weight than if they only had to carrying your own body weight without a rock.

I said jump high and barely move the rock
Doubling the load 120 kg must not give the big difference but it did, a very easy 60 kg"body" vs a very difficult 120 kg"body+the rock"
can't you see the difference between jumping with high speed against gravity with even exerting your greatest force to lift a rock of 60 kg.