The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Down

This is definitely the first Perpetual motion

  • 160 Replies
  • 27414 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #100 on: 29/09/2022 17:41:50 »
Quote from: perPedes on 29/09/2022 17:36:24
because they all came from obviously comletly empty heads

Please don't insult our members. That's against the rules.
Logged
 



Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #101 on: 29/09/2022 17:56:46 »
ok this is good enough for a slow motion.  You think I m the insulting one inhere. realy ?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #102 on: 29/09/2022 18:21:25 »
Quote from: perPedes on 29/09/2022 17:36:24
you have the maschine
No, we don't.
Quote from: perPedes on 29/09/2022 17:56:46
  You think I m the insulting one inhere. realy ?
Yes.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #103 on: 29/09/2022 21:38:38 »
if I confess, could you please slowly start an reasonable and thorough analysis of the calculation with all the power, this forum has !

please give me all people herein that want only to calculate to be happy. for the rest I want to say, please apologize my behavior, that must mean to  you I m a kind of a Neandertaler. Thank you with lots of sugar
« Last Edit: 29/09/2022 22:28:06 by perPedes »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #104 on: 29/09/2022 22:34:13 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/09/2022 18:21:25
Quote from: perPedes on Today at 17:36:24
you have the maschine
No, we don't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #105 on: 29/09/2022 22:43:59 »
...  cause you won't
« Last Edit: 29/09/2022 22:53:18 by perPedes »
Logged
 

Offline Georginajackson

  • First timers
  • *
  • 7
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #106 on: 30/09/2022 11:58:48 »
Quote from: perPedes on 27/09/2022 14:08:21
in the music store : I want the white accordeon and the red trumpet. - ok you can have the fire extinguisher but  the radiator has to stay here.
what.
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #107 on: 30/09/2022 15:02:42 »
Quote from: perPedes on 29/09/2022 21:38:38
if I confess, could you please slowly start an reasonable and thorough analysis of the calculation
What calculation are you referring to?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #108 on: 30/09/2022 15:11:52 »
Quote from: perPedes on 29/09/2022 22:43:59
...  cause you won't

Because you refuse to post them here.
Let me know when something changes.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #109 on: 30/09/2022 16:04:34 »
hi chemiest  seriously, i m sure you have some guys inhere, which like to calculate, so called Nerds. i would like to talk to them. where are they
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #110 on: 30/09/2022 16:08:45 »
Quote from: perPedes on 30/09/2022 16:04:34
hi chemiest  seriously, i m sure you have some guys inhere, which like to calculate, so called Nerds. i would like to talk to them. where are they

Like to calculate what?
Logged
 

Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #111 on: 30/09/2022 16:39:51 »
the calculation at (link removed)
« Last Edit: 27/10/2022 20:03:48 by Colin2B »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #112 on: 30/09/2022 16:44:59 »
Quote from: perPedes on 30/09/2022 16:39:51
the calculation at (link removed)
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/09/2022 15:11:52
Because you refuse to post them here.
Let me know when something changes.

« Last Edit: 27/10/2022 20:04:15 by Colin2B »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #113 on: 30/09/2022 16:52:33 »
i dont refuse, i cant technical. please go to hwcv copy the calculation and put it in, thank you
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #114 on: 30/09/2022 17:17:37 »
Do you mean this?
(link removed)
« Last Edit: 27/10/2022 20:04:34 by Colin2B »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #115 on: 30/09/2022 17:26:25 »
Quote from: perPedes on 30/09/2022 16:39:51
the calculation at hwcv
What on earth is hwcv? You are just obfuscation, refusing to post calculations and referring us to other sites. Why should we have to go out of our way to entertain your childish nonsense?
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #116 on: 30/09/2022 17:52:06 »
Quote from: perPedes on 30/09/2022 16:39:51
the calculation at (link removed)
Humorous Walruses Chasing Voles?
« Last Edit: 27/10/2022 20:04:51 by Colin2B »
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #117 on: 30/09/2022 17:53:56 »
Quote from: perPedes on 30/09/2022 16:52:33
i dont refuse, i cant technical. please go to hwcv copy the calculation and put it in, thank you

Is there any particular reason you can't post it here yourself? If you take a look at the reply screen, a lot of scientific symbols are available to insert into your post. Surely you could use those to recreate your calculations here?
Logged
 

Offline perPedes (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 44
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #118 on: 01/10/2022 09:02:27 »
<link removed>
« Last Edit: 27/10/2022 17:46:50 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: This is definitely the first Perpetual motion
« Reply #119 on: 01/10/2022 17:15:36 »
That's almost useful.
But, like a lot of people here, I don't understand German. (I'd be able to get by if it was in French...)

Are you able to say if Google's translation is good enough?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: perpetual motion 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.929 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.