[Kartazion (OP)]

Supermassive black hole can also emit not visible gamma photons by its jets or streams.

[JLindgaard]

What do you see on the other side of a black hole?

Depends on what you mean by "other side". Black holes probably look just about the same from all outside angles (except for the quickly spinning ones, which would be oblate spheroids instead of spheres). If you are asking about inside a black hole, then you probably wouldn't see anything.

Black holes emit no light.

If they are small enough, the Hawking radiation they emit should contain visible light.

 Maybe we can start here? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249963778_Distorted_Five-dimensional_Electrically_Charged_Black_Holes

[Bored chemist]

This implies that you consider me quite influential.

No. It implies that you are deluded.
You said

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war.

It doesn't matter what I or my knees do. It's not going to affect whether or not there's a war.
But you claim there is some way it will.

[Kartazion (OP)]

This implies that you consider me quite influential.

No. It implies that you are deluded.
You said

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war.

It doesn't matter what I or my knees do. It's not going to affect whether or not there's a war.
But you claim there is some way it will.

So if I talk about war between you and me then you think it's Putin's war? I wonder why you made this connection.

[Bored chemist]

So if I talk about war between you and me...

If you talk about something that doesn't exist , you look stupid.

[Bored chemist]

I wonder why you made this connection.

Which part of this did you not understand?

The most likely cause of war at the minute is that maniac Putin.

[Kartazion (OP)]

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war

The most likely cause of war at the minute is that maniac Putin.
My recognition of some crackpot idea here isn't going to influence him, is it?

Do you think I can influence him then?

Why?
___________

PS: I choose b:

declare war (on somebody/something) (https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/declare-war-on-somebody-something)
a) to state officially that you are at war with another country
b) informal to say that something is wrong and that you will do everything you can to stop it

[Bored chemist]

Do you think I can influence him then?

What I am saying is that my looking at your twaddle will not influence him and is thus very unlikely to influence the likelihood of war and thus you were wrong to say this.

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war.

[Bored chemist]

So if I talk about war between you and me...

If you talk about something that doesn't exist , you look stupid.

[Kryptid]

b) informal to say that something is wrong and that you will do everything you can to stop it

I'm curious about what exactly you plan to do in regards to this. You're not threatening our forum, are you?

[Kartazion (OP)]

You're not threatening our forum, are you?

What? Threaten a forum? Already I don't see how. How can we threaten a website? Did you take me for a hacker or what?

[Kryptid]

What? Threaten a forum? Already I don't see how. How can we threaten a website? Did you take me for a hacker or what?

You tell me. You're the one saying you're going to war if your theory isn't accepted.

[JLindgaard]

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war

The most likely cause of war at the minute is that maniac Putin.
My recognition of some crackpot idea here isn't going to influence him, is it?

Do you think I can influence him then?

Why?
___________

PS: I choose b:

declare war (on somebody/something) (https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/declare-war-on-somebody-something)
a) to state officially that you are at war with another country
b) informal to say that something is wrong and that you will do everything you can to stop it

 Are you talking about Ukraine? If so Putin should've learned from OPEC. OPEC did an oil embargo in 1973/74
to change America's attitude towards OPEC countries. And do you know what? It worked. And at the moment much worse than that is happening. Now it's more about economic warfare and even China knows this.
 As for crackpot theories, is 700 watts/m^2 really enough to warm the Earth to 20º C.? When you consider that 1m^2 of surface area also has a depth equal to 1 second of velocity of solar radiation.
And if that's 300,000km/s then the actual energy from the Sun warming the Earth's atmosphere would be about 17/300,000 of the 700 watts/m^2. That's be the total energy in the atmosphere from the Sun per square meter of surface area.
 If you consider using a solar panel to absorb energy, it is at one point/surface area that has minimal thickness.

[Bored chemist]

 As for crackpot theories, is 700 watts/m^2 really enough to warm the Earth to 20º C.?

No.
But nobody said it was.

[Bored chemist]

When you consider that 1m^2 of surface area also has a depth equal to 1 second of velocity of solar radiation.
And if that's 300,000km/s then the actual energy from the Sun warming the Earth's atmosphere would be about 17/300,000 of the 700 watts/m^2. That's be the total energy in the atmosphere from the Sun per square meter of surface area.

That doesn't seem to mean anything.
The ground keeps the air warm.

If you consider using a solar panel to absorb energy, it is at one point/surface area that has minimal thickness.

That's also confused.
The thickness of a panel is typically fairly thin but the thickness isn't a particularly important design criterion.
Solar water heaters are about an inch thick. PV cells are about a mm or so.

[JLindgaard]

If you consider using a solar panel to absorb energy, it is at one point/surface area that has minimal thickness.

That's also confused.
The thickness of a panel is typically fairly thin but the thickness isn't a particularly important design criterion.
Solar water heaters are about an inch thick. PV cells are about a mm or so.

 You missed the point I was making. It shows that you've never studied Boltzmann's Ideal Gas Law or other science
that applies to earth science, geosciences or atmospheric chemistry. 17/300,000 = 0.000056667
Multiply that by 700 and you get 0.0396 w/m^2 for each km. If the ground is radiating heat, the same math applies.
And divide 0.0396 by 1,000 and you get 0.000039667 w/m^3.
 And that's if you accept that solar radiation emitted by the Sun or refracted radiation from the ground travels at the speed of light. Isn't math and science fun?

[Bored chemist]

It shows that you've never studied Boltzmann's Ideal Gas Law

Nor has anyone else.
The ideal gas law ".was first stated by Benoît Paul Émile Clapeyron in 1834 as a combination of the empirical Boyle's law, Charles's law, Avogadro's law, and Gay-Lussac's law.[1] The ideal gas law is often written in an empirical form:"

It seems you don't understand that a significant fraction of the earth's heat comes from radioactive decay of things like uranium and thorium.

And it seems that you don't understand that Boltzmann's law of radiation is only applicable to black bodies.

And I accept that I miss the point of this
17/300,000
and that's because you never said what the point was.
You never said what those numbers are, did you?

[Bored chemist]

Isn't math and science fun?

Yes, you should try it some time.

[Kartazion (OP)]

 You missed the point I was making. It shows that you've never studied Boltzmann's Ideal Gas Law or other science
that applies to earth science, geosciences or atmospheric chemistry. 17/300,000 = 0.000056667
Multiply that by 700 and you get 0.0396 w/m^2 for each km. If the ground is radiating heat, the same math applies.
And divide 0.0396 by 1,000 and you get 0.000039667 w/m^3.
 And that's if you accept that solar radiation emitted by the Sun or refracted radiation from the ground travels at the speed of light. Isn't math and science fun?

Please open your own topic. Thanks.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Are you talking about Ukraine?

Of course not. Did you read the OP? It was the moderators and the experts who made the connection with the word war that I used.