The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 23   Go Down

Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)

  • 452 Replies
  • 61839 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #180 on: 14/10/2022 18:45:25 »
to suggest that a neutron can hold a charge! oh my god! how despicable of me.
To suggest that entanglements set the neutrons charge, oh no, how horrid.
to suggest that the proton and neutron squaring holds the charge... blasphemy! lol.
that suggestion, if it exists, could change probabilities of perpetual systems in nature.
as in the number of them that exists.
is that all it takes to be considered a kook in your book?


kook is such a funny word.

my words get worse when i try to explain how it supposedly works.
I know, I can't find the words. But i can see the math, in my own special way.
I've been working hard since it hit me to be understood.
each time i try, i usually end up with bans, because people like to comment on my stability.
2 years of dedicated research. i put my main love on a slower self pace. I'm a poet.
my first release: https://www.amazon.com/Kilted-Weirdos-Poetry-Insane-Mind/dp/1087957664
but, let's save the trees. I'd rather give you a free copy.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vabiqvE2zibKdPq2cQtW2IGr9HroejPG?usp=sharing
I asked questions and got statements back. Why I was wrong. Not an open thought of, what if I'm right, even though we see much evidence that seems to state the contrary.
« Last Edit: 14/10/2022 19:14:02 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #181 on: 14/10/2022 19:41:37 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 17:55:24
autism. but you guys act as if i'm not trying.

I never said you weren't trying. If we can't understand the way you word your sentences, even if you are trying, that likely means this won't develop into a constructive dialogue.

I'm considering locking this because this is devolving into an argument between you and Bored Chemist. If you find Bored Chemist's words inflammatory, there is a way to block members so that you won't see their replies. Go to your profile by clicking on your username, then click on "Modify Profile" > "Buddies/Ignore List" > "Edit Ignore List", then type in that member's name.
« Last Edit: 14/10/2022 19:47:00 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #182 on: 14/10/2022 20:00:08 »
he's blocked. He kept speaking on me personally, never asked questions as to how, and kept being adamant. I know how ludicrous it sounds. I'm terrified it's true. Because if it is, all kinds of chaotic techniques could be harnessed.
wormhole travel. time portals. All connected to variations of 2^n=1/2^n via 2n+1=3.
a circle-based system (cylinder) would allow motion to transfer. a sphere would allow for perpetual systems.
the line technique turns a circle into a line. it straightens it out, in a way. it just reimagines it.
a torus based design could unlock time travel through wormholes.
« Last Edit: 15/10/2022 06:25:09 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #183 on: 15/10/2022 00:47:48 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 20:00:08
he's blocked.
Really?
This isn't an easy thing to google or whatever.
I'd really like to hear from someone with medical knowledge in the field because I'm hoping to provide the best response for those who have problems.


When we see posts that are clearly at odds with reality, and from someone with a declared mental heath issue, should we
(1) agree with their delusions
(2) point out the inconsistencies between their delusions and reality
(3) ignore the facts and "accommodate" their unreal views
(4) something else?

What's the right policy here? (Right in the sense of most likely to help the poster).
« Last Edit: 15/10/2022 00:56:00 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #184 on: 15/10/2022 06:22:47 »
this is what I've faced for two years.

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 065354.jpg (242.26 kB, 1187x1096 - viewed 99 times.)

* Screenshot 2022-10-14 114313.jpg (196.28 kB, 1171x894 - viewed 82 times.)

* 3 6 9 of energy and mass.png (51.54 kB, 1615x1273 - viewed 77 times.)
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #185 on: 15/10/2022 06:27:24 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/10/2022 00:47:48
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 14/10/2022 20:00:08
he's blocked.
Really?
This isn't an easy thing to google or whatever.
I'd really like to hear from someone with medical knowledge in the field because I'm hoping to provide the best response for those who have problems.


When we see posts that are clearly at odds with reality, and from someone with a declared mental heath issue, should we
(1) agree with their delusions
(2) point out the inconsistencies between their delusions and reality
(3) ignore the facts and "accommodate" their unreal views
(4) something else?

What's the right policy here? (Right in the sense of most likely to help the poster).
trust that after two decades living with my mental illness, years of therapy and actually learning to love myself, that i'm mostly better now. To the point that while i've gotten a little abbrasive to your abuse, I've still remained adamant on my position, tried to be clear of thoughts behind it, and why I think it's useful. 
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #186 on: 15/10/2022 11:38:35 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 06:27:24
tried to be clear of thoughts behind it
That's the problem
You have tried, but failed.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2318
  • Activity:
    31.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #187 on: 15/10/2022 13:12:29 »
Leaving the numerology and rows aside, there are many things that seem impossible now that may become possible in the future. However "free energy" or "overunity" are absolutely impossible. If there was such phenomena we would not have a stable universe such as we have now.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #188 on: 15/10/2022 13:38:14 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 06:27:24
trust that after two decades living with my mental illness, years of therapy and actually learning to love myself, that i'm mostly better now.
That is great, I am glad that you are doing better.  Unfortunately what you have written here appears to be nonsense.  I can't make 'heads or tails' of what you are trying to say.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #189 on: 15/10/2022 14:25:04 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/10/2022 11:38:35
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 06:27:24
tried to be clear of thoughts behind it
That's the problem
You have tried, but failed.
at least i didn't fail at being a decent human being. why are you still commenting. You that ego triggered?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #190 on: 15/10/2022 15:03:55 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 15/10/2022 13:12:29
Leaving the numerology and rows aside, there are many things that seem impossible now that may become possible in the future. However "free energy" or "overunity" are absolutely impossible. If there was such phenomena we would not have a stable universe such as we have now.
Voynich Manuscript. Biernacki ms 408,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_manuscript
The Voynich manuscript is an illustrated codex hand-written in an otherwise unknown writing system, referred to as 'Voynichese'.[18] The vellum on which it is written has been carbon-dated to the early 15th century (1404–1438),
where manifest destiny kicked off soon after.
look at page 67v. wonder if it states the existence of a holy ghost particle.

regular atomic build:
1/5+2/5+2/5=1
compared to what i'm suggesting:
1/6+2/6+3/6=1





* PXL_20220826_172906348.jpg (2025.94 kB, 4080x3072 - viewed 72 times.)
« Last Edit: 15/10/2022 15:10:39 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #191 on: 15/10/2022 15:10:26 »
Quote from: Origin on 15/10/2022 13:38:14
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 06:27:24
trust that after two decades living with my mental illness, years of therapy and actually learning to love myself, that i'm mostly better now.
That is great, I am glad that you are doing better.  Unfortunately what you have written here appears to be nonsense.  I can't make 'heads or tails' of what you are trying to say.
then ask questions. like if a ghost particle interaction exists, why don't we see signs of it.
we do. we just don't realize the signs because we think our atomic model is accurate.
We must realize the possibility of something existing before we consider evidence for it.

Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #192 on: 15/10/2022 15:13:55 »
my interpretation of page 67v.
it would double energy to mass ratio in the universe.

* 67v - Copy.jpg (1716.72 kB, 4300x3844 - viewed 84 times.)
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #193 on: 15/10/2022 15:22:39 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 15/10/2022 13:12:29
Leaving the numerology and rows aside, there are many things that seem impossible now that may become possible in the future. However "free energy" or "overunity" are absolutely impossible. If there was such phenomena we would not have a stable universe such as we have now.
unless time repeats in the same area. what gives the big bang its energy? tesseracts. they constantly send energy to center. so at the end of a universes life span, it goes to pure energy, is taken apart (mainly by chaos theory) and is then simply restarted. with restarting universes, a multiverse has double the lifespan. at the highest level of the multiverse systems of layers, time is infinite, but can also repair itself. this is because of lower perpetual systems always providing energy. through millions of universes.

btw, origin. thank you for caring. i mean that. we should all care about those we interact with more. it would make the world a better place. that's why i don't prefer to block people, but take time to cool down to where i have the patience for what they say and do.

2^n+1/2(2^n)
96 universes per multiverse.
192 multiverses per mega-verse
384 mega-verses per giga-verse
768 giga-verses per tetra-verse.

768*384=294912 mega-verses per tetra-verse
294912*192=56623104 multiverses per tetra-verse
56623104*96=5,435,817,984 universes per tetra-verse.

electron shell diagram helps describe number of higher levels, as it is the closest interaction to Horus eye. and is what perpetual systems work through.

the tetra-verse simply pushes out over-excess of energy.
at atomic levels, all atoms produce in excess so it's easy to see it as non-perpetual. they are just exchanging data. if all produce in excess (besides isotopes), it balances out by other atoms. some (isotopes) soak up said excess energy to suspend themselves and their lifetime.
« Last Edit: 15/10/2022 15:27:08 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2318
  • Activity:
    31.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #194 on: 15/10/2022 17:10:56 »
What has an ancient indecipherable manuscript got in connection with science? Zero relevance in my opinion.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #195 on: 15/10/2022 18:15:26 »
physics has developed over history. addition by addition. Mostly written in Europe.
the church's reaction to the manuscript shows the relevance.
It shows that the church was looking to destroy evidence of perpetuality.
because perpetual systems are directly against the bible, when understood from physics aspects.
it disproves heaven. unless heaven is the "after" of an advanced civilization.
They kept the ban on alchemy. fusion and fission. tick up, tick down. alchemy.
The book is undecipherable, unless you consider a modification to atomic theory.
the charged neutron particle is stated on page 67v. bottom left corner. in red green blue. look at particle physics. we use red, green, blue.
its bisected, and then a one half piece is further bisected.
Threats of ex-communication could easily control kingdoms.
Kingdoms had armies, which could control flow of science.
The roman catholic church has long been invested in science, while being publicly dismissive.

* papal decrees 1500's.jpg (190.27 kB, 2398x349 - viewed 90 times.)

* 67v - Copy.jpg (1716.72 kB, 4300x3844 - viewed 93 times.)
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #196 on: 15/10/2022 18:25:09 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 14:25:04
why are you still commenting.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:36:47
I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #197 on: 15/10/2022 18:26:08 »
evidence does remain of the deception. No one currently alive would be at fault.
Could the sun god be the way ancient people spoke of fusion?
Could the moon god be the way ancient people spoke of fission?

* Disc of Sabu.jpg (228.24 kB, 3364x709 - viewed 84 times.)

* Screenshot 2022-06-02 063341.jpg (1244.44 kB, 1917x1612 - viewed 90 times.)
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #198 on: 15/10/2022 18:27:01 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/10/2022 18:25:09
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 14:25:04
why are you still commenting.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:36:47
I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.
Good for you. You have no problem being a bully and douchebag.

* Respect Can Heal.png (59.78 kB, 957x690 - viewed 88 times.)
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #199 on: 15/10/2022 18:31:43 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 15/10/2022 18:25:09
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 15/10/2022 14:25:04
why are you still commenting.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2022 18:36:47
I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.
I've asked you several times. You think just because its a forum it gives you the right to talk down on me because life handed me lemons. Well, bro. It just shows how little you care about what affects you bring to people. if truly down, do you think your continued pressure to shut up would be a healthy thing? no. but your ego prevents that thought. you just don't like what i'm talking about. that's your right. it is not your right, however, to continue harassment. I've blocked you. a clear sign of no longer wanting contact. but yet, here you are replying. I still see and get notified of your reply. I'm asking you, politely, to step away. Please. People have seen your warnings. You did what you set out to do. any further is harassment. Your warnings are not disappearing. congrats. you succeeded in being heard with your stubbornness to consider any possibilities other than what you have learned. Do I need to shut up to not be harassed? that would be bullying.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 23   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: delusion  / pseudoscience 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.701 seconds with 69 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.