[alancalverd]

Another candidate heaves into view!

KW: Bring me a working model of your perpetual motion machine, and I will make you unimaginably wealthy. Investors and engineers are standing by, but losing their patience.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Another candidate heaves into view!

KW: Bring me a working model of your perpetual motion machine, and I will make you unimaginably wealthy. Investors and engineers are standing by, but losing their patience.

help me figure out a way to safely harness it.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

No matter how much word salad you write, the laws of physics still prevent perpetual motion.

I guess this is not seen as insulting language. So, I'm good on replies. I don't like open hypocrisy.

[Bored chemist]

I guess this is not seen as insulting language.

Not if it's true.

Do you realise that posting antiscientific nonsense on a science site, cluttering the board and chewing up bandwidth is douchebaggery?

[Colin2B]

No matter how much word salad you write, the laws of physics still prevent perpetual motion.

I guess this is not seen as insulting language. So, I'm good on replies. I don't like open hypocrisy.

Word salad is an acceptable term for a collection of words which together do not make any discernible sense. Doucebag is not an acceptable term for another forum member.
This is a physics forum, so we do expect the laws of physics to be applied to any new hypothesis, or at least a meaningful defence of why they might not apply.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I guess this is not seen as insulting language.

Not if it's true.

Do you realise that posting antiscientific nonsense on a science site, cluttering the board and chewing up bandwidth is douchebaggery?

douchebaggery is not acceptable language sir. if you can decide that so can i. so your word salad comment. rude as ****. don't reply.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

No matter how much word salad you write, the laws of physics still prevent perpetual motion.

I guess this is not seen as insulting language. So, I'm good on replies. I don't like open hypocrisy.

Word salad is an acceptable term for a collection of words which together do not make any discernible sense. Doucebag is not an acceptable term for another forum member.
This is a physics forum, so we do expect the laws of physics to be applied to any new hypothesis, or at least a meaningful defence of why they might not apply.

Scientists at Chalmers University of Technology in Göteborg, Sweden discovered that the atom makes the softest sounds physically possible, identifying that the sound hits a "D-note." The atom's sound is so soft that scientists could not hear it.Sep 12, 2014
explain it without perpetuality.
if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

this is the flip i'm talking about. at least a majority of it being charge. (might effect spin and mass to)
mass=inertia reserve.

[Bored chemist]

explain it without perpetuality.
if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3.

Thank you for illustrating what "word salad" means.

douchebaggery is not acceptable language sir.

You do realise that you just used it, don't you?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

explain it without perpetuality.
if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3.

Thank you for illustrating what "word salad" means.

douchebaggery is not acceptable language sir.

You do realise that you just used it, don't you?

favor. go read all your comments again. read mine again. see who started using insulting language (not just what you see as insulting) and ramping the other up. You kept coming at me. i got fed up and asked for distance. you kept coming. I'm not aloud to tell you to **** off. i'm not aloud time to collect my words. but yet you can behave however you see fit. get bent bro.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

explain it without perpetuality.
if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3.

Thank you for illustrating what "word salad" means.

douchebaggery is not acceptable language sir.

You do realise that you just used it, don't you?

favor. go read all your comments again. read mine again. see who started using insulting language (not just what you see as insulting) and ramping the other up. You kept coming at me. i got fed up and asked for distance. you kept coming. I'm not aloud to tell you to **** off. i'm not aloud time to collect my words. but yet you can behave however you see fit. get bent bro.

I guess google and sweden lies!

[Origin]

I guess google and sweden lies!

What do you think that proves?

[Bored chemist]

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

if atoms release sound, then they are releasing energy. whether constantly or timed. that's what I'm looking at. it states that it may be possible to build perpetual systems. I'm not trying to build one. but study the idea, hoping it help humanity.
we have to understand to safely build.

Noether's theorem i guess don't apply to an atom. which makes me ask, what else it might not apply to. is there another exception. but yet, look at your reaction.
i also suggested that 1 moment of time passes for neutron=3, proton=2, electron=1 growth.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

how does it make sound?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I guess google and sweden lies!

No.
The person who tries to say that a Swedish research institute said "if its truly a synthetic atom, then it shows vibrations can be in atoms. I'm trying to figure out the time when, to help understand the nature of said sound and vibrations. I said a perpetual machine might be possible. because of the evidence seen recently. way more recently then Noether's theorem. so explain both?
or maybe, there is a charge that builds and decreases in a neutron.
it would be near impossible to spot, unless you considered it existed and looked for it.
if it moves at c, then c^2 is two movements.
if it moves at c^2, proton sets stability. it moves at n/2 where neutron moves at n/3."
is lying.
Why do you do it?

see who started using insulting language

Turning up on a science page and talking about perpetual motion is an insult to science.
Yet you keep doing it.

you literally just called me a liar bro. leave me the **** alone.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I guess google and sweden lies!

What do you think that proves?

how do atoms make sound?

[Kryptid]

Atoms can make sound because they have thermal energy. That thermal energy will decrease over time as the atoms cool, which would make the sound quieter. Get them down to absolute zero and there would be no thermal energy left and therefore no sound. Even if that proved to be unreachable, the total thermal energy is still finite.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

physics is commonly accepted conjecture. doesn't mean we have nature down pat.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Atoms can make sound because they have thermal energy. That thermal energy will decrease over time as the atoms cool, which would make the sound quieter. Get them down to absolute zero and there would be no thermal energy left and therefore no sound. Even if that proved to be unreachable, the total thermal energy is still finite.

could that be seen as similar in space. with way reduced amount of function because of temperature?