[Bored chemist]

maybe you just struggle to understand

Can you provide evidence that anyone here has understood and agrees with you?

[Bored chemist]

because you believe a theorem over nature.

A theorem is part of nature.

Hexagons. and technically, they might not be. time is hard to discern. bilateral effects.

This is part of the problem.
If I ask "what is the time?" and you say "Orange pasta is less tuneful than Ermentrude ", have you answered the question?
It's certainly a reply; but it's not an answer.
And, whether you like it or not, it's your job to explain what you mean and you are not doing that.

I might be the least diplomatic about saying it, but I'm not the only one.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

because you believe a theorem over nature.

A theorem is part of nature.

Hexagons. and technically, they might not be. time is hard to discern. bilateral effects.

This is part of the problem.
If I ask "what is the time?" and you say "Orange pasta is less tuneful than Ermentrude ", have you answered the question?
It's certainly a reply; but it's not an answer.
And, whether you like it or not, it's your job to explain what you mean and you are not doing that.

I might be the least diplomatic about saying it, but I'm not the only one.

https://images.app.goo.gl/oE333KArn6pYLiNa9
imagine similar inside the atom.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

They may vibrate in some quantum sense even at absolute zero, but that doesn't represent the net creation of energy. That particular form of perpetual motion is therefore allowed, as it doesn't violate conservation of energy. They wouldn't always emit sound, either. They would only emit sound if they have enough energy to do so.

what i'm talking about is the tick time, and using distance to cheat it, to create a full energy. via 2n+1.
allowed for, because atoms tick a charge over time, to release that vibration.
1 energy, to two mass as inertia reserve, over 3 total movements.
2 up 1 down, allows for 1 full unit of energy every 3 moments.
time does not move, so we get speed.

2u+1d
4u+2d
6u+3d
6u+3d/2=3u+1.5d
(3u+1.5d)*2=6u+3d
time is a constant. we can set distance to a constant. meaning speed has to react.
energy cannot be created nor destroyed, except under special circumstance. Are we sure we know all exceptions?
nature would use this for expansion energy.

[Kryptid]

energy cannot be created nor destroyed, except under special circumstance. Are we sure we know all exceptions?

We know that any such circumstances must involve violation of time symmetry. We have the proof for it.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

energy cannot be created nor destroyed, except under special circumstance. Are we sure we know all exceptions?

We know that any such circumstances must involve violation of time symmetry. We have the proof for it.

so if one already occured, and our Sysnthetic atoms were involved in releasing the time loop?
1+3^2+3^3+3^4=118

[Kryptid]

Unfortunately, I don't know what it means to release a time loop.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Unfortunately, I don't know what it means to release a time loop.

conscious observation wouldn't notice much difference. the importance would lie in the multiverse construct and continuation of an individual timeline interaction. parallels are based on time, not our choices.
as we see n rise, our number of comfortable habitable areas for timelines increases. meaning the more time goes, the more instances of available parallels can be created. at the end of each cycle, a reduction and rearrangement takes place. its so fast we don't notice it. because of the mega-verse, we see different stacking times. or actual differences in each timelines actions, the effects of mass and force interacting.
Mandella effect is caused when we reduce the total amount of energy in our own system (universe) making the multiverse reset using other multiverses in our mega-verse collection. we literally borrow design templates for information (mass, energy) from multiple times, creating cross data connections. IE Mandella memory effects.
Its also why dementia patients jump back in time, but remember it so specifically.

time itself is the infinite system. the lower levels keep it flowing. no matter what we do. unless we hit nature's pause button by crossing two time portal tail syphons. one to the past + one to the future. they are reverse direction, when seen from a relative viewpoint.
tesseracts in time allow big bang.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

the chances of actions reducing energy to a crash seem to follow this flow direction:
man made cold fusion (perpetual apple design)>man made fission>Cern>fusion>cold fusion (atomic)

It is a natural process that nature takes advantage of. chaos theory.
Chaos theory describes breaking or splitting things.
Collatz describes building things.
n/2=0.5n

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifurcation_diagram
Symmetry breaking in pitchfork bifurcation as the parameter ε is varied. ε = 0 is the case of symmetric pitchfork bifurcation.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

notice the only number involved. two.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CollatzConjecture/comments/u9a8jt/collatz_butterfly/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
source of the collatz images.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

flower of life.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

sorry. realized an error in that last image. not mirrored right.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

if natural numbers form a sphere, and mathematics just traverses the sphere, then we have approached situations wrong.

3^3 is a cube with 3 units on each side. 2^3 is a cube with 2 units on each side. both can make a sphere.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/scientists-spotted-something-that-appeared-to-be-moving-7-times-the-speed-of-light/ar-AA131c9E?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=0edffcae31a846eff02a677696a8ecf2
science and our understanding of it evolves.
pay attention to the fact it's two neutron stars and a 99.97 percent speed of light travel rate.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

because you believe a theorem over nature.

A theorem is part of nature.

Hexagons. and technically, they might not be. time is hard to discern. bilateral effects.

This is part of the problem.
If I ask "what is the time?" and you say "Orange pasta is less tuneful than Ermentrude ", have you answered the question?
It's certainly a reply; but it's not an answer.
And, whether you like it or not, it's your job to explain what you mean and you are not doing that.

I might be the least diplomatic about saying it, but I'm not the only one.

I am trying to sir. Do you think your approach to me, condescending talk, and unwarranted continuality is helping?

time is a rate of measure of the interactions of forces and mass. its observed, inferred, but not directly measurable. we have no good way to measure time. we are trying though. Advances is quantum physics and computing are helping, tremendously.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

because you believe a theorem over nature.

A theorem is part of nature.

Hexagons. and technically, they might not be. time is hard to discern. bilateral effects.

This is part of the problem.
If I ask "what is the time?" and you say "Orange pasta is less tuneful than Ermentrude ", have you answered the question?
It's certainly a reply; but it's not an answer.
And, whether you like it or not, it's your job to explain what you mean and you are not doing that.

I might be the least diplomatic about saying it, but I'm not the only one.

I am trying to sir. Do you think your approach to me, condescending talk, and unwarranted continuality is helping?

time is a rate of measure of the interactions of forces and mass. its observed, inferred, but not directly measurable. we have no good way to measure time. we are trying though. Advances is quantum physics and computing are helping, tremendously.

once we realize the flip charge component to a neutron, it'll get way more accurate.

[Bored chemist]

we have no good way to measure time.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=clock

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

we can create a cap for any whole number research.
why, because anything multiplied by one is itself. anything multiplied by less than one, is less than our original number. anything more, is more than our original number. when we use the step behavior of n tied to this, and watch for where our steps raise our distance to our new result past our original number, we find a border.
b+a=1
if a>b, then where a*n<b*n is a border.