The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 23   Go Down

Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)

  • 452 Replies
  • 61792 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #280 on: 16/10/2022 18:54:15 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/10/2022 18:51:00
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:39:52
we have no good way to measure time.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=clock
As of May 2010, the smallest time interval uncertainty in direct measurements is on the order of 12 attoseconds (1.2 × 10−17 seconds), about 3.7 × 1026 Planck times.[35]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #281 on: 16/10/2022 18:55:05 »
In medieval philosophical writings, the atom was a unit of time referred to as the smallest possible division of time. The earliest known occurrence in English is in Byrhtferth's Enchiridion (a science text) of 1010–1012,[33] where it was defined as 1/564 of a momentum (11⁄2 minutes),[34] and thus equal to 15/94 of a second. It was used in the computus, the process of calculating the date of Easter.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #282 on: 16/10/2022 18:56:03 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:55:05
In medieval philosophical writings, the atom was a unit of time referred to as the smallest possible division of time. The earliest known occurrence in English is in Byrhtferth's Enchiridion (a science text) of 1010–1012,[33] where it was defined as 1/564 of a momentum (11⁄2 minutes),[34] and thus equal to 15/94 of a second. It was used in the computus, the process of calculating the date of Easter.
why easter? if science has not been influenced by the search for god, why easter?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #283 on: 16/10/2022 18:59:10 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:56:03
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:55:05
In medieval philosophical writings, the atom was a unit of time referred to as the smallest possible division of time. The earliest known occurrence in English is in Byrhtferth's Enchiridion (a science text) of 1010–1012,[33] where it was defined as 1/564 of a momentum (11⁄2 minutes),[34] and thus equal to 15/94 of a second. It was used in the computus, the process of calculating the date of Easter.
why easter? if science has not been influenced by the search for god, why easter?
oh wait, is this evidence that the atom was known about and theorized as far back as 1010? what? impossible you say?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #284 on: 16/10/2022 19:01:20 »
Time is not an empirical concept. For neither co-existence nor succession would be perceived by us, if the representation of time did not exist as a foundation a priori. Without this presupposition, we could not represent to ourselves that things exist together at one and the same time, or at different times, that is, contemporaneously, or in succession.

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (1781), trans. Vasilis Politis (London: Dent., 1991), p.54.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #285 on: 16/10/2022 19:04:33 »
Ancient cultures such as Incan, Mayan, Hopi, and other Native American Tribes – plus the Babylonians, ancient Greeks, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and others – have a concept of a wheel of time: they regard time as cyclical and quantic,[clarification needed] consisting of repeating ages that happen to every being of the Universe between birth and extinction.[36]

In general, the Islamic and Judeo-Christian world-view regards time as linear[37] and directional,[38] beginning with the act of creation by God. The traditional Christian view sees time ending, teleologically,[39] with the eschatological end of the present order of things, the "end time".

In the Old Testament book Ecclesiastes, traditionally ascribed to Solomon (970–928 BC), time (as the Hebrew word עידן, זמן iddan (age, as in "Ice age") zĕman(time) is often translated) was traditionally regarded[by whom?] as a medium for the passage of predestined events.[citation needed] (Another word, زمان" זמן" zamān, meant time fit for an event, and is used as the modern Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew equivalent to the English word "time".)

Time in Greek mythology
The Greek language denotes two distinct principles, Chronos and Kairos. The former refers to numeric, or chronological, time. The latter, literally "the right or opportune moment", relates specifically to metaphysical or Divine time. In theology, Kairos is qualitative, as opposed to quantitative.[40]

In Greek mythology, Chronos (ancient Greek: Χρόνος) is identified as the Personification of Time. His name in Greek means "time" and is alternatively spelled Chronus (Latin spelling) or Khronos. Chronos is usually portrayed as an old, wise man with a long, gray beard, such as "Father Time". Some English words whose etymological root is khronos/chronos include chronology, chronometer, chronic, anachronism, synchronize, and chronicle.

Time in Kabbalah
According to Kabbalists, "time" is a paradox[41] and an illusion.[42] Both the future and the past are recognized to be combined and simultaneously present.[clarification needed]
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #286 on: 16/10/2022 19:06:42 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 19:04:33
Ancient cultures such as Incan, Mayan, Hopi, and other Native American Tribes – plus the Babylonians, ancient Greeks, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and others – have a concept of a wheel of time: they regard time as cyclical and quantic,[clarification needed] consisting of repeating ages that happen to every being of the Universe between birth and extinction.[36]

In general, the Islamic and Judeo-Christian world-view regards time as linear[37] and directional,[38] beginning with the act of creation by God. The traditional Christian view sees time ending, teleologically,[39] with the eschatological end of the present order of things, the "end time".

In the Old Testament book Ecclesiastes, traditionally ascribed to Solomon (970–928 BC), time (as the Hebrew word עידן, זמן iddan (age, as in "Ice age") zĕman(time) is often translated) was traditionally regarded[by whom?] as a medium for the passage of predestined events.[citation needed] (Another word, زمان" זמן" zamān, meant time fit for an event, and is used as the modern Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew equivalent to the English word "time".)

Time in Greek mythology
The Greek language denotes two distinct principles, Chronos and Kairos. The former refers to numeric, or chronological, time. The latter, literally "the right or opportune moment", relates specifically to metaphysical or Divine time. In theology, Kairos is qualitative, as opposed to quantitative.[40]

In Greek mythology, Chronos (ancient Greek: Χρόνος) is identified as the Personification of Time. His name in Greek means "time" and is alternatively spelled Chronus (Latin spelling) or Khronos. Chronos is usually portrayed as an old, wise man with a long, gray beard, such as "Father Time". Some English words whose etymological root is khronos/chronos include chronology, chronometer, chronic, anachronism, synchronize, and chronicle.

Time in Kabbalah
According to Kabbalists, "time" is a paradox[41] and an illusion.[42] Both the future and the past are recognized to be combined and simultaneously present.[clarification needed]
a universe itself has a beginning and an end. the multiverse splits these into 64 wedges. the megaverse allows 128 universe times in wedged multiverse format. time itself is a perpetual system. made of lower perpetual systems.
nature tricked us into a loop, to allow greater advancement in slower time. When we produce atomic number 121, we should exit said loop. we might even experience some kind of odd or weird feeling from it. that's at most what we should experience.
« Last Edit: 16/10/2022 19:09:01 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #287 on: 16/10/2022 19:10:37 »
think of nature as a woman. if she wants a date with you, she might think to trick you into asking her out, while playing hard to get.
now apply that to understanding nature. perpetual structures. we had to see if another way could work. and it don't. it gets us close but no cigar. no working thoery of everything.
until we change and re-look at things from a different viewpoint and a little more work.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #288 on: 16/10/2022 19:16:01 »
philosophy is thought based science.
Schrodinger's cat is akin to 2n+1. dead=-1, where unknown=0, where alive=1. (-1,0,1) 2 movements, 3 steps.
2n+1
2 movements over 3 steps.
1 movement over 2 steps.
3 movements over 4 steps.
an electron is 1 movement, 1 step.
a proton is 1 movement, 2 steps.
a neutron is 1 movement, 2 steps. (fully discharged)
a neutron is 1 movement, 3 steps. (fully charged)

a proton is 1 movement, 2 steps.
a neutron is 1 movement, 2 steps. (fully discharged)
a neutron is 1 movement, 3 steps. (fully charged)
relates to:

* PXL_20220627_120135182.jpg (2366.25 kB . 4080x3072 - viewed 762 times)

because the way 72 degrees and 108 degrees mirror each other in 180 degrees, or create an x in 360
« Last Edit: 16/10/2022 19:35:36 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #289 on: 16/10/2022 19:23:59 »
Bored chemist. I do value your opinion and right to speak. I just hope you'll focus on asking of questions. You are allowed to ask me if i struggle. any commentary after on its affects on believability is up to each person reading it. you are welcome to say the idea is fool of crap and you can't see it. not to say i'm full of crap because of communication barriers because of something out of my control (autism and mental health issues). I do want to get along. but it takes mutual respect to do so. And I am trying to find my words as i always do. Sometimes its best to let someone who is willing to think, think. less words can be more, if we are willing to work for it. more results and approaches to think about possibilities, instead of ignoring because of probabilities.
and yes, that theorem is part of nature, but does nature truly use it?
or does it no longer apply if we consider a possible charging and discharging system, and where it would be in an atom?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #290 on: 16/10/2022 20:23:27 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:59:10
oh wait, is this evidence that the atom was known about and theorized as far back as 1010? what? impossible you say?
The idea of atoms is a lot older than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus#Atomic_hypothesis
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #291 on: 16/10/2022 20:26:08 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/10/2022 20:23:27
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 18:59:10
oh wait, is this evidence that the atom was known about and theorized as far back as 1010? what? impossible you say?
The idea of atoms is a lot older than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus#Atomic_hypothesis
so what if a cataclysmic event that humanity made, showed us that they possibly existed. sending us on a chase to discover how, while others feared what might happen if we discovered the truth?
the ones in fear, would try to stop them with reason. math. science. control and destruction.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #292 on: 16/10/2022 20:28:45 »
what if the disc of sabu was a perpetual motion piece. of the safer line version. what if ancients made one or many older devices? it could explain how the pyramids were built.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #293 on: 16/10/2022 20:37:40 »
Which pharaoh fought the Sea People?
Ramses III
The Egyptians waged two wars against the Sea Peoples: the first, in the fifth year of King Merneptah (1236–23 bce); the second, in the reign of Ramses III (c. 1198–66 bce).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Peoples
Atlantis?
destroyed by perpetual motion?
what if they were describing flying ships using ionic tech?

* Mediterranean Sea.jpg (957.05 kB, 1774x1504 - viewed 81 times.)
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #294 on: 16/10/2022 20:40:23 »
Democritus
Born   c. 460 BC
Abdera, Thrace
Died   c. 370 BC
The Sea Peoples are a hypothesized seafaring confederation that attacked ancient Egypt and other regions in the East Mediterranean prior to and during the Late Bronze Age collapse (1200–900 BCE).[1][2] Following the creation of the concept in the 19th century, the Sea Peoples' incursions became one of the most famous chapters of Egyptian history, given its connection with, in the words of Wilhelm Max Müller, "the most important questions of ethnography and the primitive history of classic nations".[3][4]
if you look at their page, hieroglyphics of birds.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #295 on: 16/10/2022 20:45:22 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:28:45
what if the disc of sabu
It isn't "real" it's just a sculpture.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #296 on: 16/10/2022 20:46:17 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:28:45
it could explain how the pyramids were built.
We know how they were built.
Lots of people.
No "magic" needed.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #297 on: 16/10/2022 20:48:07 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/10/2022 20:45:22
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:28:45
what if the disc of sabu
It isn't "real" it's just a sculpture.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=114435
papers exist on it.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #298 on: 16/10/2022 20:48:42 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:48:07
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/10/2022 20:45:22
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:28:45
what if the disc of sabu
It isn't "real" it's just a sculpture.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=114435
papers exist on it.
I propose lodestone could have been carved to be held.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodestone
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #299 on: 16/10/2022 20:57:30 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:48:42
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:48:07
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/10/2022 20:45:22
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 16/10/2022 20:28:45
what if the disc of sabu
It isn't "real" it's just a sculpture.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=114435
papers exist on it.
I propose lodestone could have been carved to be held.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lodestone
Emery found the enigmatic Disc on January 10, 1936, while working on the site where the tomb of Prince Sabu, a ruler of the First Dynasty and son of Pharaoh Anejib, was situated. The tomb of Sabu was located in the northern part of Saqqara, at the edge of a plateau. There were seven chambers in his tomb, consisting of animal bones, flint tools, ceramic vessels, ivory products, stone bowls. The prince’s body was in the largest room. The items found at the burial ground did not surprise Emery except one which was shattered in pieces. When the Disc was restored, it became one of the most intrigued ancient artifacts left by Ancient Egyptians.


except one, which was shattered in pieces. they should have taken the pieces as well. they didn't think it could be put back together and put to use. but it existed. it would be porous to allow ionic flow.
good thing the only use we seek is as historical evidence.
why have we never found any more? as a sculpture, why would it be seen as valuable to be taken to the afterlife?
« Last Edit: 16/10/2022 21:01:20 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 23   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: delusion  / pseudoscience 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.582 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.