The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Biblical Flood
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 13   Go Down

Biblical Flood

  • 251 Replies
  • 38190 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2320
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #60 on: 12/01/2023 21:14:51 »
The very title of this thread is totally misleading: the biblical flood fairytale was supposed to have happened ~5500 years ago so how can this be connected with the geology of the planet hundreds or thousands of million years ago?
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #61 on: 12/01/2023 22:10:36 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 12/01/2023 16:39:56
Quote from: Kryptid on 12/01/2023 16:03:14
Is there any particular reason you keep ignoring what I've posted about the gravitational constant not changing detectably over the life time of the Earth?
https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/788709923

For some reason, the video you link there does not have any sound for me so I have no idea what it is talking about. Please summarize it for me and explain how it addresses the gravitational constant evidence.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21160
  • Activity:
    64%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #62 on: 12/01/2023 23:03:15 »
I think Occam's Razor was at its sharpest at Reply #45, which explains everything with minimal assumption.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #63 on: 14/01/2023 09:37:48 »
In my theory geological folds occur before and faults after (or soon before) mud hardens into stone.
« Last Edit: 16/01/2023 12:58:43 by Yaniv »
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #64 on: 14/01/2023 09:52:06 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 14/01/2023 09:37:48
In my theory geological folds occur before and faults after mud hardens into stone.
Have you any evidence for that nonsensical staement?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #65 on: 14/01/2023 11:25:58 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 14/01/2023 09:37:48
In my theory
Why do you keep lying?
Are you a troll?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #66 on: 16/01/2023 12:57:46 »
In my theory volcanic ridges snaking below continents push uplift of mountain ranges.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #67 on: 16/01/2023 13:40:07 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 16/01/2023 12:57:46
In my theory volcanic ridges snaking below continents push uplift of mountain ranges.
It is not a theory. It a a number of nonsensical assertions without any evidence.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #68 on: 16/01/2023 15:18:42 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 16/01/2023 12:57:46
In my theory
Why do you keep doing that?
Why do you keep saying you have a theory when it is clear that you do not?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #69 on: 17/01/2023 14:38:14 »
In the expanding earth theory rift valleys are expansion cracks.
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #70 on: 17/01/2023 14:59:21 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 17/01/2023 14:38:14
In the expanding earth theory rift valleys are expansion cracks.
The expanding earth WAG is completely unevidenced and silly.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #71 on: 17/01/2023 16:28:02 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 17/01/2023 14:38:14
In the expanding earth theory rift valleys are expansion cracks.

Be careful, as you are starting to run afoul of rule #5:

Quote from: another_someone on 25/06/2007 03:00:58
The site is not for evangelising your own pet theory.  It is perfectly acceptable that you should post your own theory up for discussion, but if all you want to do is promote your own idea and are not inviting critical debate about it, then that will not be acceptable.

You keep making statements about your idea without addressing the criticism given by other members. That is starting to look like "evangelizing". If you do not remedy this, we may have to close your thread.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #72 on: 17/01/2023 16:53:54 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 17/01/2023 14:38:14
In the expanding earth theory rift valleys are expansion cracks.
All you are doing now is making yourself look more of a fool by posting this utter nonsense.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #73 on: 17/01/2023 18:03:56 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 17/01/2023 14:38:14
In the expanding earth theory
Quote from: Bored chemist on 16/01/2023 15:18:42
Quote from: Yaniv on 16/01/2023 12:57:46
In my theory
Why do you keep doing that?
Why do you keep saying you have a theory when it is clear that you do not?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #74 on: 18/01/2023 04:16:47 »
The earth accreted, melted, and differentiated, with lighter atoms on the surface and heavier atoms towards the core. Lighter and older continental granite versus heavier and younger oceanic basalt are simpler to comprehend with expansion than plate tectonics.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #75 on: 18/01/2023 07:46:32 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 18/01/2023 04:16:47
The earth accreted, melted, and differentiated, with lighter atoms on the surface and heavier atoms towards the core. Lighter and older continental granite versus heavier and younger oceanic basalt are simpler to comprehend with expansion than plate tectonics.
Repeatedly posting nonsense without responding to member's criticism is just spamming/trolling.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #76 on: 18/01/2023 08:25:53 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 18/01/2023 04:16:47
simpler to comprehend
Your inability to understand science doesn't  make it wrong.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #77 on: 18/01/2023 10:27:44 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/01/2023 14:59:21
The expanding earth WAG is completely unevidenced and silly.
I am reminded of Father George Lemaitre arguing for an expanding universe in a static universe mind frame.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #78 on: 18/01/2023 12:47:14 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 18/01/2023 10:27:44
Quote from: Origin on 17/01/2023 14:59:21
The expanding earth WAG is completely unevidenced and silly.
I am reminded of Father George Lemaitre arguing for an expanding universe in a static universe mind frame.
He had evidence.
You do not.

Do you understand the difference?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #79 on: 18/01/2023 16:15:56 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 12/01/2023 22:10:36
For some reason, the video you link there does not have any sound for me so I have no idea what it is talking about. Please summarize it for me and explain how it addresses the gravitational constant evidence.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.404 seconds with 71 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.