[Bored chemist]

Glaser paper is below.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172c

I looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'

The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.

You seem to have forgotten that you already lost this argument
The evidence is collected every day.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.msg537466#msg537466

[Yaniv (OP)]

Glaser paper is below.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172c

I looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'

The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.

You seem to have forgotten that you already lost this argument
The evidence is collected every day.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.msg537466#msg537466

I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.

[Origin]

I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.

So since you have changed the topic I assume you have given up on your biblical flood idea?

[Yaniv (OP)]

I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.

So since you have changed the topic I assume you have given up on your biblical flood idea?

Nope, we are still flooded in sh1t and I am waiting for an opening to walk into the third temple in Jerusalem.

[Origin]

Nope, we are still flooded in sh1t and I am waiting for an opening to walk into the third temple in Jerusalem.

The biblical flood was not water; it was a flood of feces?  What does a temple in Jerusalem have to do with anything?  Are you talking about science or religion?

[Yaniv (OP)]

Nope, we are still flooded in sh1t and I am waiting for an opening to walk into the third temple in Jerusalem.

The biblical flood was not water; it was a flood of feces?  What does a temple in Jerusalem have to do with anything?  Are you talking about science or religion?

I am talking of a place where science and religions meet above the lowlier world of matter.

[Origin]

I am talking of a place where science and religions meet above the lowlier world of matter.

Where is this place you are referring to?

[Yaniv (OP)]

I am talking of a place where science and religions meet above the lowlier world of matter.

Where is this place you are referring to?

The Third Temple in Jerusalem.

[Origin]

The Third Temple in Jerusalem.

So are you saying that scientific experiments will agree with religion in the third temple in Jerusalem?  If so then we should run those experiments.  Where is the third temple in Jerusalem?

[Kryptid]

I expect a linear relationship between heat absorbed and weight loss. Doubling the calories absorbed should double the weight loss.

If that's the case, then that would mean that the metal would lose all of its weight if it absorbed 200,000 times as many calories as in the experiment you mentioned (because a weight loss of 100 micrograms multiplied by 200,000 equals 20 grams, the weight of the metal sample). Right?

[Yaniv (OP)]

The Third Temple in Jerusalem.

So are you saying that scientific experiments will agree with religion in the third temple in Jerusalem?  If so then we should run those experiments.  Where is the third temple in Jerusalem?

No. The third temple has not been built yet. Don't let this side chat of us distract ourselves from concluding the experiment.

[The Spoon]

The Third Temple in Jerusalem.

So are you saying that scientific experiments will agree with religion in the third temple in Jerusalem?  If so then we should run those experiments.  Where is the third temple in Jerusalem?

No. The third temple has not been built yet. Don't let this side chat of us distract ourselves from concluding the experiment.

Give it is barking mad nonsense with religious overtones, it is entirely pertinent.

[The Spoon]

Glaser paper is below.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172c

I looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'

The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.

So the paper you refer to in support of what you laughably refer to as a theory has no validity? 

[Bored chemist]

I am talking of a place where science and religions meet

They don't meet.
One values evidence over dogma; the other values dogma over evidence.

Glaser paper is below.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172c

I looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'

The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.

You seem to have forgotten that you already lost this argument
The evidence is collected every day.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.msg537466#msg537466

I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.

But you would bet that the sky fairy is real, so we shouldn't trust your opinions, should we?

[Yaniv (OP)]

I expect a linear relationship between heat absorbed and weight loss. Doubling the calories absorbed should double the weight loss.

If that's the case, then that would mean that the metal would lose all of its weight if it absorbed 200,000 times as many calories as in the experiment you mentioned (because a weight loss of 100 micrograms multiplied by 200,000 equals 20 grams, the weight of the metal sample). Right?

Wrong. The metal should vaporize long before.

[Kryptid]

A vaporized metal is still a gas. If we have that gas in a container, will it lose all of its weight?

[Origin]

The third temple has not been built yet.

You can see the future? 

[Yaniv (OP)]

A vaporized metal is still a gas. If we have that gas in a container, will it lose all of its weight?

No, because gas atoms can hold a finite number of heat particles and heat particles repel each other and will escape the container.

[Yaniv (OP)]

The third temple has not been built yet.

You can see the future? 

No. I can't tell the future. The future of civilization has not been determined yet. Actions at present determine the future. The results of the experiment could provide me the keys to the temple.

[Kryptid]

A vaporized metal is still a gas. If we have that gas in a container, will it lose all of its weight?

No, because gas atoms can hold a finite number of heat particles and heat particles repel each other and will escape the container.

Given that gases can reach millions or billions of degrees in the cores of stars and supernova, that sample of gas with merely 200,000 times the energy of the original metal is nowhere remotely close to the limit of how much heat a gas can hold.