[Bored chemist]

So when they use fluorocarbons in air conditioning, and they put pressure on the gas turning it into a hot liquid, this is not an example of pressure creating heat?

That's correct. It isn't pressure creating heat.
The heat is released because the molecules are, in effect, "sticky".
It's called latent heat of vapourisation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_vaporization

That's true though if you guys are so smart why aren't you ahead? seriously.

Ahead of what?
As I just pointed out in my last two posts here, you do not seem to know what you are talking about.
So, at least we are ahead of you.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Ahead of what?
As I just pointed out in my last two posts here, you do not seem to know what you are talking about.
So, at least we are ahead of you.

How again is gravity created according to your whatever it is you rely on for 'truth'?

[Bored chemist]

How again is gravity created according to your whatever it is you rely on for 'truth'?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity#Einstein_field_equations

[Kryptid]

So you honestly believe the core is slowly producing heat through radioactive decay and then slowly releasing it through the crust.

Yes.

In the meantime the radiating heat is just sitting in the core waiting to be released through what? a volcano?

It isn't "radiating heat", it's just "heat". And the heat isn't released only through volcanoes. It's also released through conduction. At least some of the warmth of the crust comes from internal heating.

Tell me what object can you heat up to molten temperatures in the center, and still be able to hold it because 90% of it is 'blanketing' the molten center making its shell room temperature?

The Earth, because that's how it is.

No such material exists.

Clearly it does, given that's how the Earth works.

What I said earlier about the first law of thermodynamics is true. Take the core out of the Earth and the heat inside of it cannot spontaneously disappear. That heat represents a form of energy. Energy cannot be destroyed. It will remain there until it is radiated away. A ball of metal at thousands of degrees glows and radiates heat.

Dinosaurs.

And that has what to do with any of this?

seriously. you are much like chatGPT spitting out wiki answers. Is that smart?

It is if the answers are correct.

Am I seriously taking you guys serious anymore?

If not, you're free to leave. Keep up the snarky attitude and we'll help you with that.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Well since you guys are so gun ho on evidence, perhaps this little experiment... Put weight pressure on six sides of a hexagon that squeezes a core, see if it heats up. Could be free energy from gravity if you put enough pressure on each side you could boil water with the core, then the core would magically re absorb heat from the atmosphere.

[Bored chemist]

weight pressure

What did you think that meant?
Weight and pressure are not the same thing; they have different units.

Could be free energy from gravity

No; it can't.
Try to avoid such silly ideas.

if you put enough pressure on each side you could boil water

High pressure makes it harder to boil things.

Am I seriously taking you guys serious anymore?

It doesn't look like it.
You seem to be deliberately posting stuff that would embarrass a teenager in a science class.

[Kryptid]

Well since you guys are so gun ho on evidence, perhaps this little experiment... Put weight pressure on six sides of a hexagon that squeezes a core, see if it heats up. Could be free energy from gravity if you put enough pressure on each side you could boil water with the core, then the core would magically re absorb heat from the atmosphere.

That wouldn't be free energy.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

It has to be retraction of a core atoms gravity field that causes the earth's gravity field, if it was retraction of the electromagnetic shell then it would cause a magnetic field.

[Kryptid]

It has to be retraction of a core atoms gravity field that causes the earth's gravity field

What does it mean for a gravity field to retract?

And it still wouldn't be free energy. Noether's theorem demonstrates this.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Also you might get some statistics from building 6,7,8 sided blocks and using the pressure experiment, find out how much pressure and temperature can build up in the center. The difference between each block might be a clue for other characteristics.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

What does it mean for a gravity field to retract?

The gravity field of the nucleus can't convert it's gravitational pull into movement so the field retracts on itself. Might be a clue into molecular formation. So overlapping gravity fields don't cause them to retract but pulls the two objects together, then because of the shell repulsion, the pull of gravity is converted into retraction of the gravity field's like two knots pulling on each other making them tighter.

[Kryptid]

The gravity field of the nucleus can't convert it's gravitational pull into movement

Yes it can. Forces are good at doing that.

so the field retracts on itself.

I asked you what it means for a gravitational field to retract and you answer by saying that it retracts. That doesn't help me understand what you mean.

Might be a clue into molecular formation.

The gravitational pull between two atoms is practically nonexistent. The electromagnetic force is responsible for molecule formation.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

I asked you what it means for a gravitational field to retract and you answer by saying that it retracts. That doesn't help me understand what you mean.

Ok Ok, Lets say your nucleus has a temperature of 10 from pressure heat, a gravity field that tapers off from 10 to 1, and the surrounding space which is 1. If you raise the temperature of space to 2, what happens to the gravity field? It's edge that is touching space will become as dense and hot as the surrounding space, this will send density and temperature backwards into the nucleus. So when you pack all the atom's tight and there gravity fields overlap, this is what happens the temperature of space increases between the atom's.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

When an object falls into a gravity field like earth's the outer edge of the object's gravity field 'sheds' or retracts its layers as it enters the earth's gravity field and it falls lets say 100 feet per mm of the object's gravity field retraction. How much is the earth's mass and the object's?

Actually a smarter equation to find the mass of earth might involve going up in space and statistics from two known masses like metal sphere's and how long it takes for them to come together travelling x distance. Then use those variables to calculate the mass of earth. I saw a video way back when of just this type of thing in space but haven't found it since.

[Bored chemist]

Lets say your nucleus has a temperature of 10 from pressure heat,

It doesn't. So let's not say that.

[Kryptid]

Ok Ok, Lets say your nucleus has a temperature of 10 from pressure heat

Given that an atomic nucleus in its ground state does not produce radiation, it's a rather dubious idea that it has a temperature at all (and no, there is no difference between "pressure heat" and "radiating heat").

a gravity field that tapers off from 10 to 1, and the surrounding space which is 1.

Gravitational fields and empty space don't have temperatures.

If you raise the temperature of space to 2, what happens to the gravity field?

You can't raise the temperature of empty space.

It's edge that is touching space will become as dense and hot as the surrounding space

First of all, gravitational fields don't have an edge: they extend infinitely. Second of all, gravitational fields don't have a density or a temperature.

this will send density and temperature backwards into the nucleus.

I can't make sense of this.

So when you pack all the atom's tight and there gravity fields overlap,

All gravitational fields already overlap whether the atoms are close or not. This is because gravity is a force that follows the inverse square law and never goes to zero strength with distance.

this is what happens the temperature of space increases between the atom's.

No it doesn't, because space doesn't have a temperature.

When an object falls into a gravity field like earth's the outer edge of the object's gravity field

Gravitational fields don't have an edge.

the outer edge of the object's gravity field 'sheds' or retracts its layers as it enters the earth's gravity field

I'm not sure what this means but I'm pretty sure there's no evidence for it.

[Bored chemist]

I saw a video way back when of just this type of thing in space but haven't found it since.

Good.
Any such video should have been deleted.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

How again is gravity created according to your whatever it is you rely on for 'truth'?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity#Einstein_field_equations

Is this video an analogy of what you believe?

[Kryptid]

Is this video an analogy of what you believe?

"Analogy" being the operative word here.

[Bored chemist]

Is this video an analogy of what you believe?

Anything that mimics gravity is an analogy to how I think gravity works.
So what?