[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

he said one system is aloud.

I don't think you understood me. Perpetual motion that doesn't create energy is allowed because it doesn't violate conservation of energy and therefore doesn't violate Noether's theorem.

and the mindset, is that it is proven.

It is.

its proven in instances tried.

That's the great thing about proofs in math: it's proven to be true in all circumstances already. You don't think that the Pythagorean theorem was proven by testing every possible number in the equation, do you? That would be impossible, since there are an infinite number of numbers. So we know for a mathematical certainty that conservation of energy holds in all circumstances where time symmetry also holds. If you want to beat conservation of energy, you also need to beat time symmetry.

This happens in the real world due to the metric expansion of space. This causes radiation in the universe to be redshifted, reducing the energy content of each photon. The energy doesn't actually go anywhere, it's just plain gone. This is allowed because time symmetry is violated: space now is not the same as space later (it's bigger). So that's a real life occasion where time symmetry is violated and thus Noether's theorem doesn't hold.

and what i'm prosing requires time as well. set by the flip ghost particle, and sets in motion new thoughts on science, and possibly, more accurate time measures. its based in multiverse theory as well, using 4 layers of multiverse as the upper end.
we use n/1 as electron, n/2 as proton, n/3 for neutron. time is n=0 to n=1.
one time with 3 rates of generation.
the rates would be described as n/1, n/2, n/3. if time is one.
notice, time is set to the same as the electron. 1/1=1.
 so if time is not perpetual, what is it?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm out.

stay safe, and have an amazing day mr cotter.
thank you for letting us know.

[Kryptid]

and what i'm prosing requires time as well

What you need is a violation of time symmetry, not merely time itself.

so if time is not perpetual, what is it?

Time being perpetual doesn't represent a violation of conservation of energy, so I'm not sure of the relevance here.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n
or
time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
or
time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n
or
time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
because 2^n=1/2^-n via 2n+1.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n
or
time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
or
time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n
or
time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
because 2^n=1/2^-n via 2n+1.

2^n+((1/2)(2^n))

it sets our magnet number.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

and what i'm prosing requires time as well

What you need is a violation of time symmetry, not merely time itself.

so if time is not perpetual, what is it?

Time being perpetual doesn't represent a violation of conservation of energy, so I'm not sure of the relevance here.

time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n

time=(a*distance)*(b*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n


time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^n if b=½^n

time=(b*distance)*(a*speed) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
2^n=½^-n

2^n+((1/2)(2^n)) where n=diameter of the sphere to attach points to (magnets)

so explain the effects of having distance halved in a system that is created using equilateral pressures.
atoms cannot do this. we can.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Magnetic force

Magnetic lines of force of a bar magnet shown by iron filings on paper
Detecting magnetic field with compass and with iron filings
Main article: Magnetic field
The phenomenon of magnetism is "mediated" by the magnetic field. An electric current or magnetic dipole creates a magnetic field, and that field, in turn, imparts magnetic forces on other particles that are in the fields.

Maxwell's equations, which simplify to the Biot–Savart law in the case of steady currents, describe the origin and behavior of the fields that govern these forces. Therefore, magnetism is seen whenever electrically charged particles are in motion—for example, from movement of electrons in an electric current, or in certain cases from the orbital motion of electrons around an atom's nucleus. They also arise from "intrinsic" magnetic dipoles arising from quantum-mechanical spin.

The same situations that create magnetic fields—charge moving in a current or in an atom, and intrinsic magnetic dipoles—are also the situations in which a magnetic field has an effect, creating a force. Following is the formula for moving charge; for the forces on an intrinsic dipole, see magnetic dipole.

When a charged particle moves through a magnetic field B, it feels a Lorentz force F given by the cross product:[19]

{\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q(\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} )}\mathbf{F} = q (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B})
where

{\displaystyle q}q is the electric charge of the particle, and
v is the velocity vector of the particle
Because this is a cross product, the force is perpendicular to both the motion of the particle and the magnetic field. It follows that the magnetic force does no work on the particle; it may change the direction of the particle's movement, but it cannot cause it to speed up or slow down. The magnitude of the force is

{\displaystyle F=qvB\sin \theta \,}F=qvB\sin\theta\,
where {\displaystyle \theta }\theta  is the angle between v and B.

One tool for determining the direction of the velocity vector of a moving charge, the magnetic field, and the force exerted is labeling the index finger "V"[dubious – discuss], the middle finger "B", and the thumb "F" with your right hand. When making a gun-like configuration, with the middle finger crossing under the index finger, the fingers represent the velocity vector, magnetic field vector, and force vector, respectively. See also right-hand rule.

so how is harnessing the motion impossible, since we have force from inside. this does not break symmetry laws.
its self-powered with internal force mechanisms. if we were to employ electromagnets as well, we could up the power considerably. due to electromagnetic force (4 forces) 8n vs 8n+1 loses two steps.

Time=t
d=distance
s=speed
t=(a*d)*(b*s) where a=2^n if b=½^n
t=(a*d)*(b*s) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
t=(b*d)*(a*s) where a=2^n if b=½^n
t=(b*d)*(a*s) where a=2^-n if b=½^-n
2^n=½^-n

2n vs 2n+1 as well.

2^n+((1/2)(2^n)) where n=diameter of the sphere to attach points to (magnets @ each point)
1/2n vs 1/2n+1 as 1/2y vs 1/2z+1 (2 steps vs 2 steps)
2n vs 2n+1 as 2a vs 2b+1 (2 steps vs 2 steps)
4n vs 4n+1 as 4c vs 4d+1 (4 steps vs 4 steps)
8n vs 8n+1 as 8e vs 8f+1 (8 steps vs 6 steps) (-2 steps)
16n vs 16n+1 as 16g vs 16h+1 (8 steps vs 12 steps) (+4 steps)
32n vs 32n+1 as 32i vs 32j+1 (32 steps vs 32 steps)
using -0.5,......,0.5 to find result via n
 
step would be n going from 1 to 2
quantity of stops available
steps/ quantity of stops available in steps
2n/2n+1 when n≥1 and whole number
2 steps/ 3 quantity of stops available in steps.
4 steps/ 5 quantity of stops available in steps.
6 steps/ 7 quantity of stops available in steps.
8 steps/ 9 quantity of stops available in steps.
12 steps/ 13 quantity of stops available in steps.
32 steps/ 33quantity of stops available in steps.
 
½^n=2^-n via 2 steps (including zero step)
n=(-1,0,1)
½^n=(2,0,½)
2^n=(½,0,2)
 
1/2y=-0.25 where y=-0.5
1/2y=0
1/2y=0.25 where y=0.5
Y uses 2 steps
 
1/2z+1=0.75 where z=-0.5
1/2z+1=1 where z=0
1/2z+1=1.25 where z=0.5
Z uses 2 steps
 
2a=-1 where a=-0.5
2a=0 where a=0
2a=1 where a=0.5
A uses 2 steps
 
 
2b+1=0 where b=-0.5
2b+1=1 where b=0
2b+1=2 where b=0.5
B uses 2 steps
 
 
4c=-2 where c=-0.5
4c=-1 where c=-0.25
4c=0 where c=0
4c=1 where c=0.25
4c=2 where c=0.5
C uses 4 steps
 
 
4d+1=-1 where d=-0.5
4d+1=0 where d=-0.25
4d+1=1 where d=0
4d+1=2 where d=0.25
4d+1=3 where d=0.5
D uses 4 steps
 
 
8e=-4 where e=-0.5
8e=-3 where e=-0.375
8e=-2 where e=0.25
8e=-1 where e=-0.125
8e=0 where e=0
8e=1 where e=0.125
8e=2 where e=0.25
8e=3 where e=0.375
8e=4 where e=0.5
E uses 8 steps
 
 
8f+1=-1 where f=-0.5
8f+1=0 where f=-0.125
8f+1=1 where f=0
8f+1=2 where f=0.125
8f+1=3 where f=0.25
8f+1=4 where f=0.375
8f+1=5 where f=0.5
F uses 6 steps
 
16g=-4 where g=0.5
16g=-3 where g=-0.1875
16g=-2 where g=-0.25
16g=-1 where g=-0.0625
16g=0 where g=0
16g=1 where g=0.0625
16g=2 where g=0.25
16g=3 where g=0.1875
16g=4 where g=0.5
G uses 8 steps
 
 
16h+1=-3 where h=-0.5
16h+1=-2 where h=-0.1875
16h+1=-1 where h=-0.125
16h+1=0 where h=-0.0625
16h+1=1 where h=0
16h+1=2 where g=0.03125
16h+1=3 where h=0.0125
16h+1=4 where h=0.1875
16h+1=5 where h=0.25
16h+1=6 where h=0.3125
16h+1=7 where h=0.375
16h+1=8 where h=0.4375
16h+1=9 where h=0.5
H uses 12 steps

in essence we would be changing the magnetic force into electrical force, but also using it to increase speed, by lowing distance. it can be harnessed. Now, for safety, can i get some help.
we start with how far magnets have to be to start movement. using a+b=c+b, where b=1, we decrease our b, or distance between spheres, to create more pressure, more power. we set distance through equilibrium, to also equalize pressure. it uses magnetic torque in equal directions. but the caging system creates spin.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

The issue I'm working on
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/universe-expansion-rate-mystery?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn_feed

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

delusional pseudoscience. tagged by people who don't realize that in internal force mechanism has zero relevance to symmetry laws, as they are force and torque released over time.

My work involves searching for tesseracts.

I just don't limit the time frame. See a tesseract is a 4d dimensional object. in a 3d environment, 4d is a double existent state in 3d. meaning, movement. Atoms have a perpetuality system that releases sound. excess energy. It times said sound. More than likely it's reduced at the time electricity flows through the atoms surrounding area.

the smallest 4d space that we have, is in an atom. it exists between the neutron and proton.

Pillars of creation are bascially, in affect, the universe's space neutron.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

https://www.geogebra.org/m/rw9jzhcx (past present future, or observed time with circle)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/kcda4cae (simple infinity)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/qwvccgcz (dueterium)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/yc8thvwk (helium)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/fqrrmuvw (2+2=5 visualized through 2n+2n=5 where n=1.25)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/ejpfww58 (matter to anttimatter fractal progression, or opposite cone fractal progression)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/gnjuskjm (torus dual timing, spindle=electron, donut=proton, both=neutron)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/mcwwbtrq (expansion of circles via 1/3)
https://www.geogebra.org/m/mrzwy6tw (flower of life)
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/m1dsmrj02e (collatz proven by unphasing then comparison)
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ubcpf48a3u (varied adjustment of 1-2^n)
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/rxqs6t2sbf (mandelbrot grid for sin and cos comparisons)
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yvu86vkwz0 (Gabriels horn via electromagnetic spring principle)
all positive spectrum is allowed by:

[Origin]

I agree with the tags, "delusional", "pseudoscience".

[Bored chemist]

do we understand physics the same as 500 years ago?

A bit more recently than that we proved that PM is impossible.
Were you not aware of that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem

[Bored chemist]

you expect to be heard while you shout that i'm speaking nonsense

I haven't shouted, I have cited evidence.
Do you grasp the difference?