[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Another confirmation of the Dark Flow:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/06/the-dark-flow-the-existence-of-other-universes-new-claims-of-hard-evidence.html#more

[BlueHorizon]

Time is of the essence


One thing is sure, time is eternal...

CPT AA what extactly is meant by this in scientific discussion?
(1) Time has no end?
(2) Time had no beginning?
(3) Both the above?

Given some understandings of the concept of "time" ... to say "time had a beginning" is a logical contradiction.
That isn't the same as saying the actual reality (as opposed to the concept of it) is eternal.

Is it ever correct to say "there was a time when there was no time"?

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Energy is conserved. We are made of energy. Everything you can feel is made out of energy. If energy is made out of time, time must be eternal. You can't stop motion, you can't stop time. Therefore there was no beginning and there will be no end...

A black ring has a time relation to other black rings. A photon experiences time in a 2-dimensional world (maybe it has a fixed thickness in the direction of motion).

There is still the possibility that we live in a simulated world which had a beginning, but then, there is necessarily an underworld without a beginning. There can't be an infinite sequence of simulations inside simulations, because a simulation has necessarily a beginning...

But maybe, only maybe, the real question is : who wants to live forever...?

I do...

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

The fear of death and its link to evolution. Is it accidental or not? That was my question... )

Soon I will post my calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron as an attached pdf. It won't be my final version but people who understand my theory will decode it easily. At last, I have the perfect prediction...

Important articles by Lee Smolin and Marina Cortês related to my theory:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.6167
http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2206

Holographic principle necessary?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1977

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts."   Feynman (1968)

first read this
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/sethna/Cracks/QED.html

My calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron and the neutrino mass is in attached secured pdf file.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

http://phys.org/news/2013-09-bizarre-alignment-planetary-nebulae.html

The nearer a star is from our galaxy supermassive black ring, the more aligned to the plane its orbit must be in order to be stable. It is a matter of history...

How many strikes I need to convince you?

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-physics-classical-quantum-world.html

http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3708

There is no truly isolated system. All particles of the universe are entangled with each other. Fifty percent of level of entanglement between two particles is sufficient to know at 100% certitude that if you define one as having a spin up, the other has a spin down... If the first particle has a spin at zero degree, the other will have a spin between 90 and 270 degrees. It always has a non zero component at 180 degrees. In fact, its maximum probability level is at 180 degrees, if you consider the outside system (the rest of the universe) as having a circular probability function (spherical in 3D) for its contribution to the spin of the particle.

[jeffreyH]

Euclidean Space and Relativity

In my opinion, we are in an Euclidean space, but as we are made of light (all matter and energy), we cannot perceive a speed higher than the speed of light. So the Newtonian Doppler shift of the frequency becomes relativistic... Timerate really slows down with acceleration and increase of gravity. The length perception contracts because of the variation of timerate and frequency. There is no black holes but there is black rings. I would bet anything on it... Mass, gravity and time are strongly related.

As no mass can exceed light speed then it seems sensible to assume that no mass can collapse inside its own Schwarzschild radius as that would preclude emission of photons. It may approach the event horizon but never actually compress itself beyond that limit. As time dilation is highly accentuated at this surface electromagnetic waves would be emitted at a greatly reduced rate and a frequency too low to detect. This stretched waveform could be the driver of the expansion of the universe. The 'black hole' would eventually evaporate but over cosmic timescales.

As every action has an equal and opposite reaction the expansion is a reaction to the compression of the collapsing mass. Time dilation and its effects could describe the rotation of galaxies.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

I invite you to read my theory entirely, keeping only the latest conclusions. You should click on my pseudo name "cpt arkangel" and read the other latest comments I have made which are not included in my theory.

Space is not Euclidean. Space is a relation from each elementary particle to all other particles of the universe. There is a set of flat spaces evolving through time. From Earth, if you look at the universe, measure the CMB radiation and you subtract Earth relative motion from it, you get a flat space, taking account that the measurement is instantaneous-like compared to cosmological time and motion. So you are left with an elementary particle measuring the geometry of space at a specific time.

General Relativity is not a complete theory and it is flawed at the level of particles (read other of my posts to find the proofs, some are outside my theory). There is no point particles and the concept of spacetime introduced by GR is wrong. GR was made long time before entanglement was sufficiently understood.

Concerning black holes, even if I use the term "event horizon", there is no event horizon as understood in the "standard models".

The expansion is due to the release of the longitudinal component of photons at the big bang from our black ring of origin. How it happened will be the next big mystery to solve and it will explain the mass of the elementary particles. If there are different possible starting conditions, there is a different possible set of particles to each big bang.

A black ring does not evaporate in any way, it is the lowest form of entropy. The solution is simple. The expansion energy, which is 50% of the total of the original energy, never go back to its origin but it is lost due to the geometry of the rings and it produces gamma ray bursts when a sufficient quantity of matter is absorbed in a relatively short amount of time.

Another mystery is how kinetic energy could be caught again in a larger universe... maybe it transforms in neutrinos... the lightest particle... Neutrinos=dark matter...

[petm1]

Why not think of each photon as a monopole? 

[Pmb]

Why not think of each photon as a monopole? 

Why would anybody do that? It'd be like asking "Why not thinkg of each photon as a cow?" Sure. If you tossed everything you knew about physics out the window and put on your lying hat you might convince yourself to say such a thing. But you'd have to be drunk enough to come up with a motive for actually wanting to do such a thing.

They're unrelated entities. Why do you ask these questions? A photon is nothing like a monopole and there's nothing in physics to suggest it. So where on earth did you get the idea to ask such a thing?

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Yes, you can see it as a monopole, but certainly not a magnetic monopole and it is conflicting with the relativistic point of view of one particle. It is interesting but I don't see its usefulness right now. By the principle of reciprocality, you can see it as an inertial monopole.

Photons have mass?
http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html

[Pmb]

Yes, you can see it as a monopole, ....

The term "monopole" when used without further clarification it's usually assumed to mean "magnetic monopole". Simply do a search on google to see that. But in no way can a photon be thought of as an electric dipole.

With responses like this I can't accept your claim that you studied physics in college.
You certainly can not. If you believe otherwise then please post a proof rather than just make the claim.

Photons have mass?
http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html

No. Read it again. This time more slowly, i.e.

...act as though they have mass ...

[Pmb]

there is no point of arguing with you because you are too stubborn Pete.

If there's no point of arguing then don't. Being very stubborn is a good way for a physicist such as myself to be. It helps us not buy into whatever someone wants us to believe just because they say so or think something.

What is an "my interrogation mark" and why would I see it?

So, that's JP and myself down now. Whoelse?

[Pmb]

question mark "?"

No wonder why you got kicked out of the physics forum...

It is just like you always want to shoot someone. You won't shoot me for sure, I will not answer any of your questions anymore and don't ask me why!!!

I don't deserve this. I did not attack you in any way.

Wow! I'm amazed at how paranoid you are and how much you've read into things that aren't there. You wrote "Haven't you seen my interrogation mark?" and I wanted to know what that meant - Period.

When someone writes No wonder why you got kicked out of the physics forum... it's (1) very insulting and (2) tells me that you were waiting/looking for a reason to assume its true. I was told to leave because they don't like it when people disagree with them and they can't force their beliefs on others.

You've turned vile in a very short time span so you're going into my kill file for being so cruel.

[jeffreyH]

question mark "?"

No wonder why you got kicked out of the physics forum...

It is just like you always want to shoot someone. You won't shoot me for sure, I will not answer any of your questions anymore and don't ask me why!!!

I don't deserve this. I did not attack you in any way.

Wow! I'm amazed at how paranoid you are and how much you've read into things that aren't there. You wrote "Haven't you seen my interrogation mark?" and I wanted to know what that meant - Period.

When someone writes No wonder why you got kicked out of the physics forum... it's (1) very insulting and (2) tells me that you were waiting/looking for a reason to assume its true. I was told to leave because they don't like it when people disagree with them and they can't force their beliefs on others.

You've turned vile in a very short time span so you're going into my kill file for being so cruel.

Which physics forum was it? I found one that was very hostile to debate and wonder if it was the same one.

[CliffordK]

Somehow I think this topic has gotten a bit off topic.
Can you please get back to a discussion of photons?

[jeffreyH]

The photon as the only elementary particle would have to also play a role in the Higgs Boson and so be involved in mass in some way. This is self referencing like pulling yourself up by your own bootstrap. Also the Graviton is shown to have spin 2 and mirrors the photon somewhat mathematically. The expression of gravity would have to come out of the photon. How is that possible?

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

In my theory, the photon has a transverse gravitational mass and a longitudinal inertial mass. The graviton is a hypothetical particle, but it could be made of 2 photons' transverse component, because any interaction must obey the principle of reciprocality. Yes, the Higgs boson is made from 2 photons, probably a total of spin 0, which conveys inertia, the longitudinal component, for some specifically quantized interactions. Yes, it is a very interesting idea. Thanks!



http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

I think it is probably right to say that gravity is mediated at the speed of light.

If non locality of entanglement is here to stay, it is obvious to me that to conserve causality, space is the end product, space is the result of any interaction. The world may be a hologram. Space is just the spatial dimensions and it is the end product of the causality chain.

But what is more interesting is if spacetime is quantized and localized into energy quanta represented by particles, it means that the limit imposed on the speed of light necessitates a limit on the minimal delay in time (space is the end product therefore you need a limit on time!).

There is no gravitational wave...