0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Is the hypothesis of climate change what you are referring to as geoengineering?
So what are you trying to say?
You have to make allowances for tkadm30's inability to understand evidence.He believes essentially anything he sees on crackpot websites.Check his other threads on the subject.
Friday, Aug 25th, 2017: Looking at the SSEC Watervapor map on a 28 hour loop, we see that hurricane Harvey was being targeted with microwave RF sufficient to temporarily destroy the eyewall’s organization at two separate times in this loop as the storm advanced in a Northeast path toward Texas. In the previous two videos we show the distinct markings of the microwave transmitter targeting Harvey, superheating various areas near its center which generate pressure waves and ‘blast’ patterns while disrupting the convective process in the storm.
Anything injected into the upper atmosphere by any means, will be about 5000 miles to the east in 24 hours.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/08/2017 21:23:10You have to make allowances for tkadm30's inability to understand evidence.He believes essentially anything he sees on crackpot websites.Check his other threads on the subject.Thanks for not even attempting to answer my initial question. Your systematic denial of independent research is probably the reason you miss the point. Please stop the emotional ranting and confront me with reasonable arguments. Otherwise, we have no reason to believe in your nonsense.
Quote from: alancalverd on 30/08/2017 10:03:54Anything injected into the upper atmosphere by any means, will be about 5000 miles to the east in 24 hours. We are talking about satellite-controlled microwave radiation here.
"Bizarre Radar Anomaly Over Corpus Christi Texas 2 Days Before Harvey Landfall Indicates Mass Weather Modification Took Place."QuoteFriday, Aug 25th, 2017: Looking at the SSEC Watervapor map on a 28 hour loop, we see that hurricane Harvey was being targeted with microwave RF sufficient to temporarily destroy the eyewall’s organization at two separate times in this loop as the storm advanced in a Northeast path toward Texas. In the previous two videos we show the distinct markings of the microwave transmitter targeting Harvey, superheating various areas near its center which generate pressure waves and ‘blast’ patterns while disrupting the convective process in the storm.https://chemtrailsplanet.net/2017/08/26/weather-terrorists-engineer-hurricane-harvey-for-maximum-destruction/amp/http://allnewspipeline.com/Hurricane_Harvey_Weather_Modification_Evidence.phphttp://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/harvey-steered-texas-coast-microwave-burst-haarp/206437https://geopolitics.co/2014/02/04/u-s-attacked-philippines-using-haarp/
What verifiable evidence do you have that the radar anomaly was caused specifically by man-made microwave beams? Please don't say, "we have no other explanation for it, therefore it had to be man-made microwave beams", because that would be the argument from ignorance fallacy. Fallacies prove nothing. How about giving us some verifiable evidence that these weather modification satellites exist in the first place?I'm not asking for some reference to a vague program from the past for which we have no confirmation that it ever reached the scale you propose. I'm asking for unambiguous evidence that these satellites exist now and have the ability to control hurricanes. I'm asking for evidence that is verifiable and does not invoke any kind of fallacious logic. I have yet to see you provide this kind of evidence.
Do you have any idea what are the capacities of the HAARP system?HAARP technology is fully functioning and capable of altering atmospheric storms, including hurricanes. See: http://www.google.com/patents/US4686605
The energy available to HAARP is far too small to conceivably have any important effect on something like a hurricane. The facility can produce a radio signal with 3.6 million watts of power, whereas the average hurricane releases around 600 trillion watts of heat energy: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/hurricane-power.html. That means HAARP has only 0.0000006% of the power output of an average hurricane (making the hurricane 167 million times more powerful). That's like comparing the power output of a candle to that of some power plants.
Geometric ModulationInstead of modulating the power of the HF array, and thus not using it at its maximum power, geometric modulation relies on leaving the array on, but moving the beam across the sky at the ELF frequency. Figure 2 shows some examples where the beam can sweep a line or circle in the sky. Each portion of the ionosphere is effectively being heated at the ELF frequency. The heated area is larger which results in larger overall ELF power, and there is phasing between each heated region, which can impart some directionality to the radiated ELF (Cohen et al., 2008; Cohen et al., 2010).