The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Down

Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)

  • 124 Replies
  • 17725 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« on: 28/08/2017 22:02:50 »
The possibility that geoengineering caused Hurricane Harvey must not be underestimated.
« Last Edit: 12/09/2017 21:18:25 by chiralSPO »
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Offline mrsmith2211

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #1 on: 29/08/2017 00:22:44 »
Is the hypothesis of climate change what you are referring to as geoengineering?
Logged
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #2 on: 29/08/2017 00:30:56 »
Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 29/08/2017 00:22:44
Is the hypothesis of climate change what you are referring to as geoengineering?

"Climate change" is a political fraud fabricated to justify the weaponization of weather modification technology known as geoengineering.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Offline mrsmith2211

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #3 on: 29/08/2017 00:59:31 »
So what are you trying to say?
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #4 on: 29/08/2017 10:19:50 »
I think the poster is trying to say that ignorance is the mother of invention.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 
The following users thanked this post: tkadm30



Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #5 on: 29/08/2017 10:47:25 »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30197085
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Online alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11472
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 687 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #6 on: 29/08/2017 12:33:54 »
The damage done by modern hurricanes is the result of civil engineering - or lack of same.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22085
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 518 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #7 on: 29/08/2017 21:23:10 »
Quote from: mrsmith2211 on 29/08/2017 00:59:31
So what are you trying to say?
You have to make allowances for tkadm30's inability to understand evidence.
He believes essentially anything he sees on crackpot websites.
Check his other threads on the subject.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #8 on: 29/08/2017 22:15:13 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/08/2017 21:23:10
You have to make allowances for tkadm30's inability to understand evidence.
He believes essentially anything he sees on crackpot websites.
Check his other threads on the subject.

Thanks for not even attempting to answer my initial question. Your systematic denial of independent research is probably the reason you miss the point. Please stop the emotional ranting and confront me with reasonable arguments. Otherwise, we have no reason to believe in your nonsense.
 
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5800
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 250 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #9 on: 30/08/2017 01:45:12 »
No, because there is no reason to believe that geoengineering had anything to do with Hurricane Harvey. No verifiable evidence has been presented by the OP.
Logged
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #10 on: 30/08/2017 07:24:41 »
"Bizarre Radar Anomaly Over Corpus Christi Texas 2 Days Before Harvey Landfall Indicates Mass Weather Modification Took Place."

Quote
Friday, Aug 25th, 2017:  Looking at the SSEC Watervapor map on a 28 hour loop, we see that hurricane Harvey was being targeted with microwave RF sufficient to temporarily destroy the eyewall’s organization at two separate times in this loop as the storm advanced in a Northeast path toward Texas. In the previous two videos we show the distinct markings of the microwave transmitter targeting Harvey, superheating various areas near its center which generate pressure waves and ‘blast’ patterns while disrupting the convective process in the storm.

https://chemtrailsplanet.net/2017/08/26/weather-terrorists-engineer-hurricane-harvey-for-maximum-destruction/amp/

http://allnewspipeline.com/Hurricane_Harvey_Weather_Modification_Evidence.php

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/harvey-steered-texas-coast-microwave-burst-haarp/206437

https://geopolitics.co/2014/02/04/u-s-attacked-philippines-using-haarp/
« Last Edit: 30/08/2017 10:08:33 by tkadm30 »
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Online alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11472
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 687 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #11 on: 30/08/2017 10:03:54 »
Anything injected into the upper atmosphere by any means, will be about 5000 miles to the east in 24 hours.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #12 on: 30/08/2017 10:07:25 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 30/08/2017 10:03:54
Anything injected into the upper atmosphere by any means, will be about 5000 miles to the east in 24 hours.

We are talking about satellite-controlled microwave radiation here.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22085
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 518 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #13 on: 30/08/2017 17:54:18 »
Quote from: tkadm30 on 29/08/2017 22:15:13
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/08/2017 21:23:10
You have to make allowances for tkadm30's inability to understand evidence.
He believes essentially anything he sees on crackpot websites.
Check his other threads on the subject.

Thanks for not even attempting to answer my initial question. Your systematic denial of independent research is probably the reason you miss the point. Please stop the emotional ranting and confront me with reasonable arguments. Otherwise, we have no reason to believe in your nonsense.
 
It was pretty clear that I was seeking to answer someone else's question, rather than yours.
Theirs had the advantage of making sense.

Once again, you haven't presented any evidence of geoengineering on any meaningful scale, never mind evidence that it is responsible for any particular event.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22085
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 518 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #14 on: 30/08/2017 17:54:56 »
Quote from: tkadm30 on 30/08/2017 10:07:25
Quote from: alancalverd on 30/08/2017 10:03:54
Anything injected into the upper atmosphere by any means, will be about 5000 miles to the east in 24 hours.

We are talking about satellite-controlled microwave radiation here.

Royal we?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5800
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 250 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #15 on: 30/08/2017 22:50:50 »
Quote from: tkadm30 on 30/08/2017 07:24:41
"Bizarre Radar Anomaly Over Corpus Christi Texas 2 Days Before Harvey Landfall Indicates Mass Weather Modification Took Place."

Quote
Friday, Aug 25th, 2017:  Looking at the SSEC Watervapor map on a 28 hour loop, we see that hurricane Harvey was being targeted with microwave RF sufficient to temporarily destroy the eyewall’s organization at two separate times in this loop as the storm advanced in a Northeast path toward Texas. In the previous two videos we show the distinct markings of the microwave transmitter targeting Harvey, superheating various areas near its center which generate pressure waves and ‘blast’ patterns while disrupting the convective process in the storm.

https://chemtrailsplanet.net/2017/08/26/weather-terrorists-engineer-hurricane-harvey-for-maximum-destruction/amp/

http://allnewspipeline.com/Hurricane_Harvey_Weather_Modification_Evidence.php

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/harvey-steered-texas-coast-microwave-burst-haarp/206437

https://geopolitics.co/2014/02/04/u-s-attacked-philippines-using-haarp/

What verifiable evidence do you have that the radar anomaly was caused specifically by man-made microwave beams? Please don't say, "we have no other explanation for it, therefore it had to be man-made microwave beams", because that would be the argument from ignorance fallacy. Fallacies prove nothing. How about giving us some verifiable evidence that these weather modification satellites exist in the first place?

I'm not asking for some reference to a vague program from the past for which we have no confirmation that it ever reached the scale you propose. I'm asking for unambiguous evidence that these satellites exist now and have the ability to control hurricanes. I'm asking for evidence that is verifiable and does not invoke any kind of fallacious logic. I have yet to see you provide this kind of evidence.
Logged
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #16 on: 30/08/2017 23:02:41 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 30/08/2017 22:50:50
What verifiable evidence do you have that the radar anomaly was caused specifically by man-made microwave beams? Please don't say, "we have no other explanation for it, therefore it had to be man-made microwave beams", because that would be the argument from ignorance fallacy. Fallacies prove nothing. How about giving us some verifiable evidence that these weather modification satellites exist in the first place?

I'm not asking for some reference to a vague program from the past for which we have no confirmation that it ever reached the scale you propose. I'm asking for unambiguous evidence that these satellites exist now and have the ability to control hurricanes. I'm asking for evidence that is verifiable and does not invoke any kind of fallacious logic. I have yet to see you provide this kind of evidence.

Do you have any idea what are the capacities of the HAARP system?
HAARP technology is fully functioning and capable of altering geomagnetic storms, including hurricanes.
See: http://www.google.com/patents/US4686605
« Last Edit: 31/08/2017 09:41:00 by tkadm30 »
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5800
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 250 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #17 on: 30/08/2017 23:37:18 »
Quote from: tkadm30 on 30/08/2017 23:02:41
Do you have any idea what are the capacities of the HAARP system?
HAARP technology is fully functioning and capable of altering atmospheric storms, including hurricanes.
See: http://www.google.com/patents/US4686605

A search of that patent didn't bring up the term "HAARP" even once. Give us evidence that HAARP is indeed capable of altering the weather on the scale that you propose. Just for the sake of argument, even if part of the original intention of the HAARP program was to alter the weather, that doesn't mean that they were actually able to pull it off in any significant manner. People have tried to use silver iodide to modify the weather but the results were ambiguous at best. How do you know HAARP didn't turn out the same way? Falling short of expectations and instead being used for other purposes? Show some definitive link between HAARP and any given weather event.

The energy available to HAARP is far too small to conceivably have any important effect on something like a hurricane. The facility can produce a radio signal with 3.6 million watts of power, whereas the average hurricane releases around 600 trillion watts of heat energy: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/hurricane-power.html. That means HAARP has only 0.0000006% of the power output of an average hurricane (making the hurricane 167 million times more powerful). That's like comparing the power output of a candle to that of some power plants.
« Last Edit: 31/08/2017 08:28:59 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline mrsmith2211

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #18 on: 31/08/2017 00:28:45 »
OK, who would do this with HAARP and why? Given the massive scale of the storm I consider it improbable.
Logged
 

Offline tkadm30 (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2439
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • IsotopeResearch
Re: Is Hurricane Harvey evidence of geoengineering? (NO, IT ISN'T!)
« Reply #19 on: 31/08/2017 10:06:05 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 30/08/2017 23:37:18
The energy available to HAARP is far too small to conceivably have any important effect on something like a hurricane. The facility can produce a radio signal with 3.6 million watts of power, whereas the average hurricane releases around 600 trillion watts of heat energy: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/hurricane-power.html. That means HAARP has only 0.0000006% of the power output of an average hurricane (making the hurricane 167 million times more powerful). That's like comparing the power output of a candle to that of some power plants.

The HAARP ionospheric heater may intensify tropical hurricanes and geomagnetic storms through geometric modulation:

Quote
Geometric Modulation

Instead of modulating the power of the HF array, and thus not using it at its maximum power, geometric modulation relies on leaving the array on, but moving the beam across the sky at the ELF frequency. Figure 2 shows some examples where the beam can sweep a line or circle in the sky. Each portion of the ionosphere is effectively being heated at the ELF frequency. The heated area is larger which results in larger overall ELF power, and there is phasing between each heated region, which can impart some directionality to the radiated ELF (Cohen et al., 2008; Cohen et al., 2010).

See: http://vlf.stanford.edu/research/experiments-haarp-ionospheric-heater

Note also that High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is supported by the US Air Force Research Laboratory.
« Last Edit: 31/08/2017 10:08:55 by tkadm30 »
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: geoengineering  / weather manipulation  / hurricane harvey  / flooding 
 

Similar topics (5)

What's the evidence for "starving a fever"?

Started by glovesforfoxesBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 3
Views: 9870
Last post 21/07/2009 21:24:21
by Bored chemist
Is there evidence for the concept of "hexagonal water"?

Started by katieHaylorBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 5
Views: 5049
Last post 13/07/2017 21:23:56
by chris
Dying Honeybees and Dying Bats - evidence of impending pole reversal?

Started by blazeBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 9600
Last post 03/11/2008 19:35:21
by Bored chemist
What evidence in 1965 proved "background radiation" a remnant from the big bang?

Started by Karen W.Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 27
Views: 12413
Last post 04/11/2007 07:43:09
by syhprum
Could we detect evidence of civilisation on the night side of a transiting planet?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 3761
Last post 12/03/2012 11:52:10
by imatfaal
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 82 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.