The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Fishy humans?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Fishy humans?

  • 5 Replies
  • 2271 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline colarris (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 72
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Fishy humans?
« on: 22/11/2017 23:13:13 »
If life first started on Earth within the seas does that then mean that somewhere deep within us, perhaps in our DNA, there are still remnants of our watery past?
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5789
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 247 times
    • View Profile
Re: Fishy humans?
« Reply #1 on: 23/11/2017 02:25:54 »
We share a good percentage of our DNA with fish, so yes.
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 274 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Fishy humans?
« Reply #2 on: 23/11/2017 07:32:33 »
This is a really interesting question; thanks for asking it.

As @Kryptid points out, the observation that the genes present in humans (and many other animals) are close matches with those found in fish and, for that matter, right across the trees of life including plants and bacteria, is the strongest evidence we have for the existence of a universal common ancestor (UCA) for all life on Earth.

The fact that you can take a gene from any life-form, be it human, plant, or jellyfish, and insert it into the DNA of E.coli bacteria - where it will be interpreted correctly and the recipe that it encodes expressed as functioning protein - is proof that the code evolved once, and probably over 3.5 billion years ago.

On this basis, it's impossibly unlikely that the same genetic code, and genetic rules that govern the interpretation of that code, evolved identically, multiple times in parallel during evolution.

Therefore, we are related not just to the fish in the sea but also to the grass on your lawn, the algae on your front step and the bacteria living in your bowels. Quite a big extended family when you think about it!
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 
The following users thanked this post: colarris

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9206
  • Activity:
    74%
  • Thanked: 927 times
    • View Profile
Re: Fishy humans?
« Reply #3 on: 23/11/2017 08:46:07 »
Quote from: colarris
somewhere deep within us..., there are still remnants of our watery past?
Some current theories suggest that life began in hydrothermal vents, or in shallow ponds.

Inside each of our cells, there is a watery environment that may reflect that original environment.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytoplasm
Logged
 

Offline colarris (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 72
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Fishy humans?
« Reply #4 on: 23/11/2017 21:18:27 »
Appreciate the replies and thanks for the answers. Interesting. :)
Logged
 



Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 274 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Fishy humans?
« Reply #5 on: 24/11/2017 23:47:04 »
Quote from: colarris on 23/11/2017 21:18:27
Appreciate the replies and thanks for the answers. Interesting. :)

Thanks for the thought-provoking question!
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: dna  / evolution  / human ancestors  / genetic code 
 

Similar topics (5)

Could we engineer humans so that Vitamin C is no longer a Vitamin?

Started by evan_auBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 3
Views: 4249
Last post 21/05/2017 13:51:05
by puppypower
When and where was the original "adam and eve" of the early humans/apes?

Started by horizonBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 4
Views: 4728
Last post 01/09/2011 12:54:32
by Don_1
Could we engineer humans to reduce Type 2 Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and Gout?

Started by evan_auBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 0
Views: 3046
Last post 05/11/2015 18:02:35
by evan_au
If Humans Were Wiped Out Would The World Survive ? (A nuclear power question)

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 20
Views: 20339
Last post 12/01/2019 04:14:43
by Monox D. I-Fly
Surely the van arken belt would stop humans reaching the moon?

Started by gazza711Board That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 49
Views: 14770
Last post 26/12/2015 05:44:48
by mriver8
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.152 seconds with 48 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.