[Bored chemist]

Admit that you can not answer these questions, relying on the lunar theory of tides.

I did answer them.
You quoted my answer.

Why are you trolling?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Dynamic Theory of Tides
http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/645fall2003_web.dir/Ellie_Boyce/dynamic.htm
Instead of circumnavigating the world, the tide wave is broken up into numerous smaller cells, called amphidromic systems. Within each cell, the tide wave circles around an amphidromic point.

Who in this forum is well prepared to comment on the dynamic model of the tides.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

1. Why the height of the tides in the White Sea is 100 times greater than in the Baltic Sea.
The height of the tides in the Baltic Sea is 10 cm, and in the White Sea 10 meters.

2. Why the height of the tides, on the west coast of the Nova Scotia Peninsula (the Bay of Fundy) is 20 times greater than on the eastern coast of the peninsula, but it should be all the opposite (where the logic is).

3. Why the height of the tides on the western coast of the peninsula of Kamchatka is 25 times greater than on the eastern coast of the peninsula, but it should be all the opposite (where the logic is).

4. How to explain the fact that in south-western Australia in the port of Fremantle, tides for half a year disappear.

5. Once a year in the delta of the Northern Dvina, the tides mysteriously disappear for several days, sometimes for a week, and this is considered one of the mysteries of nature (the White Sea).

Only practicing oceanographers can answer these questions.

[Bored chemist]

Only practicing oceanographers can answer these questions.

That's plainly not true because I already answered them, and I'm not an oceanographer.
Why did you say it?
Do you not realise that saying things which are obviously nonsense makes you look bad?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

That's plainly not true because I already answered them, and I'm not an oceanographer.

If you are not an oceanographer, why do you take responsibility, comment on something that you do not know.

[Bored chemist]

That's plainly not true because I already answered them, and I'm not an oceanographer.

If you are not an oceanographer, why do you take responsibility, comment on something that you do not know.

I don't need to be an oceanographer to point out that you are wrong.
Nor would being an oceanographer  show that you were right.
That mistake is so well documented that it has its own wiki page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

When it comes down to it, you are still clearly wrong.
I can answer those questions, and I'm not an oceanographer so your assertion

Only practicing oceanographers can answer these questions.

is not correct.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Along the equatorial zone, "tidal force" is everywhere the same, and there is no need to calculate it.
(It can be conditionally aligned 1).
The height of the tide in the equatorial zone depends only on the shape of the bay.

[Bored chemist]

That's a nice video of a Tidal Bore
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_bore
so what?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Along the equatorial zone, "tidal force" is everywhere the same, and there is no need to calculate it.
(It can be conditionally aligned 1).
The height of the tide in the equatorial zone depends only on the shape of the bay.

On the territory of England, the "tidal force" is everywhere the same, and the height of the tides is everywhere different, why.
(The range of tides is 0 to 15 meters)?

[Bored chemist]

In England, the "tidal power" is the same everywhere, and the height of the tides is different, why?

I already answered that here
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=74403.msg552820#msg552820

why don't you pay attention?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

You consciously leave the answer.
Call the sea where there are high tides, but there is no fast flow.

I'm sorry, but that made little sense.

The places where the tidal range is larger are generally where the tide is funneled into a bay or estuary.
Because the tidal bulge (dragged by the moon's gravity) enters the funnel and travels along it, the same volume of water is forced into a narrow passage and so it has to get deeper.

Why is that so hard for you to understand?

You do not want to add anything else.

[Bored chemist]

You do not want to add anything else.

Why would I?
I answered the question...

But why do you keep asking the same question?
Are you hoping reality will change?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Why in England, "tidal force" is everywhere the same, and the height of the tides is different.
(The range of tides is 0 to 15 meters)?

Why do you leave the answer, this is the right question.

[Bored chemist]

Why in England, "tidal force" is everywhere the same, and the height of the tides is different.
(The range of tides is 0 to 15 meters)?

Why do you leave the answer, this is the right question.

Any bright school child would realise the answer is that "other things are involved".

Why don't you?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Scientific journal "NBIX-Nauka. Technology" No. 4/2018. Page 104.
(Nanotechnological Society of Russia)
http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/news/2018/vyshel-chetvertyi-nomer-zhurnala-nbiks-naukatekhnologii

A positive review of 20 members of the editorial board of this authoritative journal is another convincing argument for the correctness of this theory.
I think the members of the editorial board knew what responsibility they bear for an objective evaluation of this theory.

[Bored chemist]

Scientific journal "NBIX-Nauka. Technology" No. 4/2018. Page 104.
(Nanotechnological Society of Russia)
http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/news/2018/vyshel-chetvertyi-nomer-zhurnala-nbiks-naukatekhnologii

A positive review of 20 members of the editorial board of this authoritative journal is another convincing argument for the correctness of this theory.
I think the members of the editorial board knew what responsibility they bear for an objective evaluation of this theory.

Seriously?
You didn't know the difference between a paper in NAture and an advert.
And you think that's an "authoritative journal".

Even if it was, all you have done is repeat the "appeal to authority" fallacy.

Why do you think a nanotech journal knows anything about tides.
And,, my Russian's not up to checking, but it looks rather like "vanity publishing" to me.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

This theory has very good testability.
If high tides form on that bank where you are standing, it means that the current is moving fast along this bank.
It is easy to check based on a map of the sea currents that are on the Internet.

Approximately the tide chart will look like this:
1 km / h - 1 meter.
2 km / h - 2 meter.
3 km / h - 3 meter.
And so on.
And no philosophy.

[Bored chemist]

This theory has very good testability.

Then what are you waiting for?

When you have done that you need to do the important thing.

Show that the data is not consistent with the established  idea of how tides work.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

This theory has very good testability.
If high tides form on that bank where you are standing, it means that the current is moving fast along this bank.
It is easy to check based on a map of the sea currents that are on the Internet.

Approximately the tide chart will look like this:
1 km / h - 1 meter.
2 km / h - 2 meter.
3 km / h - 3 meter.
And so on.
And no philosophy.

The amplitude of the tides also depends on the size of the whirlpools, the amount of water under the whirlpool, the distance from the coast to the whirlpool, and the direction of flow (to the west, east, north, south).

[Bored chemist]

Saying all that doesn't help.
What you need to do is show that you can predict the tides better than the established model.
In particular, you need to show that the established model gets things wrong.
Until you do that, you are wasting everybody's time.