[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).

I guess that would leave you as the only member of the forum, now wouldn't it?

Funny how you ignored my questions about whether the Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.

Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180

[Bored chemist]

If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).

I am convinced that you don't know what you are talking about.

[Bored chemist]

If this post does not convince you of anything, you need to escape from this forum and science (quickly).

I guess that would leave you as the only member of the forum, now wouldn't it?

Funny how you ignored my questions about whether the Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.

Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180

I rebutted both those posts of yours at the time.
Since they are known not to be true, there's not much point telling people to read them.

[Kryptid]

Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180

So you're still dodging my question...

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Moon's gravity reaches the Earth or not.

Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=73127.180

[Bored chemist]

Before you write a post, you need to read the topic. (adhering to a minimum of morality).
Answer 182, 184:

Why should he read two wrong posts?
Just answer the question.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

1. Why should he read two wrong posts?
2. Just answer the question.

These two sentences contradict each other.

[Bored chemist]

1. Why should he read two wrong posts?
2. Just answer the question.

These two sentences contradict each other.

How is reading two posts that say something that's not true, going to answer the question?

Why are you unable to answer his question unless he reads some posts that don't say anything?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.

[Colin2B]

Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.

Whether @Kryptid participates or not has no effect on whether this topic is closed.
This topic is open to anyone.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.

[opportunity]

I think the general "volume" of water is greater around the equator, and thus owing to the pull of the mass beneath the water table there would "have to" be more variation at the poles. Yet in the event of polar melting, that ice would be held as water more equatorial, yet of course the idea of tidal fluctuations "outside" that equatorial rim still the norm.


The basic issue is the centrifugal effect of the spin of the planet holding the mass of water "more" equatorial, hence tidal influences "more" polar. Apologies for not highlighting that point I was underwriting.


Here's something interesting that ocean wildlife appears to be yielding to:
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/sydney-s-marine-life-turning-troppo-as-coral-other-species-head-south-20180904-p501ns.html

Another issue:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/kiribati/9127576/Entire-nation-of-Kiribati-to-be-relocated-over-rising-sea-level-threat.html

[The Spoon]

"Приливная сила" в экваториальной зоне везде одинакова.
Тогда почему, высота приливов разная.

?

[Bored chemist]

Kryptid said that he no longer participates in the discussion of the topic. So the question was closed.

That does not stop you answering the question he asked, does it?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.

[The Spoon]

"Приливная сила" в экваториальной зоне везде одинакова.
Тогда почему, высота приливов разная.

And what does that mean? Why don't you use the language that is used on the forum?

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.

[The Spoon]

"Tidal force" in the equatorial zone is the same everywhere.
Then why, the height of the tides is different.

As has been explained to you previously, because of local topography. You choose to ignore it though , because it does not fit in with your fantasy.
Please answer my question above.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

1. Because of local topography, the amplitude of the tides can not be so different, at the same height of the tidal wave.
2. On top of many questions, please repeat the question.

[The Spoon]

1. Because of local topography, the amplitude of the tides can not be so different, at the same height of the tidal wave.

What does that even mean?
And the question was as to why you are posting in Russian when people on the forum do not understand this language as you well know, but chose to ignore.