[guest39538]

I used my values because they were the values to use ,

Why?

are you trying to say I am giving the answer without the question ?

Yes, or at least, without explaining why the answer answers the question.

If I tell you that the determinant of the matrix
1
.

Why ?   Because that is what I used..   In the beginning there had to be some sort of manifestation of energy , obvious in science we use the E value for energy.  I learnt this stuff dude,  put it together . 

1 whole, there is 1 infinite in example....


added - how long is 1 piece of string....see


Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string, and the dot becomes as long as the piece of string...


How about :

E₁³  /    n³     +     E₂³  /    n³   =  S


To be honest my friend, I have no idea where this maths is coming from , I am just doing it.   There is something wrong with me, its called being a super genius.....


And no I am not using my super super MK rifle to force the idea on anyone, it works dude....


So with values 0.5 , 

S= 1 and is any dimension ...

[Bored chemist]

Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,

Srsly?

[guest39538]

Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,

Srsly?

The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.

[Kryptid]

Srsly?

So if I divide an apple pie by an aircraft carrier, the apple pie becomes as long as the aircraft carrier. We've just discovered the solution to the problem of world hunger.

[guest39538]

Srsly?

So if I divide an apple pie by an aircraft carrier, the apple pie becomes as long as the aircraft carrier. We've just discovered the solution to the problem of world hunger.

Not quite, but if you divide a point charge by your air craft carrier, the energy will become a part of the total energy /entropy of the isolated system.  As you know things reach room temperature by the laws of thermodynamics, hence the energy spreads out evenly in a system trying to retain an equilibrium throughout the system, higher energy passive to lower energy states and vice versus.    To express your aircraft carrier and point charge


ΔS = ΔE



where E is energy and S is entropy.   

[Bored chemist]

The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.

Srsly?

[guest39538]

The string is stationary , the low state can't move so the high state moves.....any high point is attracted to a low point and vice versus, thermodynamics.

Srsly?

Space is the string in the example, you really need to use your imagination.

What is the purpose of repeating myself all the time , I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever. 

The factor of this is x , what is the principle of locality compared to irrational interface of conjecture in the eye of perspective without interference of the bars of impracticable without literal meaning or purpose without knowing what on this earth is the actual principle behind the fundamentals of this paragraph with meaning intent to nothing other than solely bored and don't know what I am doing because of the principles of protocol in dimensions of 0 compared to existence of further anomalies within a finite universe of spag bolonase, mixed in with glorified noodles and hogwash in a state of had enough in regards to the everything and nothing of reality on Saturday which went before it was Sunday in the state of fried rice with curry and chips befor the salsa and the nachos in a cumberland sausage sauce mixed in with hard tunes and etiquette while dancing with my blue swede shoes from sweden in the valleys of timber falls because of the matter of chickens and eggs and what came first in an omelette when ram see got all technical and shouted at the chef while wearing a white hat for which he had no reason why nothing really happened.   

[guest39538]

The NFUE model recognizes the importance and significance of a binary construct universe,  recognizing that from this, we may be able to manufacture new technology such as the NFUE model space-time inversion propulsion device, ''free'' energy,  power cells, plasma reactors.

To be continued,...

[Bored chemist]

I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever. 

You do.

[guest39538]

I might as well just post random paragraphs of no meaning what so ever. 

You do.

Who are you trying to kid?  People can read Mr Chemist, my model is a valid model like it or not. 

[guest39538]

YES I THINK IT IS POSSIBLE ! 

[Bored chemist]

People can read

How many have supported this idea of yours?

[guest39538]

People can read

How many have supported this idea of yours?

The very fact that nobody has contested my notions , therefore shows my notions to be good theory and logically of sound mind and good physics. 

You validate my notions by not arguing my notions. Show it to be wrong ?

Once you can see nothingness , physics is easy.

added: Take note : ourselves are far more complex than the infinite Universe will ever be.

[Bored chemist]

You validate my notions by not arguing my notions.

Nonsense.
I might choose not to argue because I have better things to do.
But often it's because you say things that make no sense like "Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,"

It's like trying to answer the question "Is Thursday purple?" or  trying to answer " left handed artichokes smell tunefully".

It's impossible to say anything about them except that they make no sense.
They are, as Pauli would have put it "not even wrong".

[guest39538]

I might choose not to argue because I have better things to do.

But you are arguing now in another way .   

Let  us rewind the NFUE model to the opening post,

Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?

[Bored chemist]

Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?

Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,

[The Spoon]

Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?

Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,

It is linguistic free form jazz.

[Bored chemist]

Do you agree in my very objective opinion of what nothingness is compared to what no thing is ?

Your opening post pretty much all falls into the category of "not even wrong".
To be either right or wrong it would have to be meaningful and it's not.
It is full of made up phrases that are composed of words that have no relation to one another,

It is linguistic free form jazz.

What's it doing  on a science page?