[Bored chemist]

but not in  a way that the hydrogen atom is split

Nobody ever said it was.
That's not what combustion means.

I have just realised science doesn't know what fire really is does it ?

Well... someone doesn't.

and that's you.

[guest39538]

but not in  a way that the hydrogen atom is split

Nobody ever said it was.
That's not what combustion means.

I have just realised science doesn't know what fire really is does it ?

Well... someone doesn't.

and that's you.

I know what fire is , it's excitement that produces visible light . A little more complex than that but in basics .

[Kryptid]

U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously .

What would that represent in normal science language? What would "u" for hydrogen represent? What would "E" for hydrogen represent? I can't help you with your calculations until I get the needed clarification so I can look up values.

[guest39538]

U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously .

What would that represent in normal science language? What would "u" for hydrogen represent? What would "E" for hydrogen represent? I can't help you with your calculations until I get the needed clarification so I can look up values.

U for hydrogen would be the total amount of charge in the system , the only problem is it always measures 0 because of the neutral formed .

E for hydrogen would be when some work gets done such as 0 being split in two or kinetic response  by

Δ = ΔV = ΔkE

[Kryptid]

U for hydrogen would be the total amount of charge in the system , the only problem is it always measures 0 because of the neutral formed .

So does that mean I should be put zero in for u?

[guest39538]

U for hydrogen would be the total amount of charge in the system , the only problem is it always measures 0 because of the neutral formed .

So does that mean I should be put zero in for u?

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol''  and ''cold'' fused unless there is kinetic action happening .

[Kryptid]

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol'' .

So how am I supposed to get a meaningful calculation out of the equation?

[Bored chemist]

I know what fire is

Then why are you trying to pretend that hydrogen doesn't combust?

[guest39538]

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol'' .

So how am I supposed to get a meaningful calculation out of the equation?

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

[guest39538]

I know what fire is

Then why are you trying to pretend that hydrogen doesn't combust?

I'm not , I had visions of you thinking that atoms burn out of existence for some reason .  I also prefer the term react which is more deep .

[Kryptid]

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

The amount of energy released when one gram of hydrogen burns in an oxygen atmosphere is a particular value. If your equation is correct, then it can produce that value. In order to produce that value, one particular number must be substituted for "u". So is that number zero or is it not zero?

[The Spoon]

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol'' .

So how am I supposed to get a meaningful calculation out of the equation?

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

Little squirmy worm aren't you? Trying to avoid a straight answer because you know it will reveal what a hollow fool you are.

[guest39538]

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

The amount of energy released when one gram of hydrogen burns in an oxygen atmosphere is a particular value. If your equation is correct, then it can produce that value. In order to produce that value, one particular number must be substituted for "u". So is that number zero or is it not zero?

If you already have the value and equation you suppose to use that equation, my equation just generalises the process's and is meant as an education aid  in simplicity .  In other words you don't have to work out an answer , it tells the ''story'' of the process's .

If you like , call it the most useful , useless equation ever .  As a teaching aid for the maths mediocre minded like my self , it is awesome .

[guest39538]

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol'' .

So how am I supposed to get a meaningful calculation out of the equation?

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

Little squirmy worm aren't you? Trying to avoid a straight answer because you know it will reveal what a hollow fool you are.

Insulting aren't you ?
Where's your theory ?

[Kryptid]

If you already have the value and equation you suppose to use that equation, my equation just generalises the process's and is meant as an education aid  in simplicity .  In other words you don't have to work out an answer , it tells the ''story'' of the process's .

So can it calculate the energy released when hydrogen combusts or not?

[guest39538]

If you already have the value and equation you suppose to use that equation, my equation just generalises the process's and is meant as an education aid  in simplicity .  In other words you don't have to work out an answer , it tells the ''story'' of the process's .

So can it calculate the energy released when hydrogen combusts or not?

Well in theory yes if you're good at maths and can work out the values .

You have to work out u then you have to work out ignition energy added to the system and the kinetic response energy .

Alternatively we could work backwards , 1ltr of hydrogen  volumes energy combusted,  divided by a volume of water , temp measure etc and reverse engineer the results to get an exact measure .

[Kryptid]

Well in theory yes

Then that is what I'm trying to do. If "u" is equal to the net electric charge in a hydrogen molecule, then "u" has to be zero.

[guest39538]

Well in theory yes

Then that is what I'm trying to do. If "u" is equal to the net electric charge in a hydrogen molecule, then "u" has to be zero.

Well yes if we're being honest , can we call this , the idol moment ?

[Kryptid]

Well yes if we're being honest , can we call this , the idol moment ?

Okay then, so what would "E" represent in the equation in normal science language?

[The Spoon]

Well actually yes but you have to understand that 0 is a range from zero to infinite but will still measure 0 . Unless there's work being done , 0 remains ''idol'' .

So how am I supposed to get a meaningful calculation out of the equation?

Well , it will take some skill , like I've stated the equation is a generalised equation that explains a lot of different process's but as for values , (shrugs shoulders) . 

It does explain the process 's so there must be values . 

Maybe we could express

u=var(x)

Little squirmy worm aren't you? Trying to avoid a straight answer because you know it will reveal what a hollow fool you are.

Insulting aren't you ?
Where's your theory ?

I don't and never claimed to have a theory. You seem to think it isall about who has the biggest theory don't you? A kind of science dick waving contest. It shows your complete lack of understanding of science.