[guest39538]

What don't you have an answer too ?

There are a lot of things that we don't know yet, but I'll give you something that could potentially be addressed with math: what is the melting point of the yet-to-be-synthesized element 119?

An interesting question that you would have to melt the element firstly to find this melting point .  If you don't the math would be speculative and really meaningless .

However , we can assume even though we have little information to go off , that the element has mass and therefore a density . The denser the mass the harder it will me to melt  into a liquid .

But in all honesty they should discover the Ununennium before they make experiment to gain some maths .

Δ does cover it though 

Because Δ = ΔkE = ΔT = Δρ where p is density

[Kryptid]

An interesting question that you would have to melt the element firstly to find this melting point .  If you don't the math would be speculative and really meaningless .

Welp, there's one thing your equation can't answer.

[guest39538]

An interesting question that you would have to melt the element firstly to find this melting point .  If you don't the math would be speculative and really meaningless .

Welp, there's one thing your equation can't answer.

There's a few things it can't answer , it answers many other things but not all things , it evens answers human growth development from the fetal stage

 Δ

[Bored chemist]

It is your job to prove that it does explain things.

Ok, I've now altered it slightly

Lets ask it a question

Why does metal expand when heated ?

Δ

Where U³ is internal energy volume 1 =

And where u is external energy propagating through volume Vⁿ

OK, can you show why lead expands more on heating than steel does, but tungsten expands less than steel?

[guest39538]

OK, can you show why lead expands more on heating than steel does, but tungsten expands less than steel?

Not with that equation , your question is more specific  and independent from the equation . Your question is related to field density  and c.o.m

[guest39538]

Further information on my 5d model .

The 5D model is an advanced version of Albert Einstein's space-time continuum , it replaces the time dimension with entropy but I may change that to enthalpy , additionally it adds an energy dimension in considering that xyz is full of energy .

ΔV = Δ or Δ

Expressed with my equation

ΔV = Δ


Added - Should I keep time and entropy , add enthalpy and have a 7D model ?

Einstein considered space-time energy and never added it as a dimension to his model , I'm filling in his ''blanks ''.

xyztESH 

Is my space-time analysis , 7 dimensions of interwoven space-time .


Added -  lolz , enthalpy considers temperture , if I was change enthalpy H to temperature T

xyztEST

ahahah , that's pretty cool 

Added - Can you pass the xyztEST  =

I Passed basic physics 

[Bored chemist]

OK, can you show why lead expands more on heating than steel does, but tungsten expands less than steel?

Not with that equation , your question is more specific  and independent from the equation . Your question is related to field density  and c.o.m

It failed to explain why you got the answer a million billion billion billion billion fold wrong.

It fails to do anything.
It fails to explain anything.
And you have the burden of proof the wrong way round anyway.
It is your job to prove that it does explain things.

[guest39538]

OK, can you show why lead expands more on heating than steel does, but tungsten expands less than steel?

Not with that equation , your question is more specific  and independent from the equation . Your question is related to field density  and c.o.m

It failed to explain why you got the answer a million billion billion billion billion fold wrong.

It fails to do anything.
It fails to explain anything.
And you have the burden of proof the wrong way round anyway.
It is your job to prove that it does explain things.

If you don't understand this MR C you fail basic physics .


test.jpg (5.96 kB . 349x73 - viewed 1104 times)

[Bored chemist]

If you think that's meaningful you fail basic physics.
What are the units of the quantities involved?

[guest39538]

If you think that's meaningful you fail basic physics.
What are the units of the quantities involved?

You fail ,

[Bored chemist]

What are the units of the quantities involved?

[guest39538]

What are the units of the quantities involved?

+u /

V= = U³

Added-

=ρ0

=p>0

Where ρ is density

→
Ε  =    = ρ0

[guest39538]

@Mr C , I've been thinking some more on Hydrogen combustion and I've reached a conclusion and can envision what happens in the process of combustion .

Considering a single hydrogen atom as the ''point'' of ignition ,

ΔH = ΔU + ρΔV =

The transitional phase is that the lower energy state surrounding volume of hydrogen is centripetally attracted to the higher energy state of ignition ''point' , this causing enthalpic pressure and friction imposed on that point ,  creating heat energy and the combustion chain reaction .

U³F³ = (>U)

arr, so that is also why oxygen fuels fires , the oxygen atoms that are at a lesser energy state come rushing to the higher energy state of ignition causing collisions of particles that create the energizing glow of fire .

added- In further thought the interesting discovery from this is that we could possibly conclude friction can create a visible wave-length ~600-620nm  .

[guest39538]

Hydrogen-Oxygen chain of combustion


ho.jpg (13.59 kB . 342x239 - viewed 1878 times)

[The Spoon]

What don't you have an answer too ?

There are a lot of things that we don't know yet, but I'll give you something that could potentially be addressed with math: what is the melting point of the yet-to-be-synthesized element 119?

An interesting question that you would have to melt the element firstly to find this melting point .  If you don't the math would be speculative and really meaningless .

However , we can assume even though we have little information to go off , that the element has mass and therefore a density . The denser the mass the harder it will me to melt  into a liquid .

But in all honesty they should discover the Ununennium before they make experiment to gain some maths .

Δ does cover it though 

Because Δ = ΔkE = ΔT = Δρ where p is density

However , we can assume even though we have little information to go off , that the element has mass and therefore a density . The denser the mass the harder it will me to melt  into a liquid .

Thus demonstrating you don't understand what density is or how it relates to physico-chemical properties. Lead is denser than iron but has a lower melting point.

[guest39538]

Lead is denser than iron .

Ostensible , you don't understand how gravity works  or the transitional phase of chemical reactions and viscosity .

ƒ:G =

>U→←<U

<U→←>U

Just consider ''cold'' air ''falling'' to the earth or ''hot'' air rising to the stratosphere .

<U
↓
↑
>U

[The Spoon]

Lead is denser than iron .

Ostensible , you don't understand how gravity works  or the transitional phase of chemical reactions and viscosity .

ƒ:G =

>U→←<U

<U→←>U

Just consider ''cold'' air ''falling'' to the earth or ''hot'' air rising to the stratosphere .

<U
↓
↑
>U

What do you mean ostensible? Do you even understand your new word?
Lead  - density: 11.34 g/cm3 Melting point: 327.46 °C
Iron - density 7.874 g/cm3 melting point: 1538 °C

What is the relevance of the rest of your post pigeon head?

[guest39538]

What do you mean ostensible? Do you even understand your new word?Lead  - density: 11.34 g/cm3 Melting point: 327.46 °CIron - density 7.874 g/cm3 melting point: 1538 °C What is the relevance of the rest of your post pigeon head?

Ostensible means it at first appears to be true but on close inspection turns out not to be true .   


The rest, I've just shown the mechanics of gravity , you would need to understand this before you'd understand the ostensible .

[The Spoon]

What do you mean ostensible? Do you even understand your new word?Lead  - density: 11.34 g/cm3 Melting point: 327.46 °CIron - density 7.874 g/cm3 melting point: 1538 °C What is the relevance of the rest of your post pigeon head?

Ostensible means it at first appears to be true but on close inspection turns out not to be true .   


The rest, I've just shown the mechanics of gravity , you would need to understand this before you'd understand the ostensible .

I know what it means. It is your use of it that I am questioning e.g. using it as a noun 'the ostensible' suggests a lack of of understanding of basic English.

You have not shown an understanding of the mechanics of gravity. What you have shown is that you are wrong about how melting point relates to density and as usual you are trying to bullshit to cover your tracks.

[Bored chemist]

What are the units of the quantities involved?