[guest39538]

Scratches head

That's because none of what you posted makes sense.

It does to me, sorry working out aloud .

A 1kg mass has 9*10^8 joules of energy yes ?  900000000J

[Bored chemist]

This teaching website gives a representation of what really happens.
https://learn.concord.org/resources/804/chain-reaction-between-hydrogen-and-oxygen

And here's the version you won't understand.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/cp/c7cp05639g#!divAbstract

[Bored chemist]

A 1kg mass has 9*10^8 joules of energy yes ?  900000000J

No
Where did you get that silly idea?

[guest39538]

This teaching website gives a representation of what really happens.
https://learn.concord.org/resources/804/chain-reaction-between-hydrogen-and-oxygen

And here's the version you won't understand.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/cp/c7cp05639g#!divAbstract

Why would I need to use a link when I can think about what happens myself ?

Is my 1kg energy value correct  ?

Please humour me if nothing else .

[guest39538]

A 1kg mass has 9*10^8 joules of energy yes ?  900000000J

No
Where did you get that silly idea?

Search engine , best answer . 

What is it then  ?

[guest39538]

1kg = 1000j is another answer I have ?

[guest39538]

If kg = 1000j

I now have a new measure kE=94.4076141J total 944076.141J

still not correct , I forgot do something

Added - no that is correct …

  =  = = 0.1J per point = 0.000001kg per point

kE=F=9.81N³  = 0.1* 9.81N³ = 94.4076141j

94.4076141j * 1000000 = 94407614.1j

A mass increase to 0.000944076141kg per point

added- might of done the mass increase incorrect , i'll think about that .

[Kryptid]

can your equation explain why there is much more matter in the Universe than antimatter?

[guest39538]

can your equation explain why there is much more matter in the Universe than antimatter?

You do realise anti matter is not required for the Universe ? 

[Bored chemist]

What is it then  ?

It depends

[Kryptid]

You do realise anti matter is not required for the Universe ? 

Even if that was true, it wouldn't explain why the Universe is almost all matter with very little antimatter.

[guest39538]

You do realise anti matter is not required for the Universe ?

Even if that was true, it wouldn't explain why the Universe is almost all matter with very little antimatter.

A proton is anti-matter relative to another proton , an electron is anti matter relative to another electron . 

Relative to a proton another proton has no mass

Relative to an electron another electron has no mass

[Bored chemist]

A proton is anti-matter relative to another proton

No it isn't.

an electron is anti matter relative to another electron

No it isn't.

Relative to a proton another proton has no mass

That doesn't mean anything.

Relative to an electron another electron has no mass

Nor does that.

[guest39538]

A proton is anti-matter relative to another proton

No it isn't.

an electron is anti matter relative to another electron

No it isn't.

Relative to a proton another proton has no mass

That doesn't mean anything.

Relative to an electron another electron has no mass

Nor does that.

Hmm, yes they are , a proton repulses another proton , it is anti  and likewise an electron repulses another electron , it is anti .

There isn't any other anti matter unless you are going to make something up , saying it exists when it doesn't ?

[Bored chemist]

That's not what anti matter means, and you know it.
You already lost the argument about anti matter not existing, since we have pictures of it.

[guest39538]

That's not what anti matter means, and you know it.
You already lost the argument about anti matter not existing, since we have pictures of it.

Really ? Ok provide the pictures then !

[Bored chemist]

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Trace-of-a-positron-in-a-cloud-chamber-In-a-sealed-vessel-filled-with-vapor-highly_fig2_271765113

It would be a whole lot better if you learned stuff rather than posting nonsense.

[guest39538]

It would be a whole lot better if you learned stuff rather than posting nonsense.

That's hilarious from a science who claims loads of garbage to be true .  You think that little squiggle of a diagram/ picture suppose to mean anti matter ?

How does one conclude such an odd thing ?

[Bored chemist]

How does one conclude such an odd thing ?

By doing what the grown ups call science.

Did you notice, there are 3 different squiggles?
One splits into two and the two spiral squiggles curl in opposite directions.
That opposite curvature induced by the magnetic field means that they must have opposite charges.
But the radii of curvature are pretty much the same- they must, therefore, have the same mass

Well if they both have the mass of an electron, but one has the opposite charge, it must be anti matter.

As I said, if you actually learned some science, rather than posting dross it would be better for everyone.

[guest39538]

How does one conclude such an odd thing ?

By doing what the grown ups call science.

Did you notice, there are 3 different squiggles?
One splits into two and the two spiral squiggles curl in opposite directions.
That opposite curvature induced by the magnetic field means that they must have opposite charges.
But the radii of curvature are pretty much the same- they must, therefore, have the same mass

Well if they both have the mass of an electron, but one has the opposite charge, it must be anti matter.

As I said, if you actually learned some science, rather than posting dross it would be better for everyone.

Well we know science makes lots of things up such as time dilation and the universe is expanding , so why should I think this any difference ? 

The squiggles you provided could mean other things such as cations and anions  or something else .  Seems a strange conclusion to me from so little .