[Bored chemist]

Well we know science makes lots of things up such as time dilation and the universe is expanding ,

No.
Science didn't make those up.

The squiggles you provided could mean other things such as cations and anions  or something else .  Seems a strange conclusion to me from so little .

Yes, but that's because you don't understand it, isn't it?
No anion or cation would have a low enough mass to curve that tightly.
If you had done as I suggested and gone and learned stuff you wouldn't look so stupid.

Perhaps you should start now.

[guest39538]

Well we know science makes lots of things up such as time dilation and the universe is expanding ,

No.
Science didn't make those up.

The squiggles you provided could mean other things such as cations and anions  or something else .  Seems a strange conclusion to me from so little .

Yes, but that's because you don't understand it, isn't it?
No anion or cation would have a low enough mass to curve that tightly.
If you had done as I suggested and gone and learned stuff you wouldn't look so stupid.

Perhaps you should start now.

Perhaps you should start , ''Science didn't make those up'', that's hilarious , the universe expanding and time dilation is pure fantasy , made up .
Come back when you have some correct science to tell me , ok ?

Science is stupid not me...

[Bored chemist]

The evidence shows that they exist.
So the evidence shows that you can't be right.

[guest39538]

The evidence shows that they exist.
So the evidence shows that you can't be right.

What evidence ?  You have no evidence of either .

See destroying big bang and hubble thread .

[Bored chemist]

(Among other things) Red shift and  GPS.
So, yes, we have evidence.
Unfortunately, it seems you don't understand it.
As I keep saying; go and learn.

[guest39538]

(Among other things) Red shift and  GPS.
So, yes, we have evidence.
Unfortunately, it seems you don't understand it.
As I keep saying; go and learn.

The you don't understand malarkey , love it  .  I've already demonstrated the GPS is timing offset and redshift is of receding bodies , not space .  Try again ?

[Kryptid]

Denying the existence of antimatter. Thebox never ceases to amaze me.

[guest39538]

Denying the existence of antimatter. Thebox never ceases to amaze me.

Denying something that is not necessarily  fact  is not naïve that's all . I can explain the entire universe using protons and electrons so why the invention of or need for anti-matter ?

a+b = matter

Anti is a+a or b+b ,   I don't do make believe .

[Bored chemist]

I've already demonstrated the GPS is timing offset and redshift is of receding bodies , not space

Really?
Where?

[Bored chemist]

I can explain the entire universe using protons and electrons so why the invention of or need for anti-matter ?

OK, explain the use of PET imaging in medicine without the use of positrons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography

[guest39538]

I've already demonstrated the GPS is timing offset and redshift is of receding bodies , not space

Really?
Where?

I've demonstrated in the destroy Hubble thread using the Hubble theory to destroy it's own theory .  I've also demonstrated GPS in the destroying time dilation thread .

Why don't you admit you are a government employee and your aim is to try and put people off because you don't want somebody with  no formal qualification making science look stupid ?

[Kryptid]

I don't do make believe .

Says the guy who thought a deviantART picture was proof of aliens.

[guest39538]

I can explain the entire universe using protons and electrons so why the invention of or need for anti-matter ?

OK, explain the use of PET imaging in medicine without the use of positrons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography

Huh ? medicine isn't physics or explaining the universe .

[guest39538]

I don't do make believe .

Says the guy who thought a deviantART picture was proof of aliens.

Well actually , I think humans are proof of Alien existence , we didn't evolve from monkeys , we are reproducing  clones and engineered some how .

[Bored chemist]

I can explain the entire universe using protons and electrons so why the invention of or need for anti-matter ?

OK, explain the use of PET imaging in medicine without the use of positrons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography

Huh ? medicine isn't physics or explaining the universe .

Medicine is part of the universe.
You said you can explain the universe.
That means you can explain PET imaging without using positrons.

Do so: or accept that you lied.

you don't want somebody with  no formal qualification making science look stupid ?

No risk of that round here.

[Bored chemist]

I've demonstrated in the destroy Hubble thread using the Hubble theory to destroy it's own theory .  I've also demonstrated GPS in the destroying time dilation thread .

No.
You posted gibberish.
That's not the same thing.

[Bored chemist]

I think humans are proof of Alien existence

And there you go again.
That's not a logical deduction.

[Bored chemist]

Why don't you admit you are a government employee and your aim is to try and put people off

Because it's not true.

[guest39538]

Why don't you admit you are a government employee and your aim is to try and put people off

Because it's not true.

Well I don't personally believe you or you wouldn't be defending stuff I've quite clearly shown to be false .

Why do you feel you have to defend falsity ?

[Bored chemist]

Why do you feel you have to defend falsity ?

I don't.

stuff I've quite clearly shown to be false .

What you have said is that all the bits of space that we can see are moving apart, and then further apart they are, the faster they move relative to eachother, but they are not expanding.

That's not going to convince a schoolkid, nevermind overturn science.