The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Am I one of the greatest scientists?

  • 29 Replies
  • 1970 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 221
  • Activity:
    0.5%
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #20 on: 09/04/2019 05:20:01 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/04/2019 21:07:08
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 08/04/2019 08:51:38
what I did is to falsify a misconcption about gravity extension

What was it that you falsified?
Gravity is everywhere.
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 4061
  • Activity:
    55.5%
  • Thanked: 181 times
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #21 on: 09/04/2019 06:55:57 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 09/04/2019 05:20:01
Gravity is everywhere.

You need to take into consideration the expanding sphere of gravitational influence of each individual particle in the Universe, not just one of them. Although it might be the case that the gravitational field of the Earth has not yet reached some location a trillion light-years away by now, there should be matter at or near that location which already has gravitational influence there.

Existing observations indicate that the visible universe is highly isotropic and homogeneous at very large scales (meaning that matter is roughly evenly distributed at those scales). By extension, we have no particular reason to believe that this "cosmological principle" suddenly stops applying outside of the visible universe. So for that reason, any random location in the Universe should have matter nearby and therefore gravity.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16236
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #22 on: 09/04/2019 07:25:31 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 09/04/2019 05:20:01
Quote from: Kryptid on 08/04/2019 21:07:08
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 08/04/2019 08:51:38
what I did is to falsify a misconcption about gravity extension

What was it that you falsified?
Gravity is everywhere.
No.
You have claimed it is false.
That's not the same as proving it's false.

You can't scientifically make claims about stuff that's simply too far away for us to tell.
But you made them
So you are not acting as a scientist.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 221
  • Activity:
    0.5%
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #23 on: 09/04/2019 10:07:01 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 09/04/2019 06:55:57
there should be matter at or near that location which already has gravitational influence there.

Existing observations indicate that .........So for that reason, any random location in the Universe should have matter nearby and therefore gravity.
So what ?each mass has its own gravity range if their ranges intersect they will affect each other if not they wn't affect each other.
Space-time is infinite it's beyond our universe.
« Last Edit: 09/04/2019 10:35:16 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 221
  • Activity:
    0.5%
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #24 on: 09/04/2019 10:32:57 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/04/2019 07:25:31
You can't scientifically make claims about stuff that's simply too far away for us to tell.
But you made them
So you are not acting as a scientist.
"Far away for us to tell "? what does that even mean ?
Logged
 



Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 221
  • Activity:
    0.5%
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #25 on: 02/05/2019 08:18:40 »
Science is not a religion if several scientists accepted it there is not a reason for the rest not to accept it even though I don't know after what time I would be recognized worldwide " giving the idea that I'm not native speaker to publish in physics journals to spread it worldwide.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16236
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #26 on: 02/05/2019 18:36:55 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 09/04/2019 10:32:57
"Far away for us to tell "? what does that even mean ?
Why did you leave out the important bit?
"Too far away for us to tell" means "too far away for us to tell".

Did you not understand it?
Which bit don't you get?
Do you understand "too far away"
How about " for us to tell"?
Do you know about the second use given here?
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+tell&oq=define+tell&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2143j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
ell1
/tɛl/
verb
1.
communicate information to someone in spoken or written words.
"I told her you were coming"
synonyms:   inform, let know, notify, apprise, make aware, mention something to, acquaint with, advise, put in the picture, brief, fill in, break the news to; More
2.
decide or determine correctly or with certainty.
"you can tell they're in love"
synonyms:   ascertain, decide, determine, work out, make out, deduce, discern, perceive, see, identify, recognize, understand, comprehend; More

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8007
  • Activity:
    44.5%
  • Thanked: 483 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #27 on: 02/05/2019 19:31:19 »
I haven't seen the original article but here's the problem.

Science begins with observation. Our observation is that gravity always sucks, and the influence of gravity seems to travel at the speed of light.

Now suppose a large source X emits a single graviton Γ from position A. This is detected by a much smaller test mass Y, which begins to move towards A. Thus Γ has a vector property - a tail pointing back to A. But in the zillion years it has taken to reach Y, source X has moved to position B. Γ has no way of knowing where  B is, and there is no other force acting on Y, so it doesn't actually collide with X. However if X emits another graviton, that can change the trajectory of Y  which will spiral around X and may end up in orbit.

Interesting lemma: gravitons contain the history of the universe in their tails!
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 221
  • Activity:
    0.5%
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #28 on: 26/05/2019 19:21:24 »
My view is the only way to solve this contradiction in physics.
« Last Edit: 02/08/2019 07:51:15 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16236
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Am I one of the greatest scientists?
« Reply #29 on: 27/05/2019 10:35:29 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 26/05/2019 19:21:24
My view is the only way to solve this contradiction in physics:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=77027.new#new
There is no contradiction there.
You can not make mass appear suddenly, you can only bring it from somewhere else.
Any of the worlds more or less competent scientists would recognise that (especially after it had been explained to them)
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How many scientists are "spiritual"?

Started by KarstenBoard General Science

Replies: 34
Views: 14811
Last post 09/01/2010 03:08:51
by EatsRainbows
Quantum physics and classic physics history database for scientists and hobbyist

Started by UltimateTheoryBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 2561
Last post 25/07/2016 23:49:39
by UltimateTheory
Which scientists say we've just 18 months to "save planet from climate change"?

Started by MarkPawelekBoard The Environment

Replies: 74
Views: 4870
Last post 31/08/2019 15:03:54
by Bored chemist
Scientists Discover Human Hands Emit Light Energy

Started by esecallumBoard General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 3541
Last post 12/07/2006 21:55:04
by esecallum
Lighter-- Reflects Cam New Theories Scientists doctors & Inventors accurately?

Started by Andrew K FletcherBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 0
Views: 4669
Last post 13/10/2007 13:04:55
by Andrew K Fletcher
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.176 seconds with 56 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.