The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 14   Go Down

Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?

  • 273 Replies
  • 81539 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #180 on: 22/04/2020 05:34:06 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:30:51
I am not sure what is your question,

It's here. The sentence that is underlined:

Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 00:35:06
Just to make sure that you actually understand what conservation of momentum means (because it's far from clear that you do), take a look at this quote from "the Physics Classroom" website: https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/momentum/Lesson-2/Momentum-Conservation-Principle

Quote
One of the most powerful laws in physics is the law of momentum conservation. The law of momentum conservation can be stated as follows.

For a collision occurring between object 1 and object 2 in an isolated system, the total momentum of the two objects before the collision is equal to the total momentum of the two objects after the collision. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2.

The above statement tells us that the total momentum of a collection of objects (a system) is conserved - that is, the total amount of momentum is a constant or unchanging value.

I bolded the important bit. Based on this, do you understand that conservation of momentum means that the total momentum of a closed system cannot change?
Logged
 



Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #181 on: 22/04/2020 05:39:34 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 05:34:06
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:30:51
I am not sure what is your question,

It's here. The sentence that is underlined:

Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 00:35:06
Just to make sure that you actually understand what conservation of momentum means (because it's far from clear that you do), take a look at this quote from "the Physics Classroom" website: https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/momentum/Lesson-2/Momentum-Conservation-Principle

Quote
One of the most powerful laws in physics is the law of momentum conservation. The law of momentum conservation can be stated as follows.

For a collision occurring between object 1 and object 2 in an isolated system, the total momentum of the two objects before the collision is equal to the total momentum of the two objects after the collision. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2.

The above statement tells us that the total momentum of a collection of objects (a system) is conserved - that is, the total amount of momentum is a constant or unchanging value.

I bolded the important bit. Based on this, do you understand that conservation of momentum means that the total momentum of a closed system cannot change?
Yes, please, see the post #179 for the explanation,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #182 on: 22/04/2020 05:49:36 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:39:34
Yes

Good. Now, the following things are true:

(1) The ship starts out with no momentum (angular or linear).
(2) The ship is a closed system (nothing is entering or leaving it).

Given that you have just agreed that a closed system must conserve momentum, we must conclude the total momentum of the ship at the end of stroke one must be equal to the total momentum of the ship before stroke one. Do you agree with this?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 01:28:24
The cat burning potential energy is losing atoms, mass is getting out of the system.
The rotating cat is not a closed system.
Jano

Although this is true on a technical level, the cat is not receiving any angular momentum from the environment so it's a moot point.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 00:47:43
What is causing the wobble of the CD players when they are ON and when they receive gentle external impulse?
Where is the action and counter-reaction coming from?

This is called gyroscopic precession. This video explains the physics behind it:

Nothing about it violates conservation of angular momentum.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:20:57
The black ball is a closed system.
The dark blue wheel is a closed system.

The very moment that those two objects interact with each other, they cease to be closed systems. A closed system is one that does not interact with other systems.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:20:57
The conclusion is that the internal subsystems can change their values, conversion from one momentum to another.
Even a conversion from linear to angular.

Not if Noether's theorem has anything to say about it.
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #183 on: 22/04/2020 06:08:22 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 05:49:36

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 05:20:57
The black ball is a closed system.
The dark blue wheel is a closed system.

The very moment that those two objects interact with each other, they cease to be closed systems. A closed system is one that does not interact with other systems.
...

The text book is clear, a close system does not change its momentum till there is an external impulse.
Where do you get your definition that "A closed system is one that does not interact with other systems"?
This is a little nuance or playing on words but very important.
It appears the only system that fits your definition is the whole Universe, if we assume there is nothing outside the Universe.
As mentioned above, the black ball is a closed system but it can change the momentum when it interacts with the wheel, the external impulse as per the textbook.
The wheel is a closed system, it is not moving, till there is an external impulse that is going to cause the rotation, as per the textbook,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #184 on: 22/04/2020 06:15:48 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:08:22
Where do you get your definition that "A closed system is one that does not interact with other systems"?

I have to admit, I had not encountered the definition of closed system that you posted before. An isolated system is more what I was thinking.

In any case, the spaceship is not only a closed system, but also an isolated system (it doesn't utilize any external mechanisms. It tries to move using only its internal mechanisms). That being said, do you agree that its momentum must remain unchanged since it is an isolated system?
Logged
 



Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #185 on: 22/04/2020 06:16:13 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 05:49:36
...
This is called gyroscopic precession. This video explains the physics behind it:

Nothing about it violates conservation of angular momentum.
...
If this was a simple gyro precession then the CD players body would not wobble.
It would keep some kind of rotation.
There are 3 gyros. That's the difference. Therefore there is a wobble, the potential well,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #186 on: 22/04/2020 06:18:47 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:15:48
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:08:22
Where do you get your definition that "A closed system is one that does not interact with other systems"?

I have to admit, I had not encountered the definition of closed system that you posted before. An isolated system is more what I was thinking.

In any case, the spaceship is not only a closed system, but also an isolated system (it doesn't utilize any external mechanisms. It tries to move using only its internal mechanisms). That being said, do you agree that its momentum must remain unchanged since it is an isolated system?
We need to know where you got your definition.
As mentioned, the only system is the whole Universe based on your definition.
... and even that one is conditional that there is nothing outside the Universe,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #187 on: 22/04/2020 06:21:34 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:16:13
If this was a simple gyro precession then the CD players body would not wobble.

Gyroscopic precession does cause a wobble. It's what causes a spinning top to wobble.

So how about answering my question?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:18:47
We need to know where you got your definition.
As mentioned, the only system is the whole Universe based on your definition,
Jano

This is one such example: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/closed-system
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #188 on: 22/04/2020 06:31:20 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:21:34
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:16:13
If this was a simple gyro precession then the CD players body would not wobble.

Gyroscopic precession does cause a wobble. It's what causes a spinning top to wobble.

So how about answering my question?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:18:47
We need to know where you got your definition.
As mentioned, the only system is the whole Universe based on your definition,
Jano

This is one such example: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/closed-system
Really???
A dictionary definition???
We need a better one.
What is your question?
Jano
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #189 on: 22/04/2020 06:33:01 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:31:20
Really???
A dictionary definition???

And what is your problem with dictionaries?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:31:20
What is your question?

This:

Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:15:48
In any case, the spaceship is not only a closed system, but also an isolated system (it doesn't utilize any external mechanisms. It tries to move using only its internal mechanisms). That being said, do you agree that its momentum must remain unchanged since it is an isolated system?

Remember, no momentum is entering or leaving the ship.
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #190 on: 22/04/2020 06:37:40 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:21:34
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:16:13
If this was a simple gyro precession then the CD players body would not wobble.

Gyroscopic precession does cause a wobble. It's what causes a spinning top to wobble.

So how about answering my question?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:18:47
We need to know where you got your definition.
As mentioned, the only system is the whole Universe based on your definition,
Jano

This is one such example: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/closed-system

How is the gyro precession causing a wobble?
Is it in the youtube videos? Where the gravity is involved?
Do you have a single wheel precession in micro-gravity?
I don't think so: 
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #191 on: 22/04/2020 06:41:14 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:37:40
How is the gyro precession causing a wobble?

It's explained by Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession#Classical_(Newtonian)

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:37:40
Is it in the youtube videos? Where the gravity is involved?
Do you have a single wheel precession in micro-gravity?

Gravity is not involved.

Now answer my question.
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #192 on: 22/04/2020 06:42:58 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:33:01
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:31:20
Really???
A dictionary definition???

And what is your problem with dictionaries?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:31:20
What is your question?

This:

Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:15:48
In any case, the spaceship is not only a closed system, but also an isolated system (it doesn't utilize any external mechanisms. It tries to move using only its internal mechanisms). That being said, do you agree that its momentum must remain unchanged since it is an isolated system?

Remember, no momentum is entering or leaving the ship.

No momentum is entering or leaving the ship?
I was saying the ship is collecting hydrogen from the space.
Still this is not relevant because the question is whether a system can generate something that resembles external momentum from within the system.
What momentum entered or left the cat when it rotated half a turn?
Jano
Logged
 



Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #193 on: 22/04/2020 06:45:06 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:41:14
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:37:40
How is the gyro precession causing a wobble?

It's explained by Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession#Classical_(Newtonian)

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:37:40
Is it in the youtube videos? Where the gravity is involved?
Do you have a single wheel precession in micro-gravity?

Gravity is not involved.

Now answer my question.
There is no wobble from a single gyro in micro-gravity, check the video.

Please, what is your question?
There were many posts, I do not know what question you are asking,
Jano


Edit: this one?
That being said, do you agree that its momentum must remain unchanged since it is an isolated system?

There is no answer till we settle the closed system definition.

Edit2:
The answer is in pointing out how the cat rotated without external momentum.
« Last Edit: 22/04/2020 06:48:23 by Jaaanosik »
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #194 on: 22/04/2020 06:49:29 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
There is no wobble from a single gyro in micro-gravity, check the video.

I can see it wobble. The wobble is just very small.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
Please, what is your question?

You already asked me this before. My question is in reply #191.
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #195 on: 22/04/2020 06:53:53 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:49:29
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
There is no wobble from a single gyro in micro-gravity, check the video.

I can see it wobble. The wobble is just very small.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
Please, what is your question?

You already asked me this before. My question is in reply #191.
Dictionary is not a textbook, and even textbooks can have mistakes,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #196 on: 22/04/2020 06:55:37 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:53:53
Dictionary is not a textbook

Your point being what?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
There is no answer till we settle the closed system definition.

The spaceship is an isolated system. That is clearly defined. No matter or energy is entering or leaving the system. No momentum is entering or leaving the system either.

So if a system does not have momentum entering or leaving it, you understand that the momentum must remain unchanged, yes?
Logged
 



Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #197 on: 22/04/2020 07:00:14 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:49:29
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
There is no wobble from a single gyro in micro-gravity, check the video.

I can see it wobble. The wobble is just very small.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
Please, what is your question?

You already asked me this before. My question is in reply #191.
Yes, there is very tiny wobble on the gyro ring, but check the axle, no wobble at all.
The wheel could have a wobble due to bearings the axle tells the story though.
It appears the axle might be slightly bent on the bottom part, the top part seems straight, without any wobble,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 656
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #198 on: 22/04/2020 07:03:41 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 22/04/2020 06:55:37
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:53:53
Dictionary is not a textbook

Your point being what?

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 06:45:06
There is no answer till we settle the closed system definition.

The spaceship is an isolated system. That is clearly defined. No matter or energy is entering or leaving the system. No momentum is entering or leaving the system either.

So if a system does not have momentum entering or leaving it, you understand that the momentum must remain unchanged, yes?
Check the cat.
Forget that the cat stopped the rotation.
What is more important is to realize that the cat was able to start the rotation without external momentum.
Do you understand what it means?
The cat is isolated system, correct?
How the cat could start the rotation without an external impulse?
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is it possible to built an inertial propulsion system for a spaceship?
« Reply #199 on: 22/04/2020 07:08:16 »
Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 07:03:41
Do you understand what it means?

Yes, it means that executing a rotation does not require net momentum (unlike your engine, which does require net momentum).

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 07:03:41
The cat is isolated system, correct?

For the sake of discussion, yes.

Quote from: Jaaanosik on 22/04/2020 07:03:41
How the cat could start the rotation without an external impulse?

Because net momentum isn't needed for a rotation (but net momentum is needed for your spaceship to go forward). I've already said that before.

The thing about the gyroscope is ultimately irrelevant. Even if I was utterly unable to explain anything about gyroscopes, I can still point to Noether's theorem as proof that you can't interconvert angular and linear momentum.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 14   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: inertia  / propulsion 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.497 seconds with 66 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.